OTT LAW

Daryl Diemer, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.

Decision date: Unknown

Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Western District Case Style: Daryl Diemer, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent. Case Number: No. 53796 Handdown Date: 09/16/1997 Appeal From: Circuit Court of Jackson County, Hon. K. Preston Dean II Counsel for Appellant: Andrew Allen Schroeder Counsel for Respondent: John Munson Morris Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: PER CURIAM Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. Smart, P.J., Lowenstein and Stith, JJ., concur. Opinion: ORDER Appellant pled guilty to one count each of attempted stealing, tampering in the first degree, and stealing property valued over one hundred fifty dollars. He filed this Rule 24.035 motion alleging his plea counsel was ineffective for not informing him he was required to serve eighty percent of his sentence, and that the motion court failed to advise him of the parole implications of the plea. Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b). Separate Opinion: None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.

Related Opinions