Skip to content
Ott Law Firm

Mark Lynch v. Anheuser Busch Companies, Inc.

Decision date: January 28, 2022Injury #09-03948509-10118825 pages

Summary

The Missouri Court of Appeals reversed the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission's denial of permanent total disability benefits for Mark Lynch, finding the Second Injury Fund liable for PTD benefits commencing August 1, 2011. The court remanded the case with instructions to award PTD benefits at a differential rate initially and then at the stipulated rate for the remainder of the employee's lifetime.

Archive Notice

This archive contains published Missouri Labor and Industrial Relations Commission workers' compensation decisions reproduced for research convenience. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Legal Help

Practical guidance for this decision

Third-Party Injury Check

This workers' comp decision may point to a separate injury claim.

  • A driver, contractor, property owner, or equipment company may share fault.
  • The injury involved a vehicle, unsafe premises, defective equipment, or a non-employer vendor.
  • A serious injury or death may need both benefits review and civil-claim analysis.

Caption

FINAL AWARD ALLOWING COMPENSATION (After Mandate from the Missouri Court of Appeals for the Eastern District)
Employee:Mark Lynch
Employer:Anheuser Busch Companies, Inc. (settled)
Insurer:Indemnity Insurance Company of North America (settled)
Additional Party:Treasurer of Missouri as Custodian of Second Injury Fund
On October 19, 2021, the Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, issued an opinion in Mark Lynch vs. Treasurer of the State of Missouri, Custodian of the Second Injury Fund, (ED109502, October 19, 2021). By mandate dated November 9, 2021, the court confirmed its decision to reverse the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission’s award and decision and remanded this matter to the Commission with instructions to enter an award consistent with the court’s opinion.
Therefore, pursuant to the court’s express directive and mandate, as authorized by Article V, Section 18. Constitution of Missouri, we issue the following award.
Award
The Second Injury Fund (SIF) is liable to the employee for permanent total disability (PTD) benefits commencing August 1, 2011, when Dr. Dwight Woiteshek declared that the employee reached maximum medical improvement. The parties stipulated a PTD rate of 772.53 and a PPD rate of 404.56.¹ Based on the employer/insurer’s settlement of Injury No. 09-039485 based on approximate permanent partial disability (PPD) of 5% of the body as a whole referable to alleged bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus (20 weeks), and employer/insurer’s settlement of Injury No. 09-101188 based on approximate disability of 20% of both hands plus a 10% load (77 weeks) the SIF owes employee PTD weekly benefits starting August 1, 2011, at the differential rate of 367.97 for 97 weeks and thereafter at the stipulated PTD rate of 772.53 per week for the remainder of the employee’s lifetime or until suspended if the employee is restored to his regular work or its equivalent as provided in § 287.200 RSMo.
For necessary legal services rendered to the employee, Mr. Phillip A Tatlow, Attorney at Law, is allowed a fee of 25% of the compensation awarded, which shall constitute a lien on said compensation.
Any past due compensation shall bear interest as provided by law.

Imployee: Mark Lynch

- 2 -

Injury Nos.: 09-039485

09-101188

Given at Jefferson City, State of Missouri, this **28th** day of January 2022.

LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION

![img-0.jpeg](img-0.jpeg)

Robert W. Cornejo, Chairman

Reid K. Forrester, Member

Shalonn K. Curls, Member

**Attest:**

**Reid K. Curls**, Secretary

In the Alissouri Court of Appeals Eastern Bistrict

MANDATE

MARK LYNCH,

Claimant/Appellant,

vs.

TREASURER OF THE STATE MISSOURI AS CUSTODIAN OF THE SECOND INJURY FUND,

Additional Party/

Respondent.

The court, being sufficiently advised of and having considered the premises, adjudges that the order rendered by the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission in Injury Nos. 09101188 \& 09-039485 be reversed as to its decision that the Fund is not liable for Claimant's permanent and total disability and remanded to the aforesaid Commission with instructions to enter an award consistent with this Court's opinion delivered October 19, 2021 .

STATE OF MISSOURI, ss.

I, LAURA THIELMEIER ROY, Clerk of the Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, certify that the above and foregoing is a full, true and complete transcript of the judgment rendered in the above entitled cause, as fully as the same remains of record in my office.

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of said Court, at office, in the City of St. Louis this 9th day of November, 2021.

[Signature]

Clerk, Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District.

DIVISION THREE

**MARK LYNCH,**

**Claimant/Appellant,**

vs.

