State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Antonio Beaver, Appellant.

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Antonio Beaver, Appellant. Case Number: 72675 Handdown Date: 03/10/1998 Appeal From: Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Hon. John J. Riley Counsel for Appellant: Gwenda R. Robinson Counsel for Respondent: Angel M. Woodruff Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: PER CURIAM Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. Ahrens, P.J., Crandall, Jr., and Karohl, J.J., concur. Opinion: Defendant appeals after sentence on charge of robbery first degree, section 569.020 RSMo 1994. The trial court did not err in overruling motions to suppress identification testimony and did not err, plain or otherwise, in permitting a police office to testify regarding any differences in a physical description of the robber and of defendant. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The sentence as a prior offender to run concurrent with an existing sentence is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b). Separate Opinion: None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.