Skip to content
Ott Law Firm

Joseph Becherer v. David Sherman Corporation

Decision date: January 3, 200713 pages

Summary

The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirmed the Administrative Law Judge's award allowing workers' compensation benefits for Joseph Becherer's right groin injury sustained on September 16, 2002 while using a pipe wrench. The Commission found the injury compensable under Missouri law with permanent disability rated at 20% body as a whole for the groin injury and 4% for aggravation of pre-existing psychiatric condition.

Archive Notice

This archive contains published Missouri Labor and Industrial Relations Commission workers' compensation decisions reproduced for research convenience. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Legal Help

Practical guidance for this decision

Third-Party Injury Check

This workers' comp decision may point to a separate injury claim.

  • A driver, contractor, property owner, or equipment company may share fault.
  • The injury involved a vehicle, unsafe premises, defective equipment, or a non-employer vendor.
  • A serious injury or death may need both benefits review and civil-claim analysis.

Caption

Issued by THE LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION
FINAL AWARD ALLOWING COMPENSATION
(Affirming Award and Decision of Administrative Law Judge)
Injury No.: 02-129044
Employee:Joseph Becherer
Employer:David Sherman Corporation
Insurer:Clarendon National Insurance c/o North American Risk
Additional Party:Treasurer of Missouri as Custodian of Second Injury Fund
Date of Accident:September 16, 2002
Place and County of Accident:St. Louis, Missouri
The above-entitled workers' compensation case is submitted to the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) for review as provided by section 287.480 RSMo. Having reviewed the evidence and considered the whole record, the Commission finds that the award of the administrative law judge is supported by competent and substantial evidence and was made in accordance with the Missouri Workers' Compensation Act. Pursuant to section 286.090 RSMo, the Commission affirms the award and decision of the administrative law judge dated July 26, 2006. The award and decision of Administrative Law Judge Suzette Carlisle, issued July 26, 2006, is attached and incorporated by this reference.The Commission further approves and affirms the administrative law judge's allowance of attorney's fee herein as being fair and reasonable.
Any past due compensation shall bear interest as provided by law.
Given at Jefferson City, State of Missouri, this 3rd day of January 2007.
LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION
William F. Ringer, Chairman
Alice A. Bartlett, Member
John J. Hickey, Member
Attest:
Secretary
AWARD
Employee:Joseph Becherer
Injury No.: 02-129044
Dependents:N/ABefore the
Division of Workers'
Employer:David Sherman CorporationCompensation
Department of Labor and Industrial
Additional Party:Second Injury FundRelations of Missouri
Jefferson City, Missouri
Insurer:Clarendon National Insurance c/o North American Risk
Hearing Date:April 12, 2006Checked by: SC:tr

FINDINGS OF FACT AND RULINGS OF LAW

  1. Are any benefits awarded herein? Yes.
  2. Was the injury or occupational disease compensable under Chapter 287? Yes.
  3. Was there an accident or incident of occupational disease under the Law?Yes.
  4. Date of accident or onset of occupational disease: September 16, 2002.
  5. State location where accident occurred or occupational disease was contracted: St. Louis, Missouri.
  6. Was above employee in employ of above employer at time of alleged accident or occupational disease? Yes.
  7. Did employer receive proper notice? Yes.
  8. Did accident or occupational disease arise out of and in the course of the employment? Yes.
  9. Was claim for compensation filed within time required by Law? Yes.
  10. Was employer insured by above insurer? Yes.
  11. Describe work employee was doing and how accident occurred or occupational disease contracted:

While using a pipe wrench, Employee applied pressure to release plumbing and felt a burning sensation in his right groin. 12. Did accident or occupational disease cause death? No Date of death? N/A 13. Part(s) of body injured by accident or occupational disease: Right groin and aggravation of pre-existing psychiatric condition. 14. Nature and extent of any permanent disability: 20 % body as a whole for the right groin injury, 4 % body as a whole for psychiatric injury. 15. Compensation paid to-date for temporary disability: $\ 29,055.24. 16. Value necessary medical aid paid to date by employer/insurer? $\ 27,948.70.

