State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Darrin M. Sutton, Appellant. Darrin M. Sutton, Movant/Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.
Decision date: Unknown
Parties & Roles
- Appellant
- Darrin M. Sutton·Darrin M. Sutton, Appellant. Darrin M. Sutton, Movant/Appellant, v. State of Missouri
- Respondent
- State of Missouri
Disposition
Affirmed
Slip Opinion Notice
This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.
Opinion
This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Darrin M. Sutton, Appellant. Darrin M. Sutton, Movant/Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent. Case Number: 68602 and 71805 Handdown Date: 11/25/1997 Appeal From: Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Hon. James R. Hartenbach Counsel for Appellant: Emmett D. Queener Counsel for Respondent: Meghan J. Stephens Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: PER CURIAM Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. Ahrens, P.J., Crandall, Jr. & Karohl, J.J., concur. Opinion: O R D E R Defendant appeals after sentencing on charges of burglary second degree, Section 569.170 RSMo 1994, and stealing under $150, Section 570.030 RSMo 1994. He also appeals denial of Rule 29.15 relief after an evidentiary hearing. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for the order affirming the judgment. Judgment affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b) and 84.16(b). Separate Opinion: None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.
Authorities Cited
Statutes, rules, and cases referenced in this opinion.
Statutes
- RSMo § 569.170cited
Section 569.170 RSMo
- RSMo § 570.030cited
Section 570.030 RSMo
Rules
- Rule 29.15cited
Rule 29.15
- Rule 30.25cited
Rule 30.25
Related Opinions
Cases sharing legal topics and authorities with this opinion.
David A. McNeal, Appellant, vs. State of Missouri, Respondent.(2016)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern DistrictFebruary 16, 2016#ED102152
DANIEL LEE PHERIGO, Movant-Respondent, vs. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-Appellant.(2015)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern DistrictNovember 24, 2015#SD33559
BENJAMIN LEWIS HARPER, Movant-Appellant, vs. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-Respondent.(2013)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern DistrictFebruary 14, 2013#SD32000
State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Thomas Mark Zinna, Defendant/Appellant. Thomas Mark Zinna, Defendant/Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.(1997)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Ronald Lawrence, Appellant. Ronald Lawrence, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.(1997)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Timmy Joe Hudlow, Appellant.(1997)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District