Lisa Bush v. Westchester House
Decision date: February 13, 20133 pages
Summary
The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission modified the ALJ's temporary award, reversing the award of six weeks of temporary total disability benefits for carpal tunnel syndrome surgery due to insufficient evidence of the employee's inability to compete in the open labor market. The Commission left the issue of temporary total disability benefits open for determination at final award, pending additional evidence regarding the employee's work capacity and time missed from work.
Caption
TEMPORARY AWARD ALLOWING COMPENSATION
(Modifying Award and Decision of Administrative Law Judge)
Injury No.: 10-109482
Employee: Lisa Bush
Employer: Westchester House
Insurer: Old Republic Insurance Company
Additional Party: Treasurer of Missouri as Custodian of Second Injury Fund (Open)
The above-entitled workers' compensation case is submitted to the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) for review as provided by $\S 287.480 RSMo. { }^{1}$ We have reviewed the evidence and briefs, and considered the whole record. Pursuant to § 286.090 RSMo, we issue this temporary award modifying the August 28, 2012, temporary or partial award of the administrative law judge (ALJ). We adopt the findings, conclusions, decision, and award of the ALJ to the extent that they are not inconsistent with the findings, conclusions, decision, and modifications set forth below.
TTD Benefits
The ALJ awarded employee, among other things, six weeks of temporary total disability benefits as a result of the left wrist carpal tunnel syndrome release surgery performed on November 12, 2010. The ALJ based this award on Dr. Crandall's testimony that a surgery, such as the one performed on employee, generally requires six weeks of recovery.
Section 287.020.6 RSMo defines "total disability" as the "inability to return to any employment and not merely [the] inability to return to the employment in which the employee was engaged at the time of the accident." The court in Cooper v. Medical Center of Independence, 95 S.W.2d 570 (Mo. App. 1997) summarized the law on temporary total disability benefits, as follows:
'Temporary total disability' is a judicial creation that is defined by case law and not by statute. See Herring v. Yellow Freight System, Inc., 914 S.W.2d 816, 820 (Mo. App. 1995). The purpose of temporary disability awards is to cover the employee's healing period. Id. Temporary total disability benefits should be awarded only for the period before the employee can return to work. Williams v. Pillsbury Co., 694 S.W.2d 488, 489 (Mo. App. 1985). Temporary total disability awards are owed until the claimant can find employment or the condition has reached the point of maximum medical progress. Vinson v. Curators of Univ. of Missouri, 822 S.W.2d 504, 508 (Mo. App. 1991). A temporary award is not warranted when further progress is not expected. Phelps v. Jeff Wolk Const. Co., 803 S.W.2d 641, 646 (Mo. App. 1991).
[^0]
[^0]: ${ }^{1}$ Statutory references are to the Revised Statutes of Missouri 2009, unless otherwise indicated.
In determining whether an employee is totally disabled, the main issue is 'whether any employer, in the usual course of business, would reasonably be expected to employ the [employee] in [the employee's] present physical condition.' Brookman v. Henry Transp., 924 S.W.2d 286, 290 (Mo. App. 1996).
Id. at 575 .
While testimony was presented at the hardship hearing regarding employee's left wrist carpal tunnel syndrome release surgery, there is no testimony in the record regarding employee's ability to compete in the open labor market or the total amount of time she missed from work due to the November 12, 2010, surgery. Due to this lack of evidence, we find that for purposes of this temporary award, employee has failed to meet her burden of proving her entitlement to the six weeks of temporary total disability benefits awarded by the ALJ. Therefore, we reverse the ALJ's award of six weeks of temporary total disability benefits. In light of the currently limited record, this issue of temporary total disability benefits is more appropriately addressed in the event this case proceeds to a final award. Accordingly, we leave open the issue of employee's entitlement to temporary total disability benefits.
Treatment by Specific Doctor
In addition to the aforementioned, we must also address the ALJ's decision to award treatment with a specific physician. The ALJ ordered "[a] change in provider to Dr. Glogovac ... pursuant to Section 287.140.2 RSMo (2005)."
Section 287.140.2 RSMo provides, as follows:
If it be shown to the [Di]vision or the [C]ommission that the requirements are being furnished in such a manner that there is reasonable ground for believing that the life, health, or recovery of the employee is endangered thereby, the [D]ivision or the [C]omission may order a change in the physician, surgeon, hospital or other requirement.
