OTT LAW

David J. Brinkley, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Cindy J. Brinkley, Respondent-Respondent.

Decision date: Unknown

Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: David J. Brinkley, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Cindy J. Brinkley, Respondent-Respondent. Case Number: Nos. 70555 & 70928 Handdown Date: 06/17/1997 Appeal From: Circuit Court of St. Francois County, Hon. James H. Kelly Counsel for Appellant: Counsel for Respondent: Opinion Summary: Citation: Opinion Author: Per Curiam Opinion Vote: Before Lawrence G. Crahan, P.J. and Stanley A. Grimm, J. and Mary K. Hoff, J. Opinion:

Appellant, David J. Brinkley (Husband), appeals the trial court's judgment and decree of dissolution. Husband's points on appeal allege trial court error in division of marital property, award of maintenance, and attorney fees. We find the trial court did not abuse its discretion. The trial court's judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential or jurisprudential value. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b). Separate Opinion: This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.

Related Opinions