| FINAL AWARD DENYING COMPENSATION (Affirming Award and Decision of Administrative Law Judge by Separate Opinion) |
| Injury No.: 07-070265 |
| Employee: | Bonita Miller |
| Employer: | U. S. Airways Group, Incorporated |
| Insurer: | New Hampshire Insurance Company c/o AIG Domestic Claims, Incorporated |
The above-entitled workers' compensation case is submitted to the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) for review as provided by $\S 287.480$ RSMo. We have reviewed the evidence, heard the parties' arguments, and considered the whole record. Pursuant to $\S 286.090$ RSMo, we affirm the denial of compensation by separate opinion. The award and decision of Administrative Law Judge Rebecca S. Magruder issued July 24, 2008, is attached and incorporated by this reference to the extent it is not inconsistent with our findings, conclusions, award, and decision herein.
The administrative law judge recited that the only disputed issue in this case is whether employee's claim for compensation is barred by the statute of limitations. The transcript reveals there are other issues in dispute. One of those other issues is dispositive of the claim.
The instant claim for compensation designated Injury No. 07- 070265 alleges employee sustained workrelated bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome caused by repetitive trauma through January 29, 2007. Employee also has a pending claim for compensation designated Injury No. 04-054594 alleging work-related bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome caused by repetitive trauma through June 4, 2004. Employer/insurer admits that employee has sustained an occupational disease arising out of and in the course of employment with employer, but disputes that employee sustained the occupational disease on or about January 29, 2007.
The obvious question becomes did employee sustain two occupational diseases through her employment with employer? We agree with the administrative law judge that the medical condition of ill (bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome) underlying the instant claim is the same condition of ill for which employee was diagnosed and treated in 2004. Having determined that employee has not established she sustained a new and distinct injury caused by repetitive trauma through January 29, 2007, as alleged in the instant claim, we deny the claim.
We do not adopt or incorporate the administrative law judge's discussion and conclusions regarding whether this claim for compensation was filed within the periods set forth in the 2004 and 2007 versions of $\S 287.430$ RSMo and what version of the statute properly applies because determination of those issues is not necessary to our award and decision. Those issues are more properly addressed in resolution on Injury No. 04-054594.
Given at Jefferson City, State of Missouri, this 25th day of March 2009.
William F. Ringer, Chairman
Alice A. Bartlett, Member
John J. Hickey, Member
Attest:
Secretary