Skip to content
Ott Law Firm

Donald Brown v. Noranda Aluminum, Inc.

Decision date: February 3, 2023Injury #16-02710219 pages

Summary

The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirmed the administrative law judge's award granting permanent total disability compensation to Donald Brown for his work-related injuries to his back and left elbow. The Commission rejected the Second Injury Fund's argument that an anxiety disability should be considered in the PTD determination, finding that non-qualifying psychiatric disabilities need not be factored into the analysis.

Archive Notice

This archive contains published Missouri Labor and Industrial Relations Commission workers' compensation decisions reproduced for research convenience. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Legal Help

Practical guidance for this decision

Third-Party Injury Check

This workers' comp decision may point to a separate injury claim.

  • A driver, contractor, property owner, or equipment company may share fault.
  • The injury involved a vehicle, unsafe premises, defective equipment, or a non-employer vendor.
  • A serious injury or death may need both benefits review and civil-claim analysis.

Caption

FINAL AWARD ALLOWING COMPENSATION (Affirming Award and Decision of Administrative Law Judge with Supplemental Opinion)
Employee:Donald Brown
Employer:Noranda Aluminum, Inc. (settled)
Insurer:New Hampshire Insurance Co. (settled)
Additional Party:Treasurer of Missouri as Custodian of Second Injury Fund
This workers' compensation case is submitted to the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) for review as provided by § 287.480 RSMo. Having read the briefs, heard oral argument, reviewed the evidence, and considered the whole record, we find that the award of the administrative law judge (ALJ) allowing compensation is supported by competent and substantial evidence and was made in accordance with the Missouri Workers' Compensation Law. Pursuant to § 286.090 RSMo, we affirm the ALJ’s award and decision with this supplemental opinion.We write this supplemental opinion to address the Second Injury Fund’s (Fund) assertion that the ALJ “erred by finding Employee [permanently and totally disabled (PTD)] without his anxiety disability as the evidence clearly showed it contributed to his total disability.” We disagree.In determining that employee is PTD as a result of his primary injury and preexisting qualifying disabilities to the back and left elbow, the ALJ relied on employee’s credible testimony and the credible opinions of Stephen Dolan and Dr. David Volarich. Dr. Volarich noted in his report that psychiatric disability exists; however he deferred “to psychiatry for assessment.” In light of that deferral, we read Dr. Volarich’s opinion that employee is PTD due to his primary injury “in combination with his preexisting medical conditions” as excluding any psychiatric disability. Dr. Volarich stated that his opinion of PTD was “[b]ased on my medical assessment alone.” Additionally, Dr. Volarich provided no rating or permanent restrictions regarding any psychiatric disability, and it need not be considered in our PTD determination. “The existence of non-qualifying disabilities does not count against (or for) the claimant[.]”Klecka v. Treasurer of Mo. as Custodian of the Second Injury Fund, 644 S.W.3d 562, 566 (Mo. banc 2022).As observed by the Court in Moss v. Treasurer of Mo. - Custodian of the Second Injury Fund, 570 S.W.3d 110, 116 (Mo. App. 2018):Consistent with the definition of “total disability,” we interpret § 287.190.6(2)’s mandate that permanent total disability “be demonstrated and certified by a physician” to require that a physician show clearly and attest as being true the

Employee's medical condition and resulting work-related restrictions post injury. Once a physician does that, the requirement of $\S 287.190 .6(2)$ is satisfied, and it is within the Commission's expertise to determine whether the employee, with the medical conditions and physical limitations confirmed by the physician, is employable. See Patterson, 452 S.W.3d at 767 ("[U]ltimately, the employability of an individual is a technical matter within the Commission's expertise.").

The above brief amendment to the ALJ's award does not detract from her legal reasoning or her correct analysis of the evidence in the record.

Conclusion

We affirm and adopt the award of the administrative law judge as supplemented herein.

The award and decision of Administrative Law Judge Amy L. Young, issued May 3, 2022, is attached and incorporated to the extent not inconsistent with this supplemental opinion.

Any past due compensation shall bear interest as provided by law.

Given at Jefferson City, State of Missouri, this $\qquad 3rd \qquad$ day February of 2023.

![img-0.jpeg](img-0.jpeg)

LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION

![img-1.jpeg](img-1.jpeg)

Shalonn K. Curls, Member

DISSENTING OPINION FILED

Kathryn Swan, Member

Attest:

![img-2.jpeg](img-2.jpeg)

DISSENTING OPINION

I have reviewed the evidence, and considered the whole record. Based on my review of the evidence as well as my consideration of the relevant provisions of the Missouri Workers' Compensation Law, I disagree with the majority's decision to affirm the administrative law judge's (ALJ) decision.

