St. Louis Counsel
Ott Law Firm

Case Authority

state v glass 439 sw3d 838

This authority appears in 8 citation records in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive.

Canonical ID
case:state-v-glass-439-sw3d-838
Citation Sample
State v. Glass, 439 S.W.3d 838
Cases Shown
8
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to cases citing this authority

These links route legal-research traffic from this authority profile into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the authority itself or the cited cases map to a practical client issue.

Criminal LawCivil Litigation

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help with an issue tied to state v glass 439 sw3d 838?

This authority profile is public case-law research. If the authority connects to your claim or dispute, Ott Law Firm can help evaluate evidence, deadlines, and next steps.

Free ConsultationCall Ott Law Firm

Citation Treatment

cited

6

overruled

2

Cases Citing state v glass 439 sw3d 838

Showing up to 50 opinion records linked to this authority.

overruled

Citation: State v. Glass, 439 S.W.3d 838

Amanda Rogers appealed her conviction for unlawful possession of a firearm by a felon, challenging both the sufficiency of evidence and the legality of the vehicle stop that led to the firearm's discovery. The Missouri Supreme Court affirmed the circuit court's judgment, upholding the conviction and rejection of Rogers's motion to suppress.

Criminal LawCivil Litigation
overruled

Citation: State v. Glass, 439 S.W.3d 838

Eggleston appealed his conviction for possession of methamphetamine found in the vehicle he was driving, arguing insufficient evidence of knowing possession. The Missouri Supreme Court affirmed the conviction, finding sufficient evidence supported the guilty verdict based on the methamphetamine discovered in the driver's side dashboard cubby within reach of the driver's seat.

Criminal LawCivil Litigation