Skip to content
Ott Law Firm

Peggy King v. Dierberg's Markets, Inc.

Decision date: May 5, 201011 pages

Summary

The Missouri Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirmed the administrative law judge's award allowing workers' compensation benefits for Peggy King's right wrist, hand, and forearm conditions caused by over ten years of work with Dierberg's Markets, Inc. The Commission agreed that the employee's work was the prevailing factor in causing her occupational condition and upheld awards for temporary total disability, past medical expenses, permanent partial disability, and disfigurement benefits.

Archive Notice

This archive contains published Missouri Labor and Industrial Relations Commission workers' compensation decisions reproduced for research convenience. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Legal Help

Practical guidance for this decision

Third-Party Injury Check

This workers' comp decision may point to a separate injury claim.

  • A driver, contractor, property owner, or equipment company may share fault.
  • The injury involved a vehicle, unsafe premises, defective equipment, or a non-employer vendor.
  • A serious injury or death may need both benefits review and civil-claim analysis.

Caption

FINAL AWARD ALLOWING COMPENSATION (Affirming Award and Decision of Administrative Law Judge by Separate Opinion)
Injury No.: 05-132631
Employee:Peggy King
Employer:Dierberg’s Markets, Inc.
Insurer:Self Insured c/o CCMO
Additional Party:Treasurer of Missouri as Custodian of Second Injury Fund (Open)
The above-entitled workers’ compensation case is submitted to the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) for review as provided by § 287.480 RSMo. We have reviewed the evidence, read the briefs, and considered the entire record. Pursuant to § 286.090 RSMo, the Commission affirms the award and decision of the administrative law judge dated November 13, 2009, by issuing a separate opinion allowing compensation in the above-captioned case.The findings of fact were accurately recounted in the award of the administrative law judge and are adopted by the Commission.The administrative law judge concluded that employee’s work with employer for over ten years was the prevailing factor in the cause of her right wrist, hand, and forearm conditions. Thus, the administrative law judge awarded employee temporary total disability benefits, past medical expenses, permanent partial disability benefits, and disfigurement. We agree with the administrative law judge’s conclusions, however, we disagree with the administrative law judge’s disparaging comments directed at the employer’s expert witness, Victor J. Zuccarello.
Mr. Zuccarello is an Ergonomics Specialist and testified on behalf of employer. The administrative law judge indicated in the award that Mr. Zuccarello’s “opinion is worthless.” The administrative law judge went on to state that Mr. Zuccarello’s opinions “have no weight or authority and are a waste of time and money.” The administrative law judge finally suggests that the mere “[u]se of [Mr. Zuccarello’s] ‘opinion’ comes very close to, if in fact it does not actually constitute, fraud under § 287.128(6) and (7).”These comments directed at Mr. Zuccarello are completely unnecessary and have no place in an administrative law judge’s award. The administrative law judge’s ultimate conclusion is that he finds Dr. Volarich’s opinion more credible than the opinions of Dr. Ollinger and Mr. Zuccarello. We find, based on the entirety of the evidence, that this is an accurate conclusion and, therefore, affirm the award and decision of the administrative law judge. However, as stated above, we do not adopt the comments directed at Mr. Zuccarello and, therefore, deem it necessary to issue this separate opinion.

The Commission affirms and incorporates by reference the administrative law judge's award of benefits as stated in the Award issued November 13, 2009.

The award and decision of Administrative Law Judge Matthew D. Vacca, issued November 13, 2009, is affirmed, and is attached and incorporated by this reference.

The Commission further approves and affirms the administrative law judge's allowance of attorney's fee as being fair and reasonable.

Any past due compensation shall bear interest as provided by law.

Given at Jefferson City, State of Missouri, this $5^{\text {th }}$ day of May 2010.

LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION

William F. Ringer, Chairman

Alice A. Bartlett, Member

CONCURRING OPINION FILED

John J. Hickey, Member

Attest:

Secretary

I have reviewed and considered all of the competent and substantial evidence on the whole record. Based on my review of the evidence as well as my consideration of the relevant provisions of the Missouri Workers' Compensation Law, I believe the decision of the administrative law judge should be affirmed without modification. Therefore, I adopt the decision of the administrative law judge, in its entirety, as my decision in this matter.

