Nathaniel Jefferson, Movant-Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent-Respondent.

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: Nathaniel Jefferson, Movant-Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent-Respondent. Case Number: No. 71986 Handdown Date: 08/26/1997 Appeal From: Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Hon. Philip J. Sweeney Counsel for Appellant: Elaine A. Marten Counsel for Respondent: John M. Morris, III Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: PER CURIAM Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. Dowd, Jr., P.J., Simon and Hoff, JJ., concur. Opinion:

ORDER Nathaniel Jefferson (Movant) appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion following an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b). Separate Opinion: None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.