The ALJ and Commission majority found that employee is permanently and totally disabled (PTD) from the 2016 primary injury combined with three preexisting disabilities:

- September 13, 2010 injury: 32.5 % of the body as a whole (BAW) referable to the lumbar spine;

- September 13, 2010 injury: 30\% of the left elbow (63 weeks) and a 10\% load factor (19.3 weeks); and

- July 16, 2007 injury: 17.5 % of the left elbow ( 36.75 weeks).

In determining that the Second Injury Fund (Fund) bears liability for PTD, the ALJ and Commission majority stacked two distinct injuries, combining the qualifying left elbow injury in September 13, 2010 with the non-qualifying July 16, 2007 left elbow injury. I find no authority for that approach.

There is no provision in the Workers' Compensation Act that expressly permits stacking to determine Fund liability for PTD. Further, the Supreme Court of Missouri and the lower appellate courts have not ruled on whether cumulative disabilities can be stacked to find the Fund liable under $\S 287.220 .3$ RSMo.

It is clear, however, that the intent of the Missouri Legislature's 2013 amendments to § 287.220.3 RSMo was to limit the Fund's liability. Treasurer of the State as Custodian of the Second Injury Fund v. Parker, 622 S.W.3d 178, 181 (Mo. banc 2021). I conclude that the ALJ's decision as affirmed by the Commission majority in this case incorrectly expands the Fund's Liability and is contrary to the legislature's intent.

For these reasons, I respectfully dissent from the majority's decision in this matter.

FINAL AWARD

Employee: Donald Brown

Injury No. 16-027102

Dependents: N/A

Employer: Noranda Aluminum, Inc. (Settled)

Additional Party: Second Injury Fund

Insurer: New Hampshire Insurance Co. (Settled)

Appearances: Thomas W. Collins, III for Employee

Crystal Williams for the Second Injury Fund

Hearing Date: February 7, 2022

Checked by: ALY/kg

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS

  1. Are any benefits awarded herein? Yes.
  2. Was the injury or occupational disease compensable under Chapter 287? Yes.
  3. Was there an accident or incident of occupational disease under the Law? Yes.
  4. Date of accident or onset of occupational disease? February 9, 2016.
  5. State location where accident occurred or occupational disease contracted: New Madrid County.
  6. Was above employee in employ of above employer at time of alleged accident or occupational disease? Yes.
  7. Did the employer receive proper notice? Yes.
  8. Did accident or occupational disease arise out of and in the course of the employment? Yes.
  9. Was claim for compensation filed within time required by law? Yes.
  10. Was the employer insured by above insurer? Yes.
Employee: Donald BrownInjury No. 16-027102
11.Describe work the employee was doing and how accident happened or occupational disease contracted:Employee strained his low back at work while operating a jackhammer.
12.Did accident or occupational disease cause death? No.
13.Parts of body injured by accident or occupational disease: Low back-body as a whole.
14.Nature and extent of any permanent disability: 12.5% body as a whole.
15.Compensation paid to date for temporary total disability: $7,728.87 for 8 6/7 weeks.
16.Value necessary medical aid paid to date by the employer-insurer: $4,215.75.
17.Value necessary medical aid not furnished by the employer-insurer: N/A.
18.Employee's average weekly wage: $2,123.47.
19.Weekly compensation rate: 886.92 for temporary total and permanent total disability and 464.58 for permanent partial disability.
20.Method wages computation: By stipulation.
21.Amount of compensation payable: See Award.
22.Second Injury Fund liability: See Award.
23.Future requirements awarded: None.
Said payments shall be payable as provided in the findings of fact and rulings of law, and shall be subject to modification and review as provided bylaw.
The Compensation awarded to the employee shall be subject to a lien in the amount of 25% of all payments hereunder in favor of thefollowing attorney for necessary legal services rendered to the employee: Thomas W. Collins, III.

STATEMENT OF THE FINDINGS OF FACT AND RULINGS OF LAW

On February 7, 2022, the employee, Donald Brown, appeared in person and with his attorney, Thomas W. Collins, III, for a hearing for a final award. The Second Injury Fund was represented at the hearing by their attorney, Assistant Attorney General Crystal Williams. For purposes of judicial efficiency and convenience of the parties, the Hearing included evidence for both Injury No. 16-027102 and Injury No. 16-011590. Separate awards are being issued for each case. At the time of the hearing, the parties agreed on certain undisputed facts and identified the issues that were in dispute. These undisputed facts and issues, together with a statement of the findings of fact and rulings of law, are set forth below as follows:

UNDISPUTED FACTS:

