Skip to content
Ott Law Firm

Mary Donohue v. Moresource, Inc.

Decision date: March 2, 20067 pages

Summary

The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirmed the administrative law judge's award regarding Mary Donohue's work-related injury to her left wrist sustained on April 15, 2002 at Moresource, Inc. The injury was found to be compensable under Missouri workers' compensation law, though no ongoing compensation or future medical care was awarded.

Archive Notice

This archive contains published Missouri Labor and Industrial Relations Commission workers' compensation decisions reproduced for research convenience. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Legal Help

Practical guidance for this decision

Third-Party Injury Check

This workers' comp decision may point to a separate injury claim.

  • A driver, contractor, property owner, or equipment company may share fault.
  • The injury involved a vehicle, unsafe premises, defective equipment, or a non-employer vendor.
  • A serious injury or death may need both benefits review and civil-claim analysis.

Caption

FINAL AWARD

(Affirming Award and Decision of Administrative Law Judge)

Injury No.: 02-046486

Employee: Mary Donohue

Employer: Moresource, Inc.

Insurer: Virginia Surety Company, Inc.

Date of Accident: April 15, 2002

Place and County of Accident: St. Charles County, Missouri

The above-entitled workers' compensation case is submitted to the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission for review as provided by section 287.480 RSMo. Having reviewed the evidence and considered the whole record, the Commission finds that the award of the administrative law judge is supported by competent and substantial evidence and was made in accordance with the Missouri Workers' Compensation Act. Pursuant to section 286.090 RSMo, the Commission affirms the award and decision of the administrative law judge dated December 23, 2005.

The award and decision of Administrative Law Judge Kevin Dinwiddie, issued December 23, 2005, is attached and incorporated by this reference.

Given at Jefferson City, State of Missouri, this $\qquad 2nd \qquad$ day of March 2006.

LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION

William F. Ringer, Chairman

Alice A. Bartlett, Member

Attest:

John J. Hickey, Member

Secretary

Employee:Mary DonohueInjury No. 02-046486
Dependents:N/ABefore the DIVISION OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION Department of Labor and Industrial Relations of Missouri Jefferson City, Missouri
Employer:Moresource, Inc.
Additional Party:N/A
Insurer:Virginia Surety Company, Inc.
Hearing Date:10/28/05; finally submitted 11/18/05Checked by: KD/bfb for yg

FINDINGS OF FACT AND RULINGS OF LAW

  1. Are any benefits awarded herein? See Award
  2. Was the injury or occupational disease compensable under Chapter 287? Yes
  3. Was there an accident or incident of occupational disease under the Law?Yes
  4. Date of accident or onset of occupational disease: $4 / 15 / 02$
  5. State location where accident occurred or occupational disease was contracted: St. Charles County, Missouri
  6. Was above employee in employ of above employer at time of alleged accident or occupational disease? Yes
  7. Did employer receive proper notice? Yes
  8. Did accident or occupational disease arise out of and in the course of the employment? Yes
  9. Was claim for compensation filed within time required by Law? Yes
  10. Was employer insured by above insurer? Yes
  11. Describe work employee was doing and how accident occurred or occupational disease contracted:

Employee was flipping fry baskets of French fries and injured her left upper extremity 12. Did accident or occupational disease cause death? No Date of death? ---- 13. Part(s) of body injured by accident or occupational disease: left upper extremity at the level of the wrist 14. Nature and extent of any permanent disability: See Award 15. Compensation paid to-date for temporary disability: None 16. Value necessary medical aid paid to date by employer/insurer? \$4,606.32 17. Value necessary medical aid not furnished by employer/insurer? N/A 18. Employee's average weekly wages: $\ 407.99 19. Weekly compensation rate: $\$ 271.99 / \ 271.99 20. Method wages computation: by agreement of the parties

COMPENSATION PAYABLE

  1. Amount of compensation payable: None See Award. The issue as to need for future medical care found in favor of the employer and insurer Unpaid medical expenses: N/A
  1. Second Injury Fund liability N/A

TOTAL: ----

  1. Future requirements awarded: None. See Award

Said payments to begin ---- and to be payable and be subject to modification and review as provided by law.

The compensation awarded to the claimant shall be subject to a lien in the amount of ---- of all payments hereunder in favor of the following attorney for necessary legal services rendered to the claimant:

FINDINGS OF FACT and RULINGS OF LAW:

Employee: Mary Donohue

Injury No: 02-046486

Before the

DIVISION OF WORKERS'

COMPENSATION

Department of Labor and Industrial Relations of Missouri

Jefferson City, Missouri

Dependents: $\quad \mathrm{N} / \mathrm{A}$

Employer: Moresource, Inc.

Additional Party N/A

Insurer: Virginia Surety Company, Inc.

