Skip to content
Ott Law Firm

Nekesha Evans v. Manpower

Decision date: April 6, 201212 pages

Summary

The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirmed the Administrative Law Judge's decision denying workers' compensation benefits to Nekesha Evans for alleged right hand carpal tunnel syndrome. The Commission found that the alleged occupational disease did not arise out of and in the course of employment, rendering it non-compensable under Missouri law.

Archive Notice

This archive contains published Missouri Labor and Industrial Relations Commission workers' compensation decisions reproduced for research convenience. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Legal Help

Practical guidance for this decision

Third-Party Injury Check

This workers' comp decision may point to a separate injury claim.

  • A driver, contractor, property owner, or equipment company may share fault.
  • The injury involved a vehicle, unsafe premises, defective equipment, or a non-employer vendor.
  • A serious injury or death may need both benefits review and civil-claim analysis.

Caption

FINAL AWARD DENYING COMPENSATION

(Affirming Award and Decision of Administrative Law Judge)

Injury No.: 10-031122

Employee: Nekesha Evans

Employer: Manpower

Insurer: Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania c/o Sedgwick Claims Management Services

Additional Party: Treasurer of Missouri as Custodian of Second Injury Fund

The above-entitled workers' compensation case is submitted to the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) for review as provided by § 287.480 RSMo. Having reviewed the evidence and considered the whole record, the Commission finds that the award of the administrative law judge is supported by competent and substantial evidence and was made in accordance with the Missouri Workers' Compensation Law. Pursuant to $\S 286.090$ RSMo, the Commission affirms the award and decision of the administrative law judge dated July 19, 2011, and awards no compensation in the above-captioned case.

The award and decision of Administrative Law Judge Maureen Tilley, issued July 19, 2011, is attached and incorporated by this reference.

Given at Jefferson City, State of Missouri, this $5^{\text {th }}$ day of April 2012.

LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION

William F. Ringer, Chairman

James Avery, Member

Curtis E. Chick, Jr., Member

Attest:

Secretary

FINAL AWARD

Employee: Nekesha Evans

Injury No. 10-031122

Dependents: $\quad \mathrm{N} / \mathrm{A}$

Employer: Manpower

Additional Party: Second Injury Fund

Insurer: Sedgwick Claims Management Services

Hearing Date: April 19, 2011

Checked by: MT/rf

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS

  1. Are any benefits awarded herein? No.
  2. Was the injury or occupational disease compensable under Chapter 287? No.
  3. Was there an accident or incident of occupational disease under the Law? No.
  4. Date of alleged accident or onset of alleged occupational disease? 4-1-2010
  5. State location where alleged accident occurred or alleged occupational disease contracted: New Madrid County, Missouri.
  6. Was above employee in employ of above employer at time of alleged accident or occupational disease? Yes.
  7. Did employer receive proper notice? Yes.
  8. Did accident or occupational disease arise out of and in the course of the employment? No.
  9. Was claim for compensation filed within time required by law? Yes.
  10. Was employer insured by above insurer? Yes.
  1. Describe work employee was doing and how accident happened or occupational disease contracted: The employee alleged that she developed right hand carpal tunnel syndrome as a result of the work she performed.
  2. Did accident or occupational disease cause death? No.
  3. Parts of body allegedly injured by accident or occupational disease: Right hand.
  4. Nature and extent of any permanent disability: None.
  5. Compensation paid to date for temporary total disability: None.
  6. Value necessary medical aid paid to date by employer-insurer: None.
  7. Value necessary medical aid not furnished by employer-insurer: None.
  8. Employee's average weekly wage: $\ 393.95
  9. Weekly compensation rate: $\ 262.63
  10. Method wages computation: By agreement.
  11. Amount of compensation payable: None.
  12. Second Injury Fund liability: None.
  13. Future requirements awarded: None.

FINDINGS OF FACT AND RULINGS OF LAW

On April 19, 2011, the Employee appeared along with her attorney, Kim A. Heckemeyer, for a Hearing for a Temporary Award. The employer appeared by its attorney, Amy L. Young. The Second injury Fund was left open and therefore they were not represented at this hearing. At the time of the Hearing the parties agreed on certain undisputed facts and identified the issues that were in dispute. These undisputed facts and issues, together with a Summary of the Evidence and the Findings of Fact and Rulings of Law, are set forth below as follows:

UNDISPUTED FACTS:

