State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Marvin Huntley, Appellant. Marvin Huntley, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.
Decision date: Unknown
Parties & Roles
- Appellant
- Marvin Huntley·Marvin Huntley, Appellant. Marvin Huntley, Appellant, v. State of Missouri
- Respondent
- State of Missouri
Disposition
Affirmed
Slip Opinion Notice
This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.
Opinion
This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Marvin Huntley, Appellant. Marvin Huntley, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent. Case Number: 65768 and 72067 Handdown Date: 03/03/1998 Appeal From: Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Hon. Evelyn Baker Counsel for Appellant: Robert Steele Counsel for Respondent: John M. Morris, III, and Gregory L. Barnes Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: PER CURIAM Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. Crahan, C.J., Teitelman, J. and Blackmar, Sr.J., concur. Opinion: ORDER Defendant appeals the judgment entered upon his conviction by a jury of murder in the first degree in violation of section 565.020 RSMo. 1994 and armed criminal action in violation of section 571.015 RSMo. 1994. Defendant also appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. A detailed opinion would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this Order. The judgments are affirmed pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b). Separate Opinion: None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.
Authorities Cited
Statutes, rules, and cases referenced in this opinion.
Statutes
- RSMo § 565.020cited
section 565.020 RSMo
- RSMo § 571.015cited
section 571.015 RSMo
Rules
- Rule 29.15cited
Rule 29.15
Related Opinions
Cases sharing legal topics and authorities with this opinion.
State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Chauncey F. Wright, Appellant.(1997)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District
Daniel O. Jones, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.(2006)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District#WD65631
Andre Morrow, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.(2000)
Supreme Court of Missouri#SC82009
State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Marques Morris, Defendant. Maarques Morris, Movant/Defendant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.(1998)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
State of Missouri, Respondent, v. John King, Appellant. John King, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.(1998)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Deandre Roddy, Appellant.(1997)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District#WD53550