Employee: Joseph Becherer Injury No.: 02-129044 17. Value necessary medical aid not furnished by employer/insurer? $\ 415.00 18. Employee's average weekly wages: $\ 876.22 19. Weekly compensation rate: $\$ 584.15 / \ 340.12 20. Method wages computation: Stipulation

COMPENSATION PAYABLE

  1. Amount of compensation payable:

Unpaid medical bills owed by Employer: $\ 415.00

96 weeks of permanent partial disability from Employer$32,651.52
22. Second Injury Fund liability: Yes
22 weeks of permanent partial disability from Second Injury Fund$7,482.64
TOTAL:$40,549.16
Said payments to begin and to be payable and be subject to modification and review as provided by law.
The compensation awarded to the claimant shall be subject to a lien in the amount of 25% of all payments hereunder in favor of the following attorney for necessary legal services rendered to the claimant: William K. Meehan.

FINDINGS OF FACT and RULINGS OF LAW:

Employee:Joseph BechererInjury No.: 02-129044
Dependents:N/ABefore the <br> Division of Workers' <br> Compensation <br> Department of Labor and Industrial
Employer:David Sherman CorporationRelations of Missouri <br> Jefferson City, Missouri
Additional Party:Second Injury Fund
Checked by: SC:tr
Insurer:Clarendon National Insurance C/o North American Risk

PRELIMINARY MATTERS

A hearing was held on April 12, 2006 in the Missouri Division of Workers’ Compensation St. Louis Office at the request of Joseph Becherer (Claimant) pursuant to Section 287.450. Attorney William K. Meehan represented Claimant. Attorney Loretta Simon represented David Sherman Corporation (Employer), and Clarendon National Insurance Company c/o North American Risk (Insurer). Assistant Attorney General Kareitha Osborne represented the Second Injury Fund (SIF). The record remained open for the deposition testimony of Dr. Sandra Tate, which was received on April 28, 2006, and the record closed on that date. Venue is proper and jurisdiction properly lies with the Missouri Division of Workers’ Compensation.

STIPULATIONS

  1. On or about September 16, 2002, Claimant, while in the employment of Employer, sustained an accident arising out of and in the course of employment occurring in the City of St. Louis.
  2. The Employer and Claimant were operating under the provisions of the Missouri Workers’ Compensation law.
  3. The Employer’s liability was fully insured by Clarendon National Insurance Company.
  1. The Employer had notice of the injury.
  2. A Claim for Compensation was filed within the time prescribed by law.

ISSUES

  1. Is Claimant permanently and totally disabled (PTD) or permanently and partially disabled (PPD) following the work injury and if so, to what extent?
  2. Is Employer responsible to pay $\ 1,538.00 in past medical expenses?
  3. Is Employer responsible to pay for future medical care for Claimant?
  4. Is the SIF responsible to pay Claimant either PTD or PPD benefits, and if so to what degree?

SUMMARY OF EVIDENCE

Only evidence supporting this award will be summarized. Any objections not expressly ruled on in this award are overruled. Claimant offered Exhibits A-O, which were admitted into evidence without objection. Employer offered Exhibits 1-10. Claimant objected to the admission of Exhibits 7 and 8 under Section 287.215 RSMo 2000. A ruling was reserved on Exhibits 7-8 until the evidence has been reviewed and the issue has been briefed by the parties. The SIF offered no exhibits.

LIVE TESTIMONY

James Becherer: Claimant is 46 years old, married with two children ages 6 and 21 and three stepchildren. Claimant quit school after ninth grade and later obtained a GED at age 18.

His wife works the early shift for Employer.

Claimant's early jobs include managing a trailer park, operating a forklift, performing manual jobs, and carpentry. He has no office experience, minimal computer or clerical skills, and he is able to use the Internet after taking a one-day class.

Claimant worked for Employer, an alcohol bottling company, from 1982 until February 2004. After performing plumbing, carpentry, electrical, machine change over and repair work for Employer, Claimant progressed to a maintenance position a few years ago where he climbed ladders, installed 10,000 feet of pipe, crawled, carried items and built offices.

