Employee: Cayree Ragsdale
Injury No: 99-081559
Before the
DIVISION OF WORKERS'
COMPENSATION
Department of Labor and Industrial Relations of Missouri
Jefferson City, Missouri
Dependents: N/A
Employer: Litton Advanced Circuitry
Additional Party N/A
Insurer: CNA Insurance Company
Checked by: LTW/mp
The above-referenced workers' compensation claim, which involved the consolidation of two workers' compensation cases, was heard before the undersigned Associate Administrative Law Judge on September 16, 2004. Therecord was left open for the submission of additional evidence, and the parties were afforded an opportunity to submit briefs, resulting in the record being completed and submitted to the undersigned on or about December 10, 2004.
The parties entered into a stipulation of facts in Injury No. 99-081559. The stipulation is as follows:
(1) On or about June 24, 1999, Litton Advanced Circuitry was an employer operating under and subject to The Missouri Workers' Compensation Law, and during this time was fully insured by CNA Insurance Co.
(2) On the alleged injury date of June 24, 1999, Cayree Ragsdale was an employee of the employer and was working under and subject to The Missouri Workers' Compensation Law.
(3) On or about June 24, 1999, the employee sustained an incident of occupational disease which arose out of and in the course and scope of employment.
(4) The above-referenced employment and incident of occupational disease occurred in Greene County, Missouri. The parties agree to venue lying in Greene County, Missouri. Venue is proper.
(5) The employee notified the employer of her injury as required by Section, 287.420, RSMo.
(6) The Claim for Compensation was filed within the time prescribed by Section 287.430, RSMo.
(7) At the time of the alleged incident of occupational disease, the employee's average weekly wage was sufficient to allow a compensation rate of $\ 294.73 for permanent partial disability compensation.
(8) Temporary disability benefits and medical care have been provided to the employee. (The parties did not identify in the stipulation the amount of temporary disability compensation and medical expenses paid by the employer and insurer in this case. However, the Receipt and Notice of Termination of Compensation identifies temporary disability compensation being paid in the amount of $\ 858.61 and medical expenses being paid in the amount of $\ 11,216.89 )
The issues to be resolved by hearing in Injury No. 99-081559 include:
(1) Whether the employee has sustained injuries that will require additional or future medical care in order to cure and relieve her of the effects of the injuries?
(2) Whether the employee sustained any permanent disability as a consequence of the alleged incident of occupational disease; and, if so, what is the nature and extent of the disability?
In Injury No. 00-177055 the parties entered into a stipulation of facts. The stipulation is as follows:
(1) On or about October 13, 2000, Litton Advance Circuitry was an employer operating under and subject to The Missouri Workers' Compensation Law, and during this time was fully insured by CNA Insurance Co.
(2) On the alleged injury date of October 13, 2000, Cayree Ragsdale was an employee of the employer and was working under and subject to The Missouri Workers' Compensation Law.
(3) The above-referenced employment and alleged incident of occupational disease accident occurred in Greene County, Missouri. The parties agree to venue lying in Greene County, Missouri. Venue is proper.
(4) The employee notified the employer of her injury as required by Section, 287.420, RSMo.
(5) The Claim for Compensation was filed within the time prescribed by Section 287.430,
| RSMo. |
| (6) | At the time of the alleged accident, the employee's average weekly wage was sufficient to allow a compensation rate of $314.26 for permanent partial disability compensation. |
| (7) | Temporary disability benefits and medical care have not been provided to the employee.In Injury No. 00-177055 the issues to be resolved by hearing include: |
| (1) | Whether the employee sustained an incident of occupational disease on or about October 13, 2000; and, if so, whether the incident of occupational disease arose out of and in the course of her employment with Litton Advanced Circuitry? |
| (2) | Whether the alleged incident of occupational disease caused the injuries and disabilities for which benefits are now being claimed? |
| (3) | Whether the employee has sustained any permanent disability as a consequence of the alleged incident of occupational disease; and, if so, what is the nature and extent of the disability? |
| (4) | Whether the Treasurer of Missouri, as the Custodian of the Second Injury Fund, is liable for payment of additional permanent partial disability compensation? |
| EVIDENCE PRESENTED |
| The employee, Cayree Ragsdale, testified at the hearing in support of her claim. Also, the employee has offered for admission the following exhibits: |
| Exhibit A | Medical Records from Norbert T. Belz, M.D. |
| Exhibit B | Medical Report from Bruce Schlafly, M.D. |
| Exhibit C | List of Activities Description |
| Exhibit D | Diagram of Joint Protection for Thumbs |
| Exhibit E | Medical Records from St. John’s Regional Health Center |
| Exhibit F | Medical Records from St. John’s Physicians & Clinics – Regional Ear, Nose & Throat Center |
| Exhibit G | Medical Records from Barry Rosenblum, M.D. |
| Exhibit H | Medical Report from Shane L. Bennoch, M.D. |
| Exhibit I | Diagram of Work Environment |
| Exhibit J | Medical Report from Suburban Surgical Associates, Inc. |
| Exhibit K | Deposition of Shane Bennoch, M.D. |
| Exhibits A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, and I were received and admitted into evidence. Exhibit J was denied admission, but it was received and retained as an offer of proof. Exhibit K was received and admitted into evidence subsequent to the hearing by agreement of the parties. |
| The employer and insurer did not present any witnesses at the hearing of this case or offer any exhibits for admission into evidence. Similarly, the Second Injury Fund did not present any witnesses at the hearing of this case or offer any exhibits for admission into evidence. |
| In addition, the parties identified several documents filed with the Division of Workers’ Compensation which were made part of a single exhibit identified as the Legal File. The undersigned took official notice of the documents contained in the Legal File which include:Letter Dated March 11, 2002 and Request to Dismiss Medical Fee Dispute (Injury No. 99-081559); Answer of Second Injury Fund to Claim for Compensation (Injury No. 00-177055); Answer of Employer & Insurer to Claim for Compensation (Injury No. 00-177055); Claim for Compensation (Injury No. 00-177055); Answer of Employer & Insurer to Claim for Compensation (Injury No. 99-081559); Claim for Compensation (Injury No. 99-081559); Receipt and Notice of Termination of Compensation (Injury No. 99-081559); and Report of Injury (Injury No. 99-081559). |
| DISCUSSION |
| The employee, Cayree Ragsdale, is nearly 54 years of age, having been born on April 17, 1951. She is a resident of Springfield, Missouri. Additionally, Ms. Ragsdale is a long-time employee of Litton Industries, having been employed by the employer for 22 years. |
| As an employee of Litton Advanced Circuitry, Ms. Ragsdale has worked in the factory, performing assembly work as |
a tool crib attendant. The duties of Ms. Ragsdale in this employment require her to perform repetitive gripping and pinching with her hands and thumbs while working with drill