Employee testified at the hearing in support of his claim. Additionally, Employee offered the following exhibits into evidence, which were admitted without objection, with the exception of a portion of Exhibit 7, to which the Second Injury Fund objected, and which objection, and ruling thereon, is noted below.
Exhibit 1
Photos of Employee Pants and Shoes from DOI
Exhibit 3. Attorney Client Contract and Expenses (\$7,197.48)
Exhibit 5. Dr. David Volarich (Letter, IME Report \& CV)
Exhibit 6. Dr. Michael Snyder (Letter, IME Report \& CV)
Exhibit 7. Stella Doering Deposition with Exhibits (12/05/16)
Exhibit 8. Kristine Skahan Deposition with Exhibits (12/19/16)
Exhibit 11. Certified Medical Records
(Health Care Providers: 11A - Fitzgibbon Hospital, 11B - Peak Sport \& Spine, 11C - Peak
Performance, 11D - UM Health, 11E - Jefferson City Medical Group, 11F - Heartland Medical
Equipment, 11G - Boone Hospital Center)
Exhibit 12. Expenses 2 (\$96.92)
Exhibit 13. Hold Harmless Agreement (Employer/Insurer \& Employee)
Exhibit 17. Gale Hardwick Deposition (10/07/15)
Exhibit 18. Conagra Nurse Notes
The Employer offered no testimony but did offer the following Exhibits, which were admitted into evidence.
Exhibit A. Terry Cordray Deposition with Exhibits (03/22/2017)
Exhibit B. Gale Hardwick Social Security Application (05/10/15)
*Second Injury Fund Objection Overruled
Exhibit D Dr. David Clymer (Letter, IME Report \& CV)
Employer-Insurer offered Exhibit C "Social Security Disability Determination" which was not admitted into evidence following an objection by the Second Injury Fund.
The Second Injury Fund offered no evidence.
Ruling on SIF objection to portion of Exhibit 7. The Second Injury Fund propounded objections to a portion of the June 23, 2016 narrative report of Stella Doering, contained on pages 14-15 of that report (Bates stamped as "0091" and "0092").
The last paragraph of "0091" quotes what appears to be a medical treatise regarding Klinefelter's Syndrome and its possible effects on individuals with that syndrome. Ms. Doering is not a physician. No physician has opined in this case regarding the effects, if any, of Klinefelter's Syndrome on Claimant. The objection to that paragraph is sustained, and that paragraph is not admitted.
The first paragraph of "0092" quotes what appears to be a medical or psychological treatise or study regarding Klinefelter's Syndrome and its potential effect on learning skills. No physician or psychologist has opined in this case regarding the effects, if any, of Klinefelter's Syndrome on Claimant. The objection to that paragraph is sustained, and that paragraph is not admitted.