Checked by: KD/bfb for yg

The claimant, Ms. Mary Donohue, and the employer and its insurer, Moresource, Inc. and Virginia Surety Company, Inc., appeared at hearing by and through their counsel and entered into certain stipulations and agreements as to the issues and evidence to be presented in this claim for compensation. The original claim having been pleaded as against the employer Campus Hospitality, Attorney Kevin H. Dunaway advised at hearing that he represents Moresource, Inc., a company that provides staffing by contract with companies such as Campus Hospitality. Attorney Dunaway acknowledged

at hearing that by agreement Moresource, Inc. provided workers' compensation insurance and is the liable employer for the injury at issue. By agreement of the parties, Attorney Gary Sanguinet for the employee amended his claim at hearing to include Moresource, Inc and Virginia Surety Company as the liable employer and insurer.

The parties agreed to hold a joint hearing in this matter with a companion claim, Injury Number 02-140656, involving the same employee, employer, and insurer as to an injury occurring on or about 12/3/02.

In the matter of Injury Number 02-046486, the employee, Ms. Donohue, and the employer and insurer agree that on or about 4/15/02 the claimant suffered an injury by accident arising out of and in the course of employment. The parties agreed at hearing that the only issues to be resolved at hearing as to the injury on 4/15/02 are future medical care, and the nature and extent of permanent partial disability.

Ms. Donohue appeared at hearing and testified on her own behalf. The employer and insurer submitted the depositions of Shawn L. Berkin, D.O., and of the claimant, Ms Donohue. The parties offered certain medical reports, and waived hearsay objection as to the various expert opinions contained within those reports.

EXHIBITS

The following exhibits are in evidence:

Claimant's Exhibits

A. Curriculum Vitae of Jack C. Tippett, M.D.

B. Medical report of Jack C. Tippett, M.D., with attached medical records

Employer and Insurer's Exhibits

  1. Receipt and Notice of Termination of Compensation in Injury Number 02-140656
  2. Medical Records of SSM Corporate Health Services from 4/15/02 through 5/7/02
  3. Medical records of SSM Corporate Health Services from 12/4/02 through 12/23/02
  4. SSM Physical Therapy records
  5. St. Joseph Health Center MRI left shoulder MRI report dated 12/20/02
  6. DePaul Health Center Chest x-ray report dated 1/14/03, 2 pages
  7. Medical records of George R. Bradbury, III, M.D.
  8. Medical records of Eddie L. Paulk, D.O.
  9. Curriculum Vitae of Mitchell B. Rotman, M.D.
  10. Independent Medical Examination of Mitchell B. Rotman dated 1/24/05
  11. Rating report of Shawn L. Berkin, D.O., dated 7/22/04
  12. Deposition of Shawn L. Berkin, D.O., dated 4/12/05
  13. Deposition of Mary Donohue taken on 10/06/05

FINDINGS OF FACT AND RULINGS OF LAW

Ms. Mary Donohue is not currently employed, and last worked as a line cook in the Lindenwood College cafeteria. Ms. Donohue worked in the grill and pasta bar area, cooking and stocking fried foods such as French fries. The claimant would spend as much as two and one half to three hours a day cooking French fries in a fry basket. On or about 4/15/02 the claimant suffered pain into her left wrist and arm while lifting and turning fry baskets.

Claimant treated with Dr. Covert that same day at SSM Corporate Health Services (See Employer and Insurer's Exhibit No. 2). Claimant was provided pain medication, a splint to wear on the affected hand, and was to begin physical therapy for what was diagnosed as an acute tenosynovitis. Claimant continued to work restricted duty, using the left hand only as a helper hand with a lifting restriction. Claimant had several follow up appointments with Dr. Covert. On 5/7/02 Dr. Covert performed an examination of the left wrist and forearm; concluded that a strain of the left forearm had resolved; and released the claimant to full duty.

Thereafter Ms. Donohue continued to work in the same area of the cafeteria, performing the same duties, and received no further treatment for left upper extremity complaints until such time as she suffered a second injury by accident on or about 12/03/02. Claimant was pulling open a box of french fries, and while tugging on the box flap, suffered severe pain from the tip of her fingers in her left hand to her shoulder, and with a burning sensation in her left arm and shoulder.

Ms. Donohue was returned to Dr. Covert for evaluation and treatment of her complaints. On 12/4/02, Dr. Covert notes, in part, the following history:

She has similar symptoms with regard to the left wrist about six to seven months ago. At that time, she was seen here and treated for acute tenosynovitis. She was referred for physical therapy and made a nice recovery. Her pain today in the wrist is similar to what she had back then.

