State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Aisia Johnson, Appellant. Aisia Johnson, Movant-Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Aisia Johnson, Appellant. Aisia Johnson, Movant-Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent. Case Number: 66451 and 72574 Handdown Date: 08/25/1998 Appeal From: Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Hon. Evelyn M. Baker Counsel for Appellant: Dorothy M. Hirzy Counsel for Respondent: Gregory L. Barnes Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: PER CURIAM Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. Pudlowski, P. J., Crandall, Jr., and Ahrens, J.J., concur. Opinion: O R D E R Defendant Aisia Johnson appeals from his judgments of conviction, after a jury trial, of three counts of burglary in the second degree, one count of stealing $150 or more, and one count of escape from confinement. Defendant was sentenced as a class X offender to concurrent terms of imprisonment of twenty years for each of the three counts of burglary in the second degree, as well as for the felony stealing count, and to a concurrent term of imprisonment of ten years for the escape from custody charge, for a total term of imprisonment of twenty years. Defendant also appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentiary hearing. With regard to defendant's direct appeal, no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The judgments of conviction are affirmed. Rule 30.25 (b). The denial of defendant's Rule 29.15 motion is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous; no error of

law appears. A written opinion would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16 (b). Separate Opinion: None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.