OTT LAW

State of Missouri, Respondent, v. James T. Miller, Appellant. James T. Miller, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.

Decision date: Unknown

Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: State of Missouri, Respondent, v. James T. Miller, Appellant. James T. Miller, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent. Case Number: Consolidated No. 69249 Handdown Date: 06/27/1997 Appeal From: Circuit Court of Audrain County, Hon. Roy Richter Counsel for Appellant: Counsel for Respondent: Opinion Summary: Citation: Opinion Author: Per Curiam Opinion Vote: Before Dowd, Jr., P.J., Gaertner, and Russell, JJ. Opinion:

O R D E R Appellant, James T. Miller, appeals the judgment of conviction entered by the Circuit Court of Audrain County after the trial court found him guilty of trafficking in the second degree, RSMo section 195.223.3(2)(1994). Appellant also appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal files and find the judgment of conviction is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence, and does not erroneously declare or apply the law. We also find the findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgments pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b). Separate Opinion:

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.

Related Opinions