Samnang Duong, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Western District Case Style: Samnang Duong, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent. Case Number: No. 53296 Handdown Date: 08/19/1997 Appeal From: Circuit Court of Platte County, Hon. Ward B. Stuckey Counsel for Appellant: James C. Cox Counsel for Respondent: Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon and Philip M. Koppe Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: Per Curiam Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. Smart, P.J., Lowenstein and Stith, JJ., concur. Opinion: ORDER Samnang Duong appeals the motion court's denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. Mr. Duong claims that his plea counsel was ineffective in failing to inform him that under Section 558.019 he would be required to serve a minimum of eighty-five percent of his sentence before becoming eligible for parole. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no reversible error. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we affirm by this summary order and have furnished the parties with a memorandum setting forth our reasoning. Rule 84.16(b). Separate Opinion: None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.