  1. That on April 1, 2010 the Employer, Manpower, was operating under and subject to the provisions of the Missouri Workers' Compensation Act.
  2. That on April 1, 2010 Nekesha Evans was an employee of Manpower and was working under and subject to the Missouri Workers' Compensation Act.
  3. That on April 1, 2010 Nekesha Evans sustained an accident or occupational disease during the course of employment at Manpower.
  4. That the employer had notice of the employee's work injury that occurred on April 1, 2010.
  5. That the employee's claim was filed within the time allowed by law.
  6. That the average weekly wage for the injuries that occurred April 1, 2010 was $\ 393.95 and the rate of compensation for purposes of permanent partial and temporary total disability and permanent total disability is $\ 262.63.
  7. That no medical aid has been furnished by the employer-insurer.
  8. That if the claimant is found to be non-compensable then a Final Award will be issued.

ISSUES:

Several issues were identified.

  1. Occupational Disease.
  2. Medical Causation.
  3. Future Medical Treatment.
  4. Temporary Total Disability Benefits from April 28, 2010 through April 19, 2011 and on-going.

EXHIBITS:

Several Exhibits were offered and admitted into evidence:

Employee's Exhibits:

A. Medical records.

B. Report of Dr. Bruce Schlafly.

C. Deposition of Dr. Bruce Schlafly.

Employer's Exhibits:

  1. Medical records.
  2. Hourly work records.

Testimony of Nekesha Evans

Nekesha Evans, the employee testified that she was born in 1977 and is a single mother with two children, ages four and three. She attended high school through the $10^{\text {th }}$ grade. She has a GED. She attended a technical college but did not obtain a certificate.

The employee's first job after high school was working for McDonalds in approximately 2001. She worked as a crew member for approximately one and a half years. In 2001 or 2002, she went to work for Plasteen, an automotive company performing assembly line work for approximately two years. In 2003, she went back to work at McDonalds as a shift manager for about two years. In 2005 or 2006, she went to work at Super 8 as a night auditor for approximately one year. Her job responsibilities involved closing down and making sure the money and the books were correct. She left her job at Super 8 because she became pregnant and she took a year off of work. Then, she went back to work at Super 8 on a part-time basis as a night auditor for approximately 20-30 hours per week. She testified that she was a "reliever" and worked the night shift for about one to two years. In 2009, she took a second part-time job as an inspector for Missouri Grain. This was a seasonal job and her hours varied. She worked anywhere from one to twelve hours per day and was paid an hourly rate of $\ 8 per hour. She eventually quit working for Super 8 because she believed her part-time job at Missouri Grain was a better job opportunity.

On March 10, 2010, the employee began working for Manpower, a temp agency. She was assigned to work at Siegal Roberts, a company that molds automotive parts. She was assigned to work up to ten or more different molding machines and she would, clip, trim, and roll parts, then pack them in boxes. She rotated machines on a daily basis and would find out which machine she was assigned to when she reported to work that day. She used three different tools: clippers to cut plastic, a knife for trimming, and a brass bar to "roll plastic down". She used the clipper and knife with her right hand. She is right handed. She used her left hand to hold the parts. Her hourly quota depended upon the machine she was using. She worked the 1:00 pm to 9:00 pm shift. She testified that she was scheduled to work anywhere from 40 to 50 hours per week. During the week she had two ten minute breaks per day and on the weekends she had fifteen minute breaks. She also had a lunch break.

She testified that she started off working on machines \#17 and \#18. These machines made molds for automobile grills, and she was required to trim, cut, and clip the parts and put them in plastic and pack them in a box or crate. These parts were made out of plastic. She did not recall how many parts she worked on per hour. She testified that the most difficult machine

she used was machine \#23. She would get the part off the line, clip eight parts, and trim two parts. She testified the parts were made out of plastic. She testified that she is not good with measurements, but thought the parts were approximately one inch thick and the part was about as tall as her. She would put the part on the table and clip around it.

She testified that on the third day of working for Manpower her right hand swelled up and she experienced pain and numbness. She could not recall which machine she was working on at the time. She testified that she complained to the lead man at Siegal Roberts, but she did not report it to anyone at Manpower. She testified she reported symptoms a second time and was moved to a less difficult machine, \#25. This machine made plastic emblems. She was required to clip and roll the parts, put plastic on it, and put it in a box. She testified that these parts did not require as much pressure as machine \#23. She worked on this machine for one day. She testified her symptoms did not improve. She testified that all of her fingers hurt, but pain was worse in her thumb, index and middle fingers.

