State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Ronmel Jenkins, Appellant. Ronmel Jenkins, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Ronmel Jenkins, Appellant. Ronmel Jenkins, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent. Case Number: 69918 and 72545 Handdown Date: 03/31/1998 Appeal From: Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Hon. Joan M. Burger Counsel for Appellant: Douglas R. Hoff Counsel for Respondent: Gregory L. Barnes Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: PER CURIAM Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. Crahan, C.J., Teitelman, J., and Crist, Sr. J., concur. Opinion: ORDER Opinion modified by Court's own motion on May 12, 1998. This substitution does not constitute a new opinion. Ronmel Jenkins (Defendant) appeals the judgment entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of first degree robbery in violation of Section 569.020 RSMo 1994. The trial court sentenced Defendant as a prior and persistent offender to a term of twenty-five years imprisonment. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file and the record on direct appeal and find Defendant's sole point on appeal to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. The trial court's judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b). In this consolidated matter Defendant also appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for postconviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file and the record on appeal

and find Defendant's claims to be without merit. The motion court's judgment is based on findings of fact and conclusions of law that are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The motion court's judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). We have furnished the parties with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. Separate Opinion: None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.