OTT LAW

State of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Maurice Campbell, Defendant/Appellant. Maurice Campbell, Movant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.

Decision date: Unknown

Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: State of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Maurice Campbell, Defendant/Appellant. Maurice Campbell, Movant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent. Case Number: 66821 & 70614 Handdown Date: 09/22/1998 Appeal From: Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Hon. Charles Kitchin and Hon. John J. Riley Counsel for Appellant: S. Paige Canfield Counsel for Respondent: Meghan J. Stephens Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: PER CURIAM Opinion Vote: Pudlowski, P.J., Crandall and Ahrens, JJ. Opinion: ORDER Maurice Campbell appeals from convictions for four counts of robbery in the first degree in the Circuit Court of St. Louis City. Section 569.020 RSMo 1994. He was sentenced to twenty years imprisonment in the Missouri Department of Corrections for count I, ten years on count III, ten years on count IV and twenty years on count V with all four sentences to run concurrent. This appeal is consolidated with an appeal from the denial of his Rule 29.15 post-conviction motion without an evidentiary hearing. We have read the briefs and reviewed the legal file and transcript. We find no error of law and no jurisprudential purpose will be served by an extended written opinion. Judgment of conviction is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b). The denial of post-conviction relief is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b). Separate Opinion:

None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.

Related Opinions