State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Barry Wallace, Appellant. Barry Wallace, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Barry Wallace, Appellant. Barry Wallace, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent. Case Number: Nos. 68740 & 70799 Handdown Date: 09/30/1997 Appeal From: Circuit Court of St. Charles County, Hon. Lucy D. Rauch Counsel for Appellant: Michael A. Gross Counsel for Respondent: John M. Morris, III Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: PER CURIAM Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. Knaup Crane, P.J., Rhodes Russell and R. Dowd, JJ., concur. Opinion: ORDER Defendant, Barry Wallace, appeals from the judgment entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of three counts of first degree robbery, in violation of Section 569.020, RSMo 1994, and three counts of armed criminal action, in violation of Section 571.015, on which he was sentenced to three terms of life imprisonment and three terms of 100 years, to be served consecutively. Defendant also appeals from a judgment denying, after an evidentiary hearing, his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. As to the direct appeal, no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b). As to the post-conviction appeal, the judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact and conclusions of law that are not clearly erroneous. A written opinion would have no precedential value. We affirm the judgment pursuant

ot Rule 84.16(b). However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. Separate Opinion: None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.