State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Louis Williams, Appellant.

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Louis Williams, Appellant. Case Number: 71166 Handdown Date: 10/14/1997 Appeal From: Circuit Court of St. Louis City, Hon. Timothy Wilson Counsel for Appellant: Douglas R. Hoff Counsel for Respondent: John Munson Morris, III, and Jerry R. Wilding Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: PER CURIAM Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. Knaup Crane, P.J.,Rhodes Russell and James Dowd, JJ., concur. Opinion: ORDER Louis Williams, Defendant, appeals from his jury conviction for first degree robbery. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court did not plainly err in allowing certain arguments by the prosecuting attorney. Rule 29.12(b). An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. Rule 30.25(b). We have, however, prepared a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b). Separate Opinion: None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.