OTT LAW

State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Darrin M. Sutton, Appellant. Darrin M. Sutton, Movant/Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.

Decision date: Unknown

Parties & Roles

Appellant
Darrin M. Sutton·Darrin M. Sutton, Appellant. Darrin M. Sutton, Movant/Appellant, v. State of Missouri
Respondent
State of Missouri

Disposition

Affirmed

Slip Opinion Notice

This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Darrin M. Sutton, Appellant. Darrin M. Sutton, Movant/Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent. Case Number: 68602 and 71805 Handdown Date: 11/25/1997 Appeal From: Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Hon. James R. Hartenbach Counsel for Appellant: Emmett D. Queener Counsel for Respondent: Meghan J. Stephens Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: PER CURIAM Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. Ahrens, P.J., Crandall, Jr. & Karohl, J.J., concur. Opinion: O R D E R Defendant appeals after sentencing on charges of burglary second degree, Section 569.170 RSMo 1994, and stealing under $150, Section 570.030 RSMo 1994. He also appeals denial of Rule 29.15 relief after an evidentiary hearing. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for the order affirming the judgment. Judgment affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b) and 84.16(b). Separate Opinion: None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.

Authorities Cited

Statutes, rules, and cases referenced in this opinion.

Statutes

Rules

Related Opinions

Cases sharing legal topics and authorities with this opinion.