The employee testified that she was "let go" on April 28, 2010. Therefore, she worked for Manpower a total of 49 days. She stated that she had missed approximately three days of work during that time period. She testified that on April 28, 2010 she had to leave work for a migraine headache that was later diagnosed as a complex migraine. She called in to work to report what the doctor had told her and was informed that her assignment had ended. It was after she was "let go" that she asked a Human Resources representative at Manpower about treatment for her right hand. This was the first time she reported the symptoms to anyone at Manpower. She testified that had she not been let go that she could have continued to work.

Manpower sent Ms. Evans to Dr. Marsh for an evaluation. Dr. Marsh did not provide treatment. Manpower also sent her to Dr. Brown for a second opinion. She did not receive any treatment with Dr. Brown.

The employee testified that her symptoms have gotten worse since her employment with Manpower ended. She has been unemployed since her job assignment ended, and she has not looked for or applied for any other jobs. She has not sought any treatment on her own.

The employee is 5'1 tall and weighs approximately 220 pounds. She testified she weighed approximately 240 pounds at the time her symptoms began. The employee denied any hobbies or injuries outside of work. She testified that her symptoms interfere with her ability to tend to her housework and take care of her kids. She testified to difficulty holding and gripping things. She testified that on a pain scale of 1-10 her symptoms are past 10 if she overexerts herself. She testified it interferes with her ability to sleep. She denied any prior history of workers compensation claims. She denied any prior history of injury, symptoms, or treatment involving her right hand prior to working for Manpower. When questioned on cross-examination regarding a record from Pemiscot Memorial Hospital dated March 22, 2005 indicating an admitting diagnosis of right hand trauma, Ms. Evans denied any memory of the same.

The employee testified that she was diagnosed with hepatitis C in February of 2009. Her symptoms include flu-like symptoms, fatigue, and general achiness. She also has problems with anxiety and depression. She receives treatment from Dr. Arshad.

The employee was convicted of forgery in 2003 for writing and signing checks on her mother's checking account without her knowledge. She served time for four months in jail.

Summary of Timesheets

According to the timesheets, Ms. Evans' date of hire was March 10, 2011. In summary, the records show the following:

Week EndingHours worked
$3 / 14 / 10$31.75
$3 / 21 / 10$48
$3 / 28 / 10$40
$4 / 4 / 10$31.75
$4 / 11 / 10$52
$4 / 18 / 10$47.75
$4 / 25 / 10$44.75

Full decision text continues in the plain-text archive copy.

Related Decisions

Cox v. Doe Run Company(2023)

January 17, 2023#19-108693

affirmed

The Commission affirmed the Administrative Law Judge's decision denying workers' compensation benefits to Brian Cox, finding no compensable occupational disease or accident under Missouri law. The case involved disputed causation regarding whether Cox's carpal tunnel syndrome arose from his employment duties at the smelter or loading dock positions.

carpal tunnel4,798 words

Otwell v. Chrysler, LLC(2022)

February 9, 2022#09-015610

modified

The Missouri Court of Appeals reversed the Commission's December 2020 award and remanded for reconsideration of whether the employee achieved permanent total disability status when combining her primary bilateral carpal tunnel injury with preexisting disabilities, including newly admitted vocational expert testimony and complete medical evaluation evidence. The Commission reconsidered the case on remand, admitting previously excluded vocational expert testimony documenting the employee's preexisting psychiatric disabilities (depression, PTSD, anxiety disorder) and modified its award accordingly.

carpal tunnel2,540 words

Lamy v. Stahl Specialty Company(2022)

January 21, 2022#17-105467

affirmed

The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirmed the administrative law judge's decision denying compensation for a work-related occupational disease injury to the employee's left wrist, finding the claim was barred by a prior settlement for left shoulder disability. A dissenting opinion argued the prior settlement only covered the shoulder injury and that the employer's authorization of medical testing suggested the wrist injury was compensable, but the majority affirmed the denial.

carpal tunnel4,378 words
affirmed

The Commission affirmed the Administrative Law Judge's award allowing permanent total disability compensation to Clifford Wolf against the Second Injury Fund, finding his primary carpal tunnel syndrome injury combined with preexisting disabilities from a prior back injury and polio rendered him permanently and totally disabled. The employee settled his primary claim for $35,500 based on 22.5% permanent partial disability of the right wrist and 20% of the left wrist.

carpal tunnel6,615 words
affirmed

The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirmed the Administrative Law Judge's award of workers' compensation to Kevin G. Young for carpal tunnel injuries, finding the award supported by competent and substantial evidence. The Commission upheld the ALJ's evidentiary rulings excluding certain statements that were not provided to the employee's attorney within the statutory thirty-day period required by Missouri law.

carpal tunnel10,088 words