Carl Ward, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.
Decision date: Unknown
Parties & Roles
- Appellant
- Carl Ward
- Respondent
- State of Missouri
Disposition
Affirmed
Slip Opinion Notice
This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.
Opinion
This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: Carl Ward, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent. Case Number: 73652 Handdown Date: 09/15/1998 Appeal From: Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Hon. Brendan Ryan Counsel for Appellant: Ellen H. Flottman Counsel for Respondent: Breck K. Burgess Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: PER CURIAM Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. Pudlowski, P.J., Crandall, Jr., and Ahrens, J.J., concur. Opinion: ORDER Movant, Carl A. Ward, appeals from the denial, following an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 motion for post- conviction relief. Ward was charged by indictment with first degree robbery, Section 569.020, RSMo 1994. A jury found Ward guilty of robbery and he was sentenced to a term of fifteen years. This court affirmed the conviction. State v. Ward, 943 S.W.2d 792 (Mo. App. 1997). Ward filed an amended Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief that the motion court denied. He appeals from the denial of his 29.15 motion. We affirm. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b). Separate Opinion: None
This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.
Authorities Cited
Statutes, rules, and cases referenced in this opinion.
Statutes
- RSMo § 569.020cited
Section 569.020, RSMo
Rules
- Rule 29.15cited
Rule 29.15
- Rule 84.16cited
Rule 84.16
Cases
- ward guilty of robbery and he was sentenced to a term of fifteen years this court affirmed the conviction state v ward 943 sw2d 792cited
Ward guilty of robbery and he was sentenced to a term of fifteen years. This court affirmed the conviction. State v. Ward, 943 S.W.2d 792
Related Opinions
Cases sharing legal topics and authorities with this opinion.
State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Reginald Clemons, Appellant.(1997)
Supreme Court of Missouri
David Perkins-Bey, Movant/Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.(1998)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Donald Willen, Defendant. Donald Wilen, Movant/Defendant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.(1997)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
State of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Maurice Campbell, Defendant/Appellant. Maurice Campbell, Movant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.(1998)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Lacey Paige, Defendant. Lacey Paige, Movant/Defendant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.(1997)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Willie Portwood, Appellant. Willie Portwood, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.(1997)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District