Ott Law Firm

Robert W. Cockerham, et al., Appellants, vs. American Family Mutual Insurance Company, Respondent, and Nicholas Howard Schalk, Schalk Construction, LLC, Robert Berthold and R.J. Berthold Engineering Co., d/b/a RJ Engineering and d/b/a Berthold Engineering, Co., Defendants.

Decision date: September 25, 2018ED106353

Parties & Roles

Judges

Trial Court Judge
Michael D

Disposition

Undetermined

Procedural posture: Appeal from cross-motions for summary judgment

Slip Opinion Notice

This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Legal Help

Researching a similar insurance bad faith issue?

This archive page is for legal research. For a practical overview of claims, deadlines, evidence, and next steps, start with the related practice page.

Syllabus

ROBERT W. COCKERHAM, et al., ) No. ED106353 ) Appellants, ) Appeal from the Circuit Court of ) St. Louis County vs. ) 15SL-CC02435 ) AMERICAN FAMILY MUTUAL ) INSURANCE COMPANY, ) Honorable Michael D. Burton ) Respondent, ) Filed: September 25, 2018 ) NICHOLAS HOWARD SCHALK, ) SCHALK CONSTRUCTION, LLC, ) ROBERT BERTHOLD, and R.J. ) BERTHOLD ENGINEERING CO., d/b/a ) RJ ENGINEERING and d/b/a ) BERTHOLD ENGINEERING, CO., ) ) Defendants.

OPINION

Homeowners Robert W. Cockerham and Stacia A. Cockerham and their homeowner's insurance provider American Family Mutual Insurance Company filed cross-motions for summary judgment arising out of a dispute regarding coverage under Homeowners' insurance policy for losses that occurred in connection with the construction of an addition to their residence which Homeowners intended to use as a celestial observatory. Specifically, Homeowners sought coverage for the damage that occurred to a newly-installed telescope support system, to the foundation of their home, and for their loss of use of the observatory.

Related Opinions

Cases sharing legal topics and authorities with this opinion.

PAUL METZGER, and JACQUELINE METZGER, Respondents v. WAYNE MORELOCK, and KATHY MORELOCK, Appellants(2026)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern DistrictMarch 12, 2026#SD38930

affirmed

The trial court granted summary judgment to the Metzgers on their claim for a prescriptive easement over a portion of a paved driveway between their home and the Morelocks' property. The appellate court affirmed the grant of summary judgment, finding no genuine issue of material fact and that the moving party was entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Real EstateCivil Litigationper_curiam1,904 words
Read opinion