Regarding stipulations the parties stipulated to the following:
1) That the Employee and the Employer were operating subject to Missouri's compensation law on April 7, 2011;
2) That Mr. Elder was an employee working subject to the law;
3) That jurisdiction is proper in Kansas City, Missouri;
4) That Mr. Elder sustained an accident that arose out of and in the course of his employment on April 7, 2011;
5) That proper notice was given;
6) That the claim was filed within the time allowed by law;
7) That the Employee's permanent total disability rate was $\ 634.17;
8) That the Employer had provided 55 weeks of temporary total disability benefits in the amount of $\ 34,879.35;
9) That the Employer had provided medical expenses in the amount of $\ 139,149.48.
Claimant, age 65, has worked driving trucks since 1998. Prior to 1998, Claimant worked at unskilled positions within the open labor market. Claimant completed the $8^{\text {th }}$ grade and never received a GED. On April 7, 2011, Claimant was involved in a severe motor vehicle accident when his truck swerved off the highway to avoid an oncoming car. The truck Claimant drove caught on fire and he was hospitalized for severe burns from April $7^{\text {th }} to April 19^{\text {th }}$. He suffered burns over 6 percent of his body, as well as suffered respiratory insufficiency due to the trauma he suffered in the accident. Claimant also suffered from a cervical fracture of the C2 level, difficulty with vision due to floaters of the right eye, and traumatic cubital tunnel syndrome on the left. Claimant also was diagnosed with profound hearing loss on the right side secondary to the traumatic head injury from the accident.
Claimant saw various doctors after his release from the hospital on April 19. Claimant went to a Dr. Leibson who treated Claimant for detachment of the optic nerve. Claimant was also treated by Dr. MacMillan who performed a cervical fusion from C1-C2 levels on September of 2011. Dr. MacMillan also treated Claimant for left shoulder impingement syndrome, rotator cuff tear, and left cubital tunnel
Issued by DIVISION OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION
Employee: Robert Elder
syndrome as a result of the motor vehicle accident. Dr. MacMillan on April 26, 2012 rated Claimant 30 percent per impairment for the cervical spine with 5 percent pre-existing and 10 percent of the left upper extremity with respect to traumatic cubital tunnel syndrome. Dr. MacMillan then released Claimant with light/medium restrictions of occasional lifting of 20 to 35 pounds, lifting frequently up to 15 pounds, and lifting constant up to 7 pounds. Dr. MacMillan informed Claimant that he could not return driving commercial trucks.
Currently, Claimant has nightmares at least two to three times per week regarding the motor vehicle accident. Claimant avoids driving due to loss of motion of his neck and has ongoing neck pain to the point he is unable to rotate his neck and his ability to look up is limited. Claimant also has profound hearing loss on the right side since this injury and now wears a hearing aid, which at hearing he testified he lost his hearing aid device. Claimant has now medial left elbow pain with persistent tingling and numbness into the left and little fingers. Claimant as a result of the burn injuries has sensitivity of the sun and has difficulty with sun exposure on his arms and scalp. Claimant has severe weakness of his left shoulder and loss of motion, as well as ongoing left shoulder pain.
Prior to April 7, 2011, Claimant discussed his prior injuries and medical treatment. Claimant had prior low back complaints dating all the way back to 1998. Claimant took pain medication to alleviate the low back pain but testified he worked full time without restrictions as a truck driver. Claimant also sustained a 2008 injury of his forearm, a bypass surgery in 2003, and a right heel injury in 2007, that I find did not limit his ability to perform his job duties prior to April of 2011.
Claimant presented the experts of Dr. Brent Koprivica and vocational expert Michael Dreiling. Claimant's experts both state that Claimant is permanently and totally disabled based on the last accident alone. Dreiling, Claimant's vocational expert, found no reasonable employer would hire Claimant in the open labor market based on the restrictions of Dr. Koprivica and the authorized treating physician's restrictions. Indeed, Dr. Koprivica gave severe restrictions as outline in Claimant's Exhibit G, Deposition Exhibit 1. I agree with Claimant's own experts and find Claimant is permanently and totally disabled solely on the April 7, 2011 accident. This finding is based on the overwhelming weight of evidence presented including the medical testimony and records. Although Claimant sustained prior injuries that resulted in permanent partial disability, I find based on the evidence presented that it is the sequela of the April 7, 2011 accident which caused him to be unemployable in the open labor market. The Second Injury Fund is not liable to Claimant for permanent total disability benefits or permanent partial disability benefits because I find no synergistic effect of the primary injury with his pre-existing conditions.