John J. Hickey, Member

AWARD

Employee:Peggy KingInjury No.: 05-132631
Dependents:N/ABefore the <br> Division of Workers' <br> Compensation
Employer:Dierberg's Markets Inc.Department of Labor and Industrial
Additional Party:Second Injury Fund (open)Relations of Missouri
Jefferson City, Missouri
Insurer:Self Insured c/o CCMO
Hearing Date:July 15, 2009Checked by: MDV:cw

FINDINGS OF FACT AND RULINGS OF LAW

  1. Are any benefits awarded herein? Yes
  2. Was the injury or occupational disease compensable under Chapter 287? Yes
  3. Was there an accident or incident of occupational disease under the Law? Yes
  4. Date of accident or onset of occupational disease: December 27, 2005
  5. State location where accident occurred or occupational disease was contracted: St. Louis, County, Missouri
  6. Was above employee in employ of above employer at time of alleged accident or occupational disease? Yes
  7. Did employer receive proper notice? Yes
  8. Did accident or occupational disease arise out of and in the course of the employment? Yes
  9. Was claim for compensation filed within time required by Law? Yes
  10. Was employer insured by above insurer? Yes
  11. Describe work employee was doing and how accident occurred or occupational disease contracted: Developed right carpal tunnel syndrome working as a checker.
  12. Did accident or occupational disease cause death? No Date of death?
  13. Part(s) of body injured by accident or occupational disease: Right upper extremity
  14. Nature and extent of any permanent disability: 171 / 2 % of right wrist
  15. Compensation paid to-date for temporary disability: $\ 0
  16. Value necessary medical aid paid to date by employer/insurer? $\ 0
Employee: Peggy KingInjury No.: 05-132631
17. Employee's average weekly wages: $523.85
18. Weekly compensation rate: $349.25/$349.25
19. Method wages computation: Agreed
**COMPENSATION PAYABLE**
20. Amount of compensation payable:
Unpaid medical expenses:$7,166.62
10 weeks of temporary total disability (or temporary partial disability)$3,492.50
30.625 weeks of permanent partial disability from Employer$10,695.78
Including 2 weeks for scarring$698.50
21. Second Injury Fund liability: Open
**TOTAL:**$22,053.40
22. Future requirements awarded: None

Said payments to begin and to be payable and be subject to modification and review as provided by law.

The compensation awarded to the Claimant shall be subject to a lien in the amount of 25% of all payments hereunder in favor of the following attorney for necessary legal services rendered to the Claimant: Ann Dalton

FINDINGS OF FACT and RULINGS OF LAW:

Employee: Peggy King

Dependents: N/A

Employer: Dierberg's Markets Inc.

Additional Party: Second Injury fund (open)

Insurer: Self Insured c/o CCMO

Injury No: 05-132631

Before the

Division of Workers'

Compensation

Department of Labor and Industrial

Relations of Missouri

Jefferson City, Missouri

Checked by: MDV:cw

ISSUES PRESENTED

The issues presented for resolution are:

  1. Occupational disease arising out of and in the course and scope of employment;
  2. Liability for medical expense;
  3. Liability for temporary total disability benefits from February 4, 2006 to February 25, 2006 and May 27, 2006 to June 24, 2006; and
  4. The nature and extent of any permanent partial disability and disfigurement.

It was agreed that if the claim were determined to be compensable, the employer/insurer would pay $\ 7,166.62 in medical expense and $\ 2571.36 in temporary total disability benefits.

FINDINGS OF FACT

  1. Claimant was born on July 21, 1948. She is 5'7" tall and weighs 165 pounds. She is right- hand dominant. Claimant worked for Dierberg's Markets, Inc. for ten years, 40 hours a week, beginning in September 1998. Her schedule varied from week to week, but she always worked Sunday and at least five days a week, with occasional overtime. She is not currently employed.
  2. Claimant has smoked on and off for the past 40 years, smoking up to a pack and a half a day. She last smoked in January 2009.
  3. Until the end of 2005, Claimant worked as a cashier, checking groceries about 42 % of the time, at the courtesy counter about 49 % of the time and monitored the U-scan about 9 % of the time. Beginning in late 2005, the Claimant worked solely as a checker.
  4. As a checker, the Claimant lifted items from the bottom of grocery carts and placed them on the belt using both hands. She picked up groceries from the conveyor belt with her right hand, transferring them over the scanner to her left hand. This required constant grabbing, flexion and twisting with her hands. Items such as fruits and

vegetables required entry of a code using a ten key touch screen. The screen was heat or touch sensitive. Claimant used her right index finger to "punch" or tap the screen, which was sometimes difficult to use and often required multiple attempts. The screen sometimes had to be cleaned off so it would register heat or touch. In addition, while checking, Claimant sometimes also bagged the same groceries. As a checker, Claimant had to lift items off the bottom of the cart and place them onto the conveyor belt. She explained that she knew the codes for some heavier items and therefore did not have to lift all items from the bottom of the cart; however, it was mandatory to lift alcohol and charcoal. For regular items she would pick them up and slide them from her right hand to her left hand over the scanner. Ninety percent of the time she had a bagger bagging the groceries.

