OTT LAW

State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Darryl Taylor, Appellant.

Decision date: Unknown

Parties & Roles

Appellant
Darryl Taylor
Respondent
State of Missouri

Judges

Opinion Author
Sr.

Disposition

Affirmed

Slip Opinion Notice

This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Darryl Taylor, Appellant. Case Number: No. 70948 Handdown Date: 06/24/1997 Appeal From: Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Hon. David C. Mason Counsel for Appellant: Counsel for Respondent: Opinion Summary: Citation: Opinion Author: Per Curiam Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. Before Clifford H. Ahrens, C. J., William H. Crandall, Jr., J., and Charles B. Blackmar, Sr. J. Opinion:

ORDER Defendant, Darryl Taylor, appeals from the judgment on his convictions for forcible rape, section 566.030, RSMo 1994, and forcible sodomy, section 566.060, RSMo 1994. He was sentenced to concurrent sentences of 30 years for each count. We affirm. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Separate Opinion: This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.

Authorities Cited

Statutes, rules, and cases referenced in this opinion.

Statutes

Rules

Related Opinions

Cases sharing legal topics and authorities with this opinion.