On September 16, 2002, Claimant was forcefully using a pipe wrench to remove plumbing when he injured his right groin. He immediately felt pain. He noticed a lump that evening, reported it the next day to his supervisor, and was sent to the doctor. A short time later, he was referred to Dr. Pruitt who diagnosed a hernia and repaired it with mesh in his right groin area, resulting in a 4 -inch long scar. Immediately after surgery, he experienced a burning sensation to the touch. His thigh and abdomen were normal, but the line to his mid thigh was numb. Dr. Pruitt referred him to Dr. Tate who provided a nerve block, which lasted 24 hours. He was referred to Dr. Mackinnon who referred him to Dr. Swarm for pain management. Dr. Swarm prescribed Neurontin, which caused grogginess and difficulty making decisions.

Claimant's right leg became swollen and painful when walking. Dr. Mackinnon performed surgery and opined a nerve may have been damaged but not severed in the location of the hernia. After surgery, Claimant returned to work light duty working from two to six hours a day with extreme pain, difficulty sitting or standing on concrete, and shooting pain without activity. In December 2003, Dr. Swarm increased Claimant to working eight hours a day, which was difficult for him, so the hours were reduced to four a day and he filed for FMLA.

Claimant experienced some relief with rest. Claimant quit working because Employer would not accommodate a sixhour schedule. He was prescribed Oxycontin three times a day, which caused him to be delirious, incoherent, and experience feelings of uselessness. He has taken up to twelve pills a day for pain.

Dr. Mackinnon referred Claimant to Dr. Swarm who prescribed physical therapy and rehabilitation, medication and a TENS unit. Claimant felt he was crippled and unable to work. Dr. Swarm referred Claimant to a psychotherapist, Dr. Zhang, who prescribed Ambien for sleep in February 2004.

In 2006, Dr. Swarm installed a stimulator into Claimant's groin, which provided some relief, but there were side effects such as shocks, jolts with coughing, and discomfort with sitting. The stimulator was later removed.

Claimant currently complained of right groin pain all day, increased with movement, pain in the testicle and abdomen, inflammation in his back and buttocks with excessive lifting. Claimant's pain level is 10 out of 10 . Sitting is uncomfortable. Pressing on the brake pedal causes a shooting pain into his groin; he has difficulty sleeping, and frequent urination during the night. To obtain comfort, Claimant wears loose clothing, sleeps nude and avoids elastic bands.

Intercourse is painful and Claimant is unable to achieve orgasm. He increases medication intake at the end of the day. He thinks about the pain every time he moves and is anxious and fearful. On cross-examination, Claimant testified he has not applied for full or part time work and Dr. Liebhaber was incorrect if he said Claimant had.

Claimant testified he is able to do laundry (three loads twice a week), grocery shop, cook (four to five nights per week), clean, and cut the grass with a self-propelled lawn mower. He trims and fertilizes the lawn with a spreader, feeds and walks the dogs, cares for his young son, wakes him and drives him to and from school, karate class, plays ball with him, spends up to 20 hours per week on the internet, and transfers money on-line.

He started receiving social security in 2004. Pain and side effects from medication prevent him from working forty hours a week. Claimant stops taking medication occasionally because of the side effects. He lies around the house to keep the pain down. The pain is excruciating and causes depression. His right thigh and abdomen have gotten worse. He takes Oxycontin, which is expected to cost $\ 400 to $\ 500 a month.

On cross-examination, Claimant admitted he missed two of eight pain management sessions, was

Full decision text continues in the plain-text archive copy.

Related Decisions

reversed

The Commission reversed the administrative law judge's award of permanent partial disability and Second Injury Fund liability, finding that the employee's claim against the Second Injury Fund was barred by the statute of limitations under § 287.430 RSMo. Following the Couch decision, the court determined that a settlement agreement cannot be considered a timely 'claim' where a prior claim for the same injury had already been filed.

groin5,876 words