OTT LAW

State of Missouri, Respondent, v. David Gruber, Defendant/Appellant.

Decision date: Unknown

Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: State of Missouri, Respondent, v. David Gruber, Defendant/Appellant. Case Number: 72174 Handdown Date: 03/17/1998 Appeal From: Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Hon. Mark D. Seigel Counsel for Appellant: Timothy E. Hogan Counsel for Respondent: John M. Morris, III, and Daniel G. Cierpiot Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: PER CURIAM Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. Crane, P.J., Rhodes Russell and J. Dowd, J.J., concur. Opinion: ORDER Defendant appeals from the judgment entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of two counts of forgery, in violation of section 570.090 RSMo 1994. The jury imposed three months imprisonment, with the sentence suspended, and two fines totaling $1300. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b). Separate Opinion: None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.

Related Opinions