**TREASURER OF THE STATE OF MISSOURI, CUSTODIAN OF THE SECOND INJURY FUND,**

**Respondent.**

No. ED109502

Appeal from the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission

Injury Nos. 09-101188 and 09-039485

Filed: October 19, 2021

The claimant, Mark Lynch, appeals from the final award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission denying his claim against the Second Injury Fund ("the Fund") for permanent total disability benefits. We find the Commission ignored the uncontradicted and unimpeached evidence, including the only qualified expert medical opinion in the record, without explanation and without a reasonable basis for finding the witnesses not credible, and instead substituted its own theory of the cause of Claimant's permanent total disability. We find the Commission's award concluding the Fund is not liable for Claimant's permanent and total disability is not supported by sufficient competent evidence and is against the overwhelming weight of the evidence. We reverse and remand the decision of the Commission.

Factual and Procedural Background

Claimant worked for Anheuser-Busch Companies, Inc. ("the employer") as a brewery worker from 1974 until his retirement in January 2009. During his 35 years with the employer,

Claimant worked in the draft beer and kettle departments, performing physically demanding and often repetitive tasks such as driving a forklift to move and stack pallets and barrels; cleaning kettles measuring 15 to 20 feet high; carrying 10-gallon buckets of ingredients from another floor to the kettles and dumping the buckets into the kettles at least 50 times per day; breaking up large bales of compressed hops so the hops could be crumbled and weighed; dumping 100-pound containers of hops into kettles 13 times per day; and pushing 1,000-pound containers filled with used beechwood chips through the brewery. Claimant estimated that when he worked as a brewer with the kettles, he had to pull open and push closed the kettles' vacuum-sealed doors, which weigh about 100 pounds, as many as 100 times per day. He filled and sealed kegs of beer, which required using a mallet to pound a stopper into the keg opening some 1,200 times a day. Claimant also had to regularly hand-loosen and hand-tighten large hinges on the doors of the mash cookers, and he had to repeatedly adjust steam valves, often by using a heavy mallet to strike a stuck valve handle.

Claimant sustained numerous injuries over the course of his career. He injured his neck and low back in a boating accident in 1990, and experienced ongoing pain thereafter, obtaining treatment from Dr. Al Vellinga both before and after retirement. Claimant later sustained two work-related injuries to his low back, the claims for which he settled with his employer. He underwent surgery on his left shoulder in 1991, and later settled a claim with the Fund. He sustained a work-related injury to his right shoulder in 1995, and underwent his first right shoulder surgery. Claimant settled the claim for his right shoulder injury with his employer. Claimant sought treatment for pain in his right shoulder shortly before his retirement, and underwent a second surgery on his right shoulder immediately after his January 2009 retirement. In 2003, Claimant sought treatment for increasing pain and stiffness in his hips, and underwent

total replacement of both hips. Claimant was diagnosed with osteoarthritis in both knees the year before he retired, and x-rays also revealed progression of arthritis around his right hip.

Claimant sought treatment from Dr. Vellinga with primary complaints of neck and low back pain one month after his retirement and right shoulder surgery. Although not acknowledged in the Commission's decision, Dr. Vellinga's records dated February 11, 2009 report Claimant also complained of weakness of the right upper extremity along with numbness and paresthesia of his right hand. 1 Throughout the spring of 2009, Claimant continued to report numbness and paresthesia in his right hand. Dr. Vellinga found Claimant's right hand grasp was weak, and referred him to neurologist Dr. Robert Margolis. Claimant consulted Dr. Margolis five months after retiring for numbness and tingling in his hands and feet, underwent EMGs and nerve conduction studies ordered by Dr. Margolis, and received a diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. Claimant sought treatment for his carpal tunnel syndrome from Dr. Vic Glogovac in September 2009, and filed workers' compensation claims for injury to his hands and ears in December 2009. In the fall of 2010, Claimant underwent a carpal tunnel release on each wrist performed by Dr. Glogovac. In 2011, Claimant was examined by Dr. Mitchell Rotman, a physician hired by the employer. Claimant reported to Dr. Rotman that the surgery had not alleviated the symptoms in his hands. Claimant settled with the employer in 2015 for 20% permanent partial disability of each wrist with a 10% loading factor. He continued with his claim for permanent total disability benefits against the Fund. Claimant alleged he is permanently and totally disabled as a result of a combination of his carpal tunnel syndrome and his preexisting conditions.

