Skip to content
Ott Law Firm

Judy Hartle v. Ozark Cable Contracting

Decision date: May 29, 200821 pages

Summary

The Commission affirmed the Administrative Law Judge's award allowing workers' compensation benefits for an employee who fell off a ladder and sustained a right knee injury on September 17, 2002. The award totaled $51,025.88, including medical benefits, temporary total disability, and permanent partial disability compensation of 45%.

Archive Notice

This archive contains published Missouri Labor and Industrial Relations Commission workers' compensation decisions reproduced for research convenience. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Legal Help

Practical guidance for this decision

Third-Party Injury Check

This workers' comp decision may point to a separate injury claim.

  • A driver, contractor, property owner, or equipment company may share fault.
  • The injury involved a vehicle, unsafe premises, defective equipment, or a non-employer vendor.
  • A serious injury or death may need both benefits review and civil-claim analysis.

Caption

FINAL AWARD ALLOWING COMPENSATION (Affirming Award and Decision of Administrative Law Judge)Injury No.: 02-105248
Employee:Judy Hartle
Employer:Ozark Cable Contracting
Insurer:Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance Company
Date of Accident:September 17, 2002
Place and County of Accident:Tiptonville, Tennessee
The above-entitled workers' compensation case is submitted to the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) for review as provided by section 287.480 RSMo. Having reviewed the evidence and considered the whole record, the Commission finds that the award of the administrative law judge is supported by competent and substantial evidence and was made in accordance with the Missouri Workers' Compensation Act. Pursuant to section 286.090 RSMo, the Commission affirms the award and decision of the administrative law judge dated February 8, 2008. The award and decision of Administrative Law Judge Lawrence C. Kasten, issued February 8, 2008, is attached and incorporated by this reference.
The Commission further approves and affirms the administrative law judge's allowance of attorney's fee herein as being fair and reasonable.
Any past due compensation shall bear interest as provided by law.
Given at Jefferson City, State of Missouri, this 29th day of May 2008.
LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION
William F. Ringer, Chairman
Alice A. Bartlett, Member
John J. Hickey, Member
Attest:
S S U E D B Y DIVISION OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION
AWARD
Employee: Judy HartleInjury No. 02-105248
Employer: Ozark Cable Contracting
Additional Party: None.
Insurer: Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance Company
Hearing Date: November 7, 2007Checked by: LK/kh
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
• Are any benefits awarded herein? Yes.
• Was the injury or occupational disease compensable under Chapter 287? Yes.
• Was there an accident or incident of occupational disease under the Law? Yes.
• Date of accident or onset of occupational disease? September 17, 2002.
• State location where accident occurred or occupational disease contracted: Tiptonville, Tennessee.
• Was above employee in employ of above employer at time of alleged accident or occupational disease? Yes.
• Did employer receive proper notice? Yes.
• Did accident or occupational disease arise out of and in the course of the employment? Yes.

- Was claim for compensation filed within time required by Law? Yes.

- Was employer insured by above insurer? Yes.

- Describe work employee was doing and how accident happened or occupational disease contracted: The employee fell off a ladder and injured her right knee.

- Did accident or occupational disease cause death? No.

- Parts of body injured by accident or occupational disease: Right knee.

- Nature and extent of any permanent disability: 45\% permanent partial disability of the right knee.

- Compensation paid to date for temporary total disability: None.

- Value necessary medical aid paid to date by employer-insurer? None.

- Value necessary medical aid not furnished by employer-insurer? \7,566.68.

- Employee's average weekly wage: \ 577.37

- Weekly compensation rate: $\$ 384.91 / \ 340.12

- Method wages computation: By agreement.

- Amount of compensation payable:

$\ 7,566.68 in previously incurred medical benefits.

$\ 18,970.56 in temporary total disability benefits.

$\ 24,488.64 in permanent partial disability benefits.

TOTAL: $\ 51,025.88

- Second Injury Fund liability: N/A

- Future requirements awarded: None.

Said payments to begin (see rulings of law) and be payable and be subject to modification and review as provided by law.

The compensation awarded to the claimant shall be subject to a lien in the amount of 25 % of all payments hereunder in favor of the following attorney for necessary legal services rendered to the claimant: Robert Ramshur.