First of all, employee has not proven that employer waived its right to direct employee's medical treatment. The ALJ did not even make that specific finding in his award. Secondly, employee has failed to prove that her health and recovery has been endangered by the medical treatment provided by employer. Lastly, even if employee met this burden, the only relief provided under $\S 287.140 .2$ RSMo is that " the [D]ivision or the [C]ommission may order a change in the physician, surgeon, hospital or other requirement." (Emphasis added). Section 287.140.2 RSMo does not authorize the Division or the Commission to appoint a specific doctor to provide the employee's medical treatment.
For the foregoing reasons, we find that the ALJ erred in ordering employee's additional medical treatment be provided specifically by Dr. Glogovac.
Decision
We reverse the ALJ's award of six weeks of temporary total disability benefits, but, as discussed above, we leave the issue open for further determination.
We find that employee has established she is entitled to additional medical treatment to cure and relieve her of the effects of her work-related carpal tunnel syndrome and affirm the ALJ's award ordering employer to provide the same. We find that the ALJ erred in ordering employee's additional medical treatment be provided specifically by Dr. Glogovac. Employer has not waived its right to select the physician to provide said treatment.
We affirm the ALJ's temporary or partial award with respect to all other issues not specifically addressed herein.
The award and decision of Administrative Law Judge Joseph E. Denigan, issued August 28, 2012, is attached hereto and incorporated herein to the extent it is not inconsistent with this temporary award.
This award is only temporary or partial. It is subject to further order, and the proceedings are hereby continued and kept open until a final award can be made. All parties should be aware of the provisions of $\S 287.510$ RSMo.
The Commission further approves and affirms the administrative law judge's allowance of attorney's fee herein as being fair and reasonable.
Any past due compensation shall bear interest as provided by law.
Given at Jefferson City, State of Missouri, this $13^{\text {th }}$ day of February 2013.
LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION
V A C A N T
Chairman
James Avery, Member
Curtis E. Chick, Jr., Member
Attest:
Related Decisions
Cox v. Doe Run Company(2023)
January 17, 2023#19-108693
The Commission affirmed the Administrative Law Judge's decision denying workers' compensation benefits to Brian Cox, finding no compensable occupational disease or accident under Missouri law. The case involved disputed causation regarding whether Cox's carpal tunnel syndrome arose from his employment duties at the smelter or loading dock positions.
Otwell v. Chrysler, LLC(2022)
February 9, 2022#09-015610
The Missouri Court of Appeals reversed the Commission's December 2020 award and remanded for reconsideration of whether the employee achieved permanent total disability status when combining her primary bilateral carpal tunnel injury with preexisting disabilities, including newly admitted vocational expert testimony and complete medical evaluation evidence. The Commission reconsidered the case on remand, admitting previously excluded vocational expert testimony documenting the employee's preexisting psychiatric disabilities (depression, PTSD, anxiety disorder) and modified its award accordingly.
Lamy v. Stahl Specialty Company(2022)
January 21, 2022#17-105467
The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirmed the administrative law judge's decision denying compensation for a work-related occupational disease injury to the employee's left wrist, finding the claim was barred by a prior settlement for left shoulder disability. A dissenting opinion argued the prior settlement only covered the shoulder injury and that the employer's authorization of medical testing suggested the wrist injury was compensable, but the majority affirmed the denial.
Wolf v. Duckett Creek Sewer District(2021)
August 25, 2021#14-105395
The Commission affirmed the Administrative Law Judge's award allowing permanent total disability compensation to Clifford Wolf against the Second Injury Fund, finding his primary carpal tunnel syndrome injury combined with preexisting disabilities from a prior back injury and polio rendered him permanently and totally disabled. The employee settled his primary claim for $35,500 based on 22.5% permanent partial disability of the right wrist and 20% of the left wrist.
Young v. Linmark Machine Products, Inc.(2021)
June 7, 2021#03-051173
The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirmed the Administrative Law Judge's award of workers' compensation to Kevin G. Young for carpal tunnel injuries, finding the award supported by competent and substantial evidence. The Commission upheld the ALJ's evidentiary rulings excluding certain statements that were not provided to the employee's attorney within the statutory thirty-day period required by Missouri law.