I have reviewed and considered all of the competent and substantial evidence on the whole record. Based on my review of the evidence as well as my consideration of the relevant provisions of the Missouri Workers' Compensation Law, I believe the decision of the administrative law judge should be reversed.
The administrative law judge erred in finding that employee failed to satisfy his burden to show that his left knee injuries were medically causally related to his work accidents in 2001. Claimant's medical expert, Dr. Musich, opined that the two work accidents in 2001 were a substantial factor in the cause of employee's left knee problems. Even employer/insurer's medical expert, Dr. Nogalski, believed employee's left knee problems were the result of the work accidents as demonstrated by his 1 % permanent partial disability rating for those injuries. Dr. Nogalski stated that "it looks like 1 percent of the permanent partial disability would be attributable to his two claimed injuries in 2001 . . ." Thus, the undisputed evidence shows that employee's left knee injuries were medically causally related to his April 20, 2001, and December 6, 2001, work accidents.
The administrative law judge also erred in finding that there was no evidence apportioning separate percentages of disability between the two left knee injuries. Dr. Musich's expert medical opinion that employee's left knee surgery was related to his work injury is more credible than the contrary opinion of Dr. Nogalski. Dr. Musich opined that as a result of the two work accidents in 2001, employee suffered 30\% permanent partial disability of the left knee. I agree that Dr. Musich did not apportion the 30\% disability finding between the two separate injuries. However, Dr. Nogalski did provide credible evidence that employee suffered permanent partial disability of 7 % solely as a result of the left knee surgery. Therefore, employee should have been awarded 7\% permanent partial disability for his December 6, 2001, work injury and 23 % permanent partial disability for his April 20, 2001, work injury.
Furthermore, since employee's need for left knee surgery was caused by the December 6, 2001, work accident, I would award employee past medical expenses in the amount of $\ 16,673.13. Finally, I would award employee 5 and $3 / 7 weeks of temporary total disability benefits at the stipulated rate of \ 628.90. This is for the time period between his surgery (February 19, 2004), through the date he was released to return to work (March 29, 2004).
For the foregoing reasons, I respectfully dissent from the decision of the majority of the Commission to deny employee benefits.
John J. Hickey, Member