State of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Maurice Campbell, Defendant/Appellant. Maurice Campbell, Movant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.
Decision date: Unknown
Parties & Roles
- Appellant
- Maurice Campbell, Defendant/·Maurice Campbell, Defendant/Appellant. Maurice Campbell, Movant, v. State of Missouri
- Respondent
- State of Missouri, Plaintiff/
Disposition
Affirmed
Slip Opinion Notice
This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.
Opinion
This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: State of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Maurice Campbell, Defendant/Appellant. Maurice Campbell, Movant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent. Case Number: 66821 & 70614 Handdown Date: 09/22/1998 Appeal From: Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Hon. Charles Kitchin and Hon. John J. Riley Counsel for Appellant: S. Paige Canfield Counsel for Respondent: Meghan J. Stephens Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: PER CURIAM Opinion Vote: Pudlowski, P.J., Crandall and Ahrens, JJ. Opinion: ORDER Maurice Campbell appeals from convictions for four counts of robbery in the first degree in the Circuit Court of St. Louis City. Section 569.020 RSMo 1994. He was sentenced to twenty years imprisonment in the Missouri Department of Corrections for count I, ten years on count III, ten years on count IV and twenty years on count V with all four sentences to run concurrent. This appeal is consolidated with an appeal from the denial of his Rule 29.15 post-conviction motion without an evidentiary hearing. We have read the briefs and reviewed the legal file and transcript. We find no error of law and no jurisprudential purpose will be served by an extended written opinion. Judgment of conviction is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b). The denial of post-conviction relief is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b). Separate Opinion:
None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.
Authorities Cited
Statutes, rules, and cases referenced in this opinion.
Statutes
- RSMo § 569.020cited
Section 569.020 RSMo
Rules
- Rule 29.15cited
Rule 29.15
- Rule 30.25cited
Rule 30.25
- Rule 84.16cited
Rule 84.16
Related Opinions
Cases sharing legal topics and authorities with this opinion.
State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Anthony Eanes, Appellant. Anthony Eanes, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.(1998)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Ronmel Jenkins, Appellant. Ronmel Jenkins, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.(1998)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Willie Portwood, Appellant. Willie Portwood, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.(1997)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Barry Wallace, Appellant. Barry Wallace, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.(1997)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Lacey Paige, Defendant. Lacey Paige, Movant/Defendant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.(1997)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Dennis Williams, Appellant. Dennis Williams, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.(1998)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District