The shoulder, however, is a new complaint. (See Employer and Insurer's Exhibit No. 3)

Dr. Covert diagnosed the claimant as suffering from an acute strain of the left shoulder, wrist, and forearm. Claimant was provided with a thumb spica splint, a prescription for Vioxx, and was instructed not to use the left arm for any lifting while undergoing physical therapy.

The physical therapist noted that the claimant complained of "excruciating pain in her left thumb, shoulder, and upper trap region". (See Employer and Insurer's Exhibit No. 4). The therapist suspected a possible rotator cuff tear and an acute tenosynovitis of the $1^{\text {st }}$ digit extensor tendons. On 12/11/02 Dr. Covert noted the physical therapist's concerns, performed a physical examination of the shoulder, and ordered an MRI scan. An MRI taken at St. Joseph Health Center on 12/20/02 was interpreted as showing a rotator cuff tear (See Employer and Insurer's Exhibit No. 5).

Dr. Covert referred the claimant to Dr. Bradbury with a diagnosis of de Quervain's tenosynovitis and left rotator cuff tear. Dr. Bradbury performed his initial examination of Ms. Donohue on 1/09/03, and on 1/21/03 performed an open left rotator cuff repair, and a de Quervain's release of the left first dorsal compartment. Ms. Donohue had follow up appointments with Dr. Bradbury, and on 1/29/03 Dr. Bradbury released the claimant for a return to work effective 2/17/03, limited to sedentary work with the right hand only. Claimant returned to work at the cafeteria, and worked a sedentary duty, checking student passes at the door.

Ms. Donohue was prescribed further physical therapy at SSM Rehab. On 3/7/03 the physical therapist reported that the claimant had attended 6 visits post her surgeries, and noted "She is experiencing pain along the superior border of the left shoulder and is only having mild tenderness in the left thumb and wrist with gripping". Claimant was further noted to experience "excruciating pain with end range PROM of the left shoulder."

Ms. Donohue met with Dr. Bradbury on 3/07/03. Dr. Bradbury notes, in part, "She is doing well. She denies any numbness or tingling. No fever or chills. She has been doing formal therapy. She says the shoulder is making progress. She still continues to complain of some weakness with overhead activity but overall she says she is doing okay". Claimant was advised at that time to continue with sedentary duty, physical therapy, and her home exercise program.

On 4/4/03 Dr. Bradbury performed an examination of the shoulder and wrist, and determined that the claimant should continue with physical therapy while returning to work with a restriction of no work above chest height.

On 5/2/03 the physical therapist noted that the claimant had been seen for a total of 18 visits post surgery, and noted, in part, as follows: "Ms. Donohue has met all PT goals. Her left shoulder and wrist ROM are normalizing and equal to the right. Her strength is improving within the left shoulder. She is independent with her HEP and can continue on

Full decision text continues in the plain-text archive copy.

Related Decisions

affirmed

The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirmed the Administrative Law Judge's award of compensation for Dale Nivens' work-related left wrist injury sustained on January 15, 2007 at Interstate Brands Corporation. The claimant was awarded $16,474.06 for 25% permanent partial disability of the left wrist, with compensation to begin immediately.

wrist4,337 words

Penning v. Harley Davidson(2018)

April 25, 2018#13-046307

affirmed

The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirmed the administrative law judge's award of workers' compensation benefits to Thomas Penning for a right wrist scaphoid fracture sustained in a May 13, 2013 work accident at Harley Davidson. The Commission found the employee's credible testimony and medical evidence, including radiological studies and treating physician diagnosis, supported that the accident was the prevailing factor causing the injury and necessitating all subsequent treatment including fusion and carpal tunnel release procedures.

wrist6,022 words

Griffin v. Hallmark Cards(2015)

December 8, 2015#95-059138

affirmed

The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirmed the Administrative Law Judge's decision denying compensation in this workers' compensation case involving a right wrist injury sustained by Carolyn Griffin on March 9, 1995. The Second Injury Fund was found not liable for disability benefits, and the employer had previously settled the claim for 70% permanent partial disability.

wrist2,212 words

Pressley v. Homewood Suites(2015)

June 24, 2015#09-094722

affirmed

The Commission affirmed the Administrative Law Judge's denial of workers' compensation benefits for a left wrist injury sustained while wringing out a wet cleaning rag, finding the employee failed to prove the injury arose out of employment under Missouri's causal connection test. The Court determined that wringing out a wet rag involves ordinary risks to which the employee would be equally exposed in normal nonemployment life and was merely a triggering factor rather than the prevailing cause of injury.

wrist5,323 words

The Commission affirmed the Administrative Law Judge's award allowing workers' compensation benefits for a claimant who fell off a ladder and injured her left wrist on August 16, 2008. The claimant was awarded permanent partial disability benefits (50% disability) and permanent total disability benefits payable for her lifetime, with the Second Injury Fund assuming liability for a portion of ongoing benefits.

wrist3,137 words