  1. Almost every job duty as a checker required constant and repetitive use of the Claimant's hands.
  2. At the courtesy counter, Claimant filled cashiers' tills, which required gripping and counting money with her hands. With her hands, she also counted coupons, took payments for utility bills, sold lottery tickets, and processed returned milk bottles. Almost every job duty at the courtesy counter required constant and repetitive use of the Claimant's hands.
  3. At the U-scan, Claimant helped customers if there was a problem scanning. She had to pull the bags out and "fluff" them. During any down time, the Claimant cleaned the stations using a spray bottle, which she squeezed with her right hand.
  4. As a trainer, the Claimant testified her job duties included showing the employee how to work the touch screen computer system and tapping all keys with the right index or middle finger. When in charge of the U-scan, the Claimant's job duties included helping customers with the touch screen, cleaning the scanner with a spray bottle, fluffing the bags, punching numbers in for codes, all while watching a total of eight U-scanners.
  5. In December of 2005, the Claimant started having problems dropping things. She noticed numbness and tingling in her right hand, which radiated into her forearm. These symptoms increased after the Claimant started working solely as a checker. She went to her primary care physician, Dr. Nagel, for a cold and mentioned her hand. Her doctor diagnosed right carpal tunnel syndrome and gave her a brace.
  6. After reporting her condition to the employer, the Claimant was directed to Dr. Henry Ollinger regarding the numbness and tingling on the right side in the thumb, long, and ring finger of the right wrist. Dr. Ollinger diagnosed right carpal tunnel syndrome and deQuervain's tenosynovitis, but opined that work was not the prevailing factor in the cause of the conditions. Instead, he cited Claimant's gender and smoking history as "risk" factors. Subsequently, the employer denied workers' compensation benefits therefore the Claimant sought treatment on her own.
  7. Claimant first saw Dr. Dysarz. He provided injections. The injections did not provide relief so she went to Dr. Koo. Dr. Koo performed a right endoscopic carpal tunnel

release, right flexor tenosynovectomy, and 1rst dorsal compartment release on May 18,2006.

  1. Claimant bumped her right wrist in June or July of 2006 and developed a contusion and relap

Full decision text continues in the plain-text archive copy.

Related Decisions

Cox v. Doe Run Company(2023)

January 17, 2023#19-108693

affirmed

The Commission affirmed the Administrative Law Judge's decision denying workers' compensation benefits to Brian Cox, finding no compensable occupational disease or accident under Missouri law. The case involved disputed causation regarding whether Cox's carpal tunnel syndrome arose from his employment duties at the smelter or loading dock positions.

carpal tunnel4,798 words

Otwell v. Chrysler, LLC(2022)

February 9, 2022#09-015610

modified

The Missouri Court of Appeals reversed the Commission's December 2020 award and remanded for reconsideration of whether the employee achieved permanent total disability status when combining her primary bilateral carpal tunnel injury with preexisting disabilities, including newly admitted vocational expert testimony and complete medical evaluation evidence. The Commission reconsidered the case on remand, admitting previously excluded vocational expert testimony documenting the employee's preexisting psychiatric disabilities (depression, PTSD, anxiety disorder) and modified its award accordingly.

carpal tunnel2,540 words

Lamy v. Stahl Specialty Company(2022)

January 21, 2022#17-105467

affirmed

The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirmed the administrative law judge's decision denying compensation for a work-related occupational disease injury to the employee's left wrist, finding the claim was barred by a prior settlement for left shoulder disability. A dissenting opinion argued the prior settlement only covered the shoulder injury and that the employer's authorization of medical testing suggested the wrist injury was compensable, but the majority affirmed the denial.

carpal tunnel4,378 words
affirmed

The Commission affirmed the Administrative Law Judge's award allowing permanent total disability compensation to Clifford Wolf against the Second Injury Fund, finding his primary carpal tunnel syndrome injury combined with preexisting disabilities from a prior back injury and polio rendered him permanently and totally disabled. The employee settled his primary claim for $35,500 based on 22.5% permanent partial disability of the right wrist and 20% of the left wrist.

carpal tunnel6,615 words
affirmed

The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirmed the Administrative Law Judge's award of workers' compensation to Kevin G. Young for carpal tunnel injuries, finding the award supported by competent and substantial evidence. The Commission upheld the ALJ's evidentiary rulings excluding certain statements that were not provided to the employee's attorney within the statutory thirty-day period required by Missouri law.

carpal tunnel10,088 words