If any party shall die pending any proceedings under this chapter, the same shall not abate, but on notice to the parties may be revived and proceed in favor of the successor to the rights or against the personal representative of the party liable, in like manner as in civil actions.
16 Claimant's Exhibit 11, Transcript, 542.
17 See Abel by and Through Abel v. Mike Russell's Standard Serv., 901 S.W.2d 299 (Mo App. 1995).
MNKOI 0000816998
Injury No.: 13-020414
Employee: Joan Knutter, deceased
- 9 -
Missouri courts have consistently instructed, "[u]nder the Workers' Compensation Act, substantial rights are to be enforced at the sacrifice of procedural rights."18
Employer/insurer objected to the employee's Motion primarily on the basis that § 287.230 provides no legal basis for substitution of a party on the death of a dependent, as opposed to the employee.
On October 28, 2015, after oral argument on the Motion, ALJ Holden issued an order finding, inter alia, that Michael Knutter is the personal representative of Karl Knutter and the only person entitled to the proceeds of this workers' compensation claim. The ALJ granted claimant Michael Knutter's Motion and ordered, pursuant to § 287.580, that Michael Knutter be substituted as the claimant in this matter.19
Employer/insurer argues that pursuant to § 287.800, the Worker Compensation Law's strict construction mandate, the ALJ improperly substituted Michael Knutter as the successor to claimant Karl Knutter's rights because the Motion for Substitution of Party and Suggestion of Death filed with the Division on July 31, 2015, referenced only § 287.230 RSMo and failed to reference § 287.380.20 We note that the Supreme Court's recent decision in Accident Fund Insurance Company; E. J. Cody Company, Inc., v. Robert Casey, citing the statutory mandate that workers' compensation proceedings "be simple, informal and summary"21 found that an amended claim naming the employee's widow and children and her attorney's oral motion for substitution of parties within ninety days constituted a de facto suggestion of death and was sufficient to substitute both the widow and eight surviving children because this process "substantially tracked the procedural rules and was 'in like manner as in civil actions' as required under § 287.580."
Based on claimant Michael Knutter's Motion for Substitution of Party and Suggestion of Death and the ALJ's October 28, 2015 Order substituting Michael Knutter as the successor to the rights of dependent claimant Karl Knutter, we find we have jurisdiction to decide this dispute.
Medical Causation
Section 287.020.3(1) RSMo sets forth the standard of medical causation applicable to this claim, and provides, in relevant part, as follows:
An injury by accident is compensable only if the accident was the prevailing factor in causing both the resulting medical condition and
18 Hale v. Treasurer of Mo., 164 S.W.3d 184 (Mo App. 2005). See also Parsons v. Steelman Transp., Inc., 335 S.W.3d 6, 18 (Mo. App. 2011); Clark v. FAG Bearings Corp., 134 S.W.3d 730, 736 (Mo. App. 2004); Seeley v. Anchor Fence Co., 96 S.W.3d 809, 816 (Mo. App. 2002); Crowell v. Hawkins, 68 S.W.3d 432, 441 (Mo. App. 2001); Lorenz v. Sweetheart Cup Co., 60 S.W.3d 677, 683 (Mo. App. 2001); Elking v. Deaconess Hosp., 996 S.W.2d 718 (Mo. App. 1999); Wiele v. National Super Mkts., 948 S.W.2d 142, 146 (Mo. App. 1997); and Vogt v. Ford Motor Co., 138 S.W.2d 684, 686 (Mo. App. 1940).
19 Claimant's Exhibit 11, Transcript, 542.
20 Claimant's Exhibit 10, Id. 537.
21 Section 287.550 RSMo.
Injury No.: 13-020414
Employee: Joan Knutter, deceased
- 10 -
disability. "The prevailing factor" is defined to be the primary factor, in relation to any other factor, causing both the resulting medical condition and disability.
Section 287.020.3 (4) RSMo provides:
A cardiovascular, pulmonary, respiratory, or other disease, or cerebrovascular accident or myocardial infarction suffered by a worker is an injury only if the accident is the prevailing factor in causing the resulting medical condition.
As we have found, based on the expert opinions of Dr. Mitchell Mullins and Dr. Thomas Wright, the employee's forty-five day immobilization related to treatment for the ankle fracture she suffered in a March 25, 2013, compensable injury was the prevailing factor causing her venous stasis, which led to a saddle pulmonary embolism and death on May 9, 2013.
Temporary Total Disability
Sections 287.149 and 287.170 RSMo provide for the payment of temporary total disability benefits while an employee is engaged in the rehabilitative process following a compensable work injury. *Greer v. Sysco Food Servs.*, 475 S.W.3d 655 (Mo. 2015).
The ALJ's award includes a list of written stipulations by the parties that includes the fact that employee Joan Knutter was underpaid temporary total disability benefits in the amount of $116.48.22
Employer/insurer bases its objection to an award of additional temporary total disability based on its argument that Michael Knutter was never properly substituted as a successor pursuant to § 287.580. In that we have rejected the employer/insurer's argument on the issue of substitution of parties and proper designation of Michael Knutter as Karl Knutter's successor with respect to this claim, we find that employee is entitled to, and employer is obligated to pay, temporary total disability benefits in the amount of $116.48.
Death Benefits
At hearing, and as documented in the ALJ's award, the parties' stipulated that death benefits in the amount of $43,160.00 were in dispute.23 Consistent with our findings, supra, we find that death benefits in this amount had accrued and become payable as of the time of dependent Karl Knutter's death on July 17, 2015, and that employer/insurer are liable to claimant Michael Knutter therefor.
22 Award, Exhibit A.
23 Id.
Injury No.: 13-020414
Employee: Joan Knutter, deceased
- 11 -