OTT LAW

Employers Insurance of Wausau, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Sharon Ester-Thames, Defendant/Respondent.

Decision date: Unknown

Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: Employers Insurance of Wausau, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Sharon Ester-Thames, Defendant/Respondent. Case Number: 73703 Handdown Date: 09/15/1998 Appeal From: Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Hon. Philip J. Sweeney Counsel for Appellant: Party Acting Pro Se Counsel for Respondent: Ernie Brasier Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: PER CURIAM Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. Hoff, P.J., Gaertner and Rhodes Russell, J.J., concur. Opinion: ORDER Plaintiff appeals the trial court's judgment in favor of defendant in this breach of trust action. We find the judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and does not erroneously declare or apply the law. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976). An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. We affirm pursuant to rule 84.16(b). Separate Opinion: None

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.

Related Opinions