Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Shawn W. Yount Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
shawn-w-yount
Cases Shown
3
Top Practice Route
Criminal Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Cases Involving Shawn W. Yount

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District / May 23, 2024

STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent v. SHAWN W. YOUNT, Appellant

Appellant

Shawn Yount, a prior and persistent offender, was convicted of felony stealing and four counts of second-degree burglary. On appeal, Yount challenged the sufficiency of evidence for one burglary charge, the denial of his motions to disqualify the prosecutor and a juror, and the accuracy of the written judgment regarding sentencing. The appellate court affirmed the convictions, finding sufficient evidence for burglary, no abuse of discretion in denying the disqualification motions, and no prejudicial error in the written judgment's omission of a concurrent sentence order.

Appellant

Shawn W. Yount appealed the circuit court's judgment finding him to be a dangerous offender, arguing the State failed to plead and prove all essential facts for the sentencing enhancement. Yount was convicted of four counts of second-degree burglary and sentenced to an enhanced term of 30 years imprisonment. The Missouri Supreme Court reversed, holding that the statutory definition of "dangerous offender" requires the State to satisfy both subdivisions (1) and (2) of section 558.016.4, as the word "and" is not interchangeable with "or" in this context. Since the State only satisfied one subdivision, the circuit court plainly erred in applying the enhancement, and the case was remanded for resentencing.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District / Sep 28, 2021

State of Missouri, Respondent, vs. Shawn W. Yount, Appellant.

Appellant

Shawn W. Yount appealed his conviction for four counts of second-degree burglary and his thirty-year sentence as a dangerous offender. The appellate court found no error in the admission of text message evidence, affirming that portion of the judgment. However, the court found plain error in Yount's sentencing as a dangerous offender, concluding the State failed to plead and prove all statutory requirements. Due to a conflict between the plain meaning of the dangerous offender statute and a Missouri Approved Charges-Criminal Note on Use, the court transferred the case to the Supreme Court of Missouri.