  1. Employer was operating under and subject to the provisions of the Missouri Workers' Compensation Act, and its liability was fully insured by New Hampshire Insurance Company.
  2. On or about the date of the alleged accident or occupational disease, the employee was an employee of Noranda Aluminum and was working under the Workers' Compensation Act.
  3. On or about February 9, 2016, the employee sustained an accident or occupational disease arising out of and in the course of his employment.
  4. The employer had notice of the employee's accident.
  5. Employee's claim was filed within the time allowed by law.
  6. The employee's average weekly wage was $\ 2,123.47, resulting in a compensation rate of $\ 886.92 for temporary total disability benefits and $\ 464.58 for permanent partial disability benefits.
  7. Medical aid was furnished by Employer-Insurer in the amount of $\ 4,215.75.
  8. Temporary total disability was paid by Employer-Insurer in the amount of $\ 7,728.87 for 8 $6 / 7$ weeks.
  9. Employee reached maximum medical improvement on August 16, 2016.
  10. The Stipulation for Compromise Settlement in Injury No. 16-011590 should read "BAWHemorrhoid" and the Stipulation for Compromise Settlement in Injury No. 16-027102, marked as Exhibit 6, should read "BAW-Back."

ISSUES:

  1. Liability of the Second Injury fund for permanent total disability.

EXHIBITS:

The following exhibits were offered and admitted into evidence:

Employee Exhibits:

  1. IME performed by David T. Volarich, M.D.
  2. Deposition of J. Stephen Dolan
  3. Vocational and Rehabilitation Assessment of Donald Dwayne Brown performed by J. Stephen Dolan, M.A., C.R.C., L.C.P.C.
  4. Curriculum Vitae of J. Stephen Dolan, M.A., C.R.C.
  5. Stipulation for Compromise Settlement for Injury No. 16-011590
  6. Stipulation for Compromise Settlement for Injury Number 16-027102
  7. Stipulation for Compromise Settlement, Injury No. 10-073845
  8. Stipulation for Compromise Settlement, Injury No. 10-073845 SIF
  9. Medical records of Regional Brain and Spine
  10. Medical records of Orthopedic Sports Medicine \& Spine Care Institute
  11. Functional Capacity Evaluation performed by The Work Center, Inc.
  12. Medical records of James Coyle, M.D., 1 of 3
  13. Medical records of James Coyle, M.D., 2 of 3
  14. Medical records of James Coyle, M.D., 3 of 3
  15. Medical Records of Patrick Knight, M.D.
  16. X-ray films
  17. Medical records of Colleen Hunter-Pearson, M.D. 1 of 4
  18. Medical records of Colleen Hunter-Pearson, M.D. 2 of 4
  19. Medical records of Colleen Hunter-Pearson, M.D. 3 of 4
  20. Medical records of Colleen Hunter-Pearson, M.D. 4 of 4
  21. Medical records of Mercy Hospital, 1 of 11
  22. Medical records of Mercy Hospital, 2 of 11
  23. Medical records of Mercy Hospital, 3 of 11
  24. Medical records of Mercy Hospital, 4 of 11
  25. Medical r

Full decision text continues in the plain-text archive copy.

Related Decisions

affirmed

The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirmed the Administrative Law Judge's award allowing workers' compensation benefits to Theresa Thompson for a low back injury sustained on July 20, 2010 while lifting and shelving copper coils. The claimant was entitled to temporary total disability benefits, permanent partial disability compensation, and medical aid totaling over $223,000, with additional underpayment and back pay amounts owed.

back12,259 words

The Commission modified the ALJ's award to allow compensation for unpaid past medical expenses for employee Rodney Battles, who sustained a work-related back injury on October 5, 2016, requiring two back surgeries. The decision clarifies that an employer's duty to provide statutorily-required medical aid is absolute and unqualified under Missouri workers' compensation law.

back6,444 words

Gourley v. Cox Medical Center(2021)

December 15, 2021#07-031701

affirmed

The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirmed the administrative law judge's award allowing workers' compensation benefits for Carol Gourley's injury sustained on January 13, 2007 at Cox Medical Center. One commissioner dissented, arguing the ALJ erred in denying payment for unpaid medical bills ($173,896.25) and temporary total disability benefits ($109,574.64) related to the compensable 2007 injury.

back12,971 words

Comer v. Central Programs, Inc.(2021)

August 11, 2021#16-085212

affirmed

The Commission affirmed the Administrative Law Judge's award of permanent total disability compensation, finding the employee's November 1, 2016 back injury combined with qualifying preexisting disabilities met statutory requirements for Second Injury Fund liability. The employee's preexisting lower left extremity and thoracic disabilities, each exceeding fifty weeks of permanent partial disability, directly aggravated and accelerated the primary work-related back injury resulting in permanent total disability.

back14,532 words

The Commission affirmed the Administrative Law Judge's award of workers' compensation benefits to Steven Scott Oakley for injuries sustained when a loading dock door fell on him on November 17, 2010. The employee received compensation for temporary total disability, necessary medical care, and permanent partial disability benefits affecting his thoracic spine, low back, and head.

back10,246 words