St. Louis Counsel
Ott Law Firm

Case Authority

state v nowicki 682 sw3d 410

This authority appears in 11 citation records in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive.

Canonical ID
case:state-v-nowicki-682-sw3d-410
Citation Sample
State v. Nowicki, 682 S.W.3d 410
Cases Shown
11
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to cases citing this authority

These links route legal-research traffic from this authority profile into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the authority itself or the cited cases map to a practical client issue.

Criminal LawCivil LitigationFamily Law

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help with an issue tied to state v nowicki 682 sw3d 410?

This authority profile is public case-law research. If the authority connects to your claim or dispute, Ott Law Firm can help evaluate evidence, deadlines, and next steps.

Free ConsultationCall Ott Law Firm

Citation Treatment

cited

9

distinguished

1

followed

1

Cases Citing state v nowicki 682 sw3d 410

Showing up to 50 opinion records linked to this authority.

followed

Citation: State v. Nowicki, 682 S.W.3d 410

James Willis Peters appealed his conviction for driving while intoxicated as a chronic offender, challenging whether the state proved beyond a reasonable doubt that all four of his prior offenses were intoxication-related traffic offenses. The court found the state failed to sufficiently prove his 2002 offense was an IRTO and therefore vacated the judgment and remanded for resentencing.

Criminal LawCivil Litigation