State of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Theodis Guyton, Defendant/Appellant. Theodis Guyton, Movant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: State of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Theodis Guyton, Defendant/Appellant. Theodis Guyton, Movant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent. Case Number: 66889 and 71762 Handdown Date: 12/30/1997 Appeal From: Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Hon. Richard J. Mehan and Hon. John J. Riley Counsel for Appellant: Douglas R. Hoff Counsel for Respondent: David R. Truman Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: PER CURIAM Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. Grimm, P.J., and Pudlowski and Gaertner, JJ., concur. Opinion: O R D E R Defendant Theodis Guyton was found guilty after a jury trial of trafficking in the second degree, Section 195.223 RSMo, and possession of a controlled substance, Section 195.202 RSMo. The trial court sentenced defendant to concurrent terms of ten years imprisonment, and six months imprisonment and a $500 fine. From that judgment defendant appealed. Subsequently, he filed his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. The motion was denied without an evidentiary hearing. Defendant also appealed the denial of his motion. Defendant's direct appeal is denied and judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b). We find the motion court's judgment is based on findings that are not clearly erroneous and the evidence in support of the jury verdict is not insufficient. No error of law appears and an opinion would serve no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b). Separate Opinion:

None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.