FINDINGS OF FACT AND RULINGS OF LAW

On November 7, 2007, Judy Hartle, appeared in person and by her attorney, Robert Ramshur for a hearing for a final award. The employer-insurer was represented at the hearing by its attorney, James Telthorst. Also present was the employer, Chris Harris. The parties agreed on certain undisputed facts and identified the issues that were in dispute. These undisputed facts and issues, together with the findings of fact and rulings of law, are set forth below as follows:

UNDISPUTED FACTS:

- On September 17, 2002, Ozark Cable Contracting was operating under and subject to the provisions of the Missouri Workers' Compensation Act and its liability was fully insured by Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance Company.

- On September 17, 2002, Judy Hartle sustained an accident arising out of and in the course of her employment.

- The employer had notice of the alleged employee's accident.

- Judy Hartle's claim was filed within the time allowed by law.

- Judy Hartle's average weekly wage was $\ 577.37. The rate of compensation for temporary total and permanent total is $\ 384.91 per week. The rate of compensation for permanent partial disability is $\ 340.12 per week.

- The employer-insurer has not paid any medical aid.

- The employer-insurer has not paid any temporary disability.

- Judy Hartle stipulated to the lien of $\ 975.00 for former Attorney Daniel J. Brown.

ISSUES:

- Covered employee

- Medical causation

- Claim for previously incurred medical

- Claim for additional or future medical aid.

- Nature and extent of disability

EXHIBITS:

The following exhibits were offered and admitted into evidence:

Employee's Exhibits

- Summary of medical bills

- Deposition of Dr. David Volarich with exhibits

- Deposition of Gary Weimholt with exhibits

- Medical report of Dr. Rende

- Deposition of Christopher Harris

Employer-insurer's Exhibits

- Deposition of Dr. Nogalski with exhibits

- Deposition of Karen Thaler-Kane with exhibits

- Medical records of Dr. Farley

Witnesses: Judy Hartle; Cassie Ingram, for the employee; and Chris Harris, the employer

Briefs: The claimant filed her hearing brief/case summary on the date of the hearing. On November 27, 2007, the employer-insurer filed two alternate proposed awards. On November 30, 2007, the employee filed a proposed final award.

FINDINGS OF FACT FOR ISSUE 1 COVERED EMPLOYEE:

Chris Harris is the brother of Judy Hartle. He the sole proprietor and owner of Ozark Cable Contracting and has been in business for approximately 10 years. Since he started operating the company he has contracted with different cable television providers to perform a variety of services including the installation of cable television both underground cable and wiring of homes; tower work; conducting audits to find illegal customers; and sales. Mr. Harris has a written contract or agreement with the cable television companies that request his services. The contract includes what services that Ozark Cable Contracting is to perform and in what location. Cable contracting is the only business that Mr. Harris is in. In 2002, Mr. Harris had workers' compensation insurance on himself. In the past, Mr. Harris has hired another company to do work and they were required to provide their own workers' compensation insurance.

In September of 2002, Ozark Cable’s service area was Missouri, Illinois, Arkansas and Tennessee. Mr. Harris testified that his company does not have any employees and that everyone that works for Ozark Cable including Judy Hartle was a subcontractor. In September of 2002, he had fifteen or twenty people who were performing the same type of work that Judy Hartle performed. There were no written agreements between Ozark Cable and Ms. Hartle or

any other person who performed work for Ozark. The employer's base of operation was in Piedmont, Missouri. Ms. Hartle lived in St. Louis and went to Piedmont to pick up her work orders.

Ozark Cable contracted with cable companies to perform work that could last for a day or six months. Mr. Harris had a list of people that he would call to see if they would work for him at the price he was paying. Judy Hartle was on the list. Ms. Hartle was free to decline the work, was not obligated to be on call, and could work for someone else. Ms. Hartle stated that her brother might not call her again if she turned him down. She did not work continuously for Ozark. Her brother would call her when she was needed. Each cable company provided a list of what services were to be performed at each location and address. Mr. Harris would then give the people that worked for him a list of the exact services at each location they were to complete.

