OTT LAW

Sharrie L. Popa, Respondent, v. William T. Popa, et al., Appellant.

Decision date: Unknown

Slip Opinion Notice

This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Western District Case Style: Sharrie L. Popa, Respondent, v. William T. Popa, et al., Appellant. Case Number: 54121 Handdown Date: 06/23/1998 Appeal From: Circuit Court of Clay County, Hon. Michael W. Walker Counsel for Appellant: Stephen V. Crain Counsel for Respondent: Alison K. Blessing Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: Albert A. Riederer, Judge Opinion Vote: DISMISSED. Stith, P.J., Hanna and Riederer, J.J., concur. Opinion: William E. Popa and Eleanor Popa, intervenors below and grandparents of the children born of the marriage of William T. Popa and Sharrie L. Popa, appeal from a decision by the Honorable Michael W. Walker, Family Court Commissioner for the Circuit Court of Clay County. They claim that Commissioner Walker was without jurisdiction to try this case because they had timely filed a motion for a change of judge and the timely filing of such a motion deprived Commissioner Walker of jurisdiction to perform any act other than transferring the case to someone else for disposition. The document purporting to be the final judgment was not signed by a circuit judge. Commissioner Walker executed a "Judgment of Dissolution of Marriage," and then an "Amended Judgment of Dissolution of Marriage" and a "Second Amended Judgment of Dissolution of Marriage." No judge took action with respect to these documents. This court lacks jurisdiction to consider an appeal from a decision of a circuit court commissioner which has not been adopted by the circuit court itself. Slay v. Slay, No. 80405, slip op. at 2 (Mo. banc March 24, 1998). See also, Chapman v. Chapman, No. 53813, slip op. at 2 (Mo. App. April 7, 1998); In re Marriage

of Lindsay, 962 S.W.2d 467 (Mo. App. 1998). Since the circuit court failed to issue a judgment in this case and because the order appealed from is of a commissioner who is "not authorized to exercise judicial power by Article V of the Missouri Constitution, we do not have jurisdiction to consider the appeal." Chapman, slip op. at 2. Therefore, this court dismisses this appeal for lack of appellate jurisdiction. Separate Opinion: None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.

Related Opinions

Ronald Wuebbeling, Respondent, vs. Jill Clark, f/k/a Jill Wuebbeling, Appellant.(2016)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern DistrictAugust 9, 2106#ED103501

affirmed
family-lawmajority5,654 words

L.J.F. vs. J.F.G.(2026)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western DistrictMarch 10, 2026#WD87987

affirmed

The court affirmed the circuit court's renewal of a full order of protection against Father, which was made effective for his lifetime. The order prohibits Father from communicating with or coming within 100 feet of Mother, except for communications concerning their shared child, based on findings that Father engaged in stalking, harassment, and coercion that posed a serious danger to Mother's physical or mental health.

family-lawper_curiam4,882 words

In re the Marriage of: Stacey L. Noble vs. Bradford R. Noble(2026)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western DistrictFebruary 24, 2026#WD87485

affirmed

Wife appealed the trial court's dissolution judgment, challenging the court's failure to provide a remedy after independent investigation of facts, the use of normalized income to determine husband's maintenance obligation, and the finding that husband lacked ability to pay maintenance. The appellate court affirmed the trial court's judgment in all respects.

family-lawmajority8,056 words

In re the matter of: A.L.P. and S.H.P., minors; Alicia Smith, Respondent, vs. Lora Martinez, Appellant.(2026)

Supreme Court of MissouriFebruary 24, 2026#SC101121

reversed

The Missouri Supreme Court reversed the circuit court's grant of third-party visitation to Smith under section 452.375.5(5)(a), holding that this statute does not create an independent cause of action for third-party visitation when custody is not at issue. The court determined that Smith lacked standing to seek visitation rights after Martinez was granted full parental rights through adoption.

family-lawper_curiam3,296 words

M.D.M, Appellant, v. A.W.S., Respondent.(2026)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern DistrictFebruary 10, 2026#ED113141

affirmed

The court affirmed the circuit court's child custody and support judgment, rejecting Father's six points of error regarding the Form 14 calculations, denial of Line 11 credit despite equal visitation time, disproportionate attorney's and GAL fees, and exclusion of testimony on equitable abatement. The appellate court found that Father failed to meet the required analytical standards for challenging the judgment and that the circuit court properly exercised its discretion in denying the Line 11 credit and ruling against equitable abatement.

family-lawmajority3,425 words