1 "Paresthesia refers to a burning or prickling sensation that is usually felt in the hands, arms, legs, or feet, but can also occur in other parts of the body." National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Paresthesia Information Page, available at https://www.ninds.nih.gov/Disorders/All-Disorders/Paresthesia-Information-Page (last visited Sept. 23, 2021).

MNKOI 0000716578

The claim against the Fund was heard before an administrative law judge ("ALJ"). The Fund contested the date of injury and notice to the employer, which are not at issue in this appeal. The parties stipulated that Claimant suffered an occupational disease in the course and scope of his employment with the employer; that his permanent total disability rate was 772.53 per week; and that his permanent partial disability rate was 404.56 per week. The Fund did not contest the amount of permanent partial disability previously reached via settlement with the employer. The parties further stipulated that the only other issue for determination at the hearing was the nature and extent, if any, of the Fund's liability. The ALJ issued an award in favor of the Fund. Claimant appealed to the Commission. In adopting and affirming the ALJ's award, the Commission accordingly found that Claimant developed an occupational disease arising out of and in the course of his employment by performing repetitive motion tasks.

At the hearing before the ALJ, Claimant testified he experienced pain, tingling, and numbness in his hands for over 20 years while working for the employer, including at the time of his retirement. He described how employees were instructed to do a "swimmer's shake" to relieve pain and numbness in their hands. Claimant testified he needed help from other workers to complete his job duties, relied on the advancement of technology, and struggled with the heavy lifting required to perform his job. He stated he was no longer physically able to perform his job duties because of the combination of the ringing in his ears, his carpal tunnel syndrome, and all of his prior injuries.

Claimant submitted the complete medical report of board-certified orthopedic surgeon Dr. Dwight Woiteshek, pursuant to section 287.210 RSMo. (2016), and the report and deposition testimony of vocational consultant Terry Cordray.² Dr. Woiteshek evaluated Claimant in 2011,

² All statutory references are to RSMo. (2016) except as otherwise indicated. Section 287.210 provides in relevant part:

MNKOI 0000714466

and found Claimant permanently and totally disabled. Dr. Woiteshek opined that Claimant's "pre-existing disabilities discussed above [low back, neck, both shoulders, and both hips] synergistically combines with the primary work related repetitious traumatic injuries leading up to and including 1/15/09, also discussed above, to create a substantially greater overall disability than the independent sum of the disabilities." Dr. Woiteshek further artic

Full decision text continues in the plain-text archive copy.

Related Decisions

Fields v. Southwest Airlines(2020)

September 22, 2020#12-107133

affirmed

The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirmed the administrative law judge's denial of compensation, finding that the employee failed to prove permanent total disability resulted from the combination of hearing loss and preexisting conditions sufficient to establish Second Injury Fund liability. The decision addresses the application of amended statutory provisions effective January 1, 2014, requiring specific criteria for Second Injury Fund claims involving occupational disease injuries.

hearing loss7,763 words

Schlereth v. Aramark(2019)

March 29, 2019#14-077190

affirmed

The Commission affirmed the Administrative Law Judge's decision denying workers' compensation benefits for an employee who sustained hearing loss (ringing in the ears) after being assaulted by a subordinate and falling against a washing machine. Although the injury was found to be compensable and work-related, no compensation was awarded due to the absence of permanent disability.

hearing loss4,492 words
affirmed

The Commission affirmed the administrative law judge's award allowing workers' compensation for David Hogenmiller's hearing loss and tinnitus, finding the ALJ properly admitted expert testimony from an audiologist regarding medical causation. The Commission rejected the employer/insurer's challenge to the admissibility of the audiologist's opinions, determining that non-physician experts with specialized knowledge in medical matters may qualify to testify on causation.

hearing loss6,850 words
affirmed

The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirmed the administrative law judge's award of permanent partial disability compensation in the amount of $9,291.60 for employee Jimmy Holifield's occupational hearing loss (tinnitus) caused by noise exposure at Mississippi Lime Company. The injury occurred on June 1, 2014, in Ste. Genevieve County, Missouri, and was determined to be compensable under Missouri Workers' Compensation Law.

hearing loss1,951 words
affirmed

The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirmed the Administrative Law Judge's award of workers' compensation benefits for Joseph Abt's occupational hearing loss in his left ear caused by industrial noise exposure. The employee was awarded $637.36 in permanent partial disability compensation at a rate of $433.58 per week, with the claim properly filed and all procedural requirements satisfied.

hearing loss6,974 words