State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Demarko Bolden, Defendant/Appellant.
Decision date: Unknown
Parties & Roles
- Appellant
- Demarko Bolden, Defendant/
- Respondent
- State of Missouri
Disposition
Affirmed
Slip Opinion Notice
This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.
Opinion
This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Demarko Bolden, Defendant/Appellant. Case Number: 72011 Handdown Date: 01/20/1998 Appeal From: Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Hon. Brendan Ryan Counsel for Appellant: Deborah B. Wafer and Susan McGraugh Counsel for Respondent: Seth A. Albin and Cheryl A. Caponegro Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: PER CURIAM Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. Knaup Crane, P.J., Rhodes Russell and J. Dowd, J.J., concur. Opinion: ORDER Defendant appeals from the judgment entered on jury verdicts finding him guilty of two counts of first degree robbery, in violation of section 569.020 RSMo 1994, of two counts of armed criminal action, in violation of section 571.015 RSMo 1994, and of one count of first degree assault, in violation of section 565.050 RSMo 1994, on which he was sentenced to a total of twenty-nine years imprisonment. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b). Separate Opinion: None
This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.
Authorities Cited
Statutes, rules, and cases referenced in this opinion.
Statutes
- RSMo § 565.050cited
section 565.050 RSMo
- RSMo § 569.020cited
section 569.020 RSMo
- RSMo § 571.015cited
section 571.015 RSMo
Rules
- Rule 30.25cited
Rule 30.25
Related Opinions
Cases sharing legal topics and authorities with this opinion.
State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Arlandus Keyes, Defendant/Appellant. and Arlandus Keyes, Defendant/Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.(1998)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
State of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Kevin Lucious, Defendant/Appellant.(1998)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
State of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent v. Ralph Harper, Defendant/Appellant and Ralph Harper, Movant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.(1998)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
State of Missouri, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Roger Addison, Defendant-Appellant.(1997)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Erik Weekly, Appellant.(1998)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District
State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Arthur Jackson, Appellant.(1997)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District