The work that Judy Hartle performed for Ozark was anything from installations including wiring of cable television, to disconnecting customers, and quality control. With regard to quality control, she would receive a copy of what the installers were supposed to have done at each address. She would verify what had been done at each address. On September 17, 2002, she was working for Ozark Cable Contracting performing audits, disconnects and sales. Audits were to verify whether or not for each address they were getting illegal cable services. If that address was not a subscriber, she talked to them about either signing up or being disconnected. If they wanted to sign up, she would perform an installation. Otherwise, she performed a disconnection. Her work was all above ground. The tools that she used to perform her job included drills, screwdrivers, and a ladder.

For quality control services she would get paid a set amount for either a $1 / 2$ day or full day of work. Ms. Hartle was paid a certain sum for each service she performed which included inspecting houses, disconnecting services, signing up services, and installing services. There were no other benefits such as health insurance or 401 K . She was paid weekly with no payroll taxes withheld and no W-2 issued. She was responsible for her deductions and taxes.

Ms. Hartle supplied her own vehicle to go to and from the job sites. She paid for her own gasoline and was not paid for any expenses such as meals or travel. She provided her own tools including a ladder. All of the people that worked for Ozark were required to have a sign on the side of their truck which said Ozark Cable Contracting or Cable TV. Ozark Cable supplied the magnetic signs. Mr. Harris stated that most of the time the person would have a small 12x12 magnetic sign that said Cable TV which worked for whatever cable system they were doing work for. In 2002, some of the trucks had an Ozark Cable magnetic sign on them. The truck Ms. Hartle was using had an Ozark Cable Contracting sign on it that was supplied by Mr. Harris.

Mr. Harris decided what area each person was assigned to work and what specific work was to be performed. He gave Ms. Hartle a computer print out of every address with every type of service that was to be done in the specific area. The employer directed her where to go and what she was to do. She could set her own hours and decide which order of houses or streets she performed the services. Mr. Harris could let Ms. Hartle go at anytime. He was not obligated to keep her for any given period of time or at any particular location. After giving her a list of services to perform, he could have changed his mind and tell her he did not want her to do any more work and to turn her paperwork and sign in. He could let anyone go at any time, even if he had assigned them to an area. Mr. Harris had control over whether they would work or not.

In 2002, Ms. Hartle performed work for Ozark Cable for eleven weeks prior to September 17, 2002. She had worked for him at other times before 2002. On September 17, 2002, Ms. Hartle was working in Tiptonville, Tennessee. She was standing on a seven or eight foot ladder next to the roof of an apartment building working on the splitter of an overhead line. She w

Full decision text continues in the plain-text archive copy.

Related Decisions

affirmed

The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirmed the administrative law judge's award allowing workers' compensation benefits for an employee's left knee injury, including approval for total knee replacement and related medical care. One dissenting member argued the knee replacement did not flow from the work injury and that employer liability should be limited to the successful meniscectomies already performed.

knee5,412 words

The Commission reversed the ALJ's award granting workers' compensation benefits to a certified nursing assistant who injured her left knee while backing out of a narrow space between a bed and wall at a nursing home on March 5, 2015. The ALJ had found the injury work-related and awarded medical expenses, temporary total disability, mileage reimbursement, and permanent partial disability benefits, but the Commission determined this award was erroneous.

knee12,845 words
affirmed

The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirmed the Administrative Law Judge's award denying workers' compensation benefits to Jamie E. Overstreet for a knee injury sustained on February 12, 2018. A dissenting opinion argued the injury arose out of employment and that the employee was entitled to temporary total disability, permanent partial disability, and future medical benefits.

knee6,228 words

Davis v. Negri Plumbing(2020)

January 14, 2020#10-069808

reversed

The Commission reversed the administrative law judge's decision and found the Second Injury Fund (SIF) liable for compensation in this case involving a preexisting condition of osteogenesis imperfecta. The employee sustained a compensable right knee injury on September 1, 2010, and the Commission determined that the preexisting condition constituted a hindrance or obstacle to employment for purposes of SIF liability.

knee10,924 words
affirmed

The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirmed the administrative law judge's award of workers' compensation for Jackie W. Hooper's work-related knee injuries (medial meniscus tears) sustained at the Missouri Department of Corrections. One dissenting opinion argued that future medical treatment should be limited to care directly addressing the compensable injury rather than all conditions affecting the injured body part.

knee5,550 words