State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Gary Fellows, Appellant. Gary Fellows, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.
Decision date: Unknown
Parties & Roles
- Appellant
- Gary Fellows·Gary Fellows, Appellant. Gary Fellows, Appellant, v. State of Missouri
- Respondent
- State of Missouri
Disposition
Undetermined
Slip Opinion Notice
This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.
Opinion
This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Gary Fellows, Appellant. Gary Fellows, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent. Case Number: Consolidated No. 66774 Handdown Date: 07/08/1997 Appeal From: Circuit Court of St. Charles County, Hon. Lucy Rauch Counsel for Appellant: Counsel for Respondent: Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: Per Curiam Opinion Vote: Before Dowd, Jr., P.J., Reinhard, and Gaertner, JJ. Opinion:
ORDER Appellant, Gary Fellows, appeals the judgment of conviction entered by the Circuit Court of St. Charles County after a jury found him guilty of first degree robbery, RSMo section 569.020 (1994), and armed criminal action, RSMo section 571.015 (1994).(FN1) We affirm. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence, and does not erroneously declare or apply the law. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b). Footnotes:
- As appellant's brief raises no issues regarding the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion, his appeal for that judgment
is deemed abandoned. State v. Nelson, 818 S.W.2d 285, 287 (Mo.App.E.D. 1991).
Separate Opinion: None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.
Authorities Cited
Statutes, rules, and cases referenced in this opinion.
Rules
- Rule 29.15cited
Rule 29.15
- Rule 30.25cited
Rule 30.25
Cases
- state v nelson 818 sw2d 285cited
State v. Nelson, 818 S.W.2d 285
Related Opinions
Cases sharing legal topics and authorities with this opinion.
State of Missouri, Respondent, v. David Thomas, Jr., Appellant. David Thomas, Jr., Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.(1997)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Gordon Rocholl, Appellant. Gordon Rocholl, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.(1997)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Derrick Banks, Appellant.(1997)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
State of Missouri, Respondent, vs. Ervin Costello, Appellant; Ervin Costello, Movant-Appellant, vs. State of Missouri, Respondent.(1997)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District