OTT LAW

State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Reginald Holt, Appellant.

Decision date: Unknown

Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Reginald Holt, Appellant. Case Number: 72348 Handdown Date: 03/24/1998 Appeal From: Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Hon. James R. Hartenbach Counsel for Appellant: Edward Bruce Nangle and Kent Denzel Counsel for Respondent: John M. Morris, III Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: PER CURIAM Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. Crahan , C.J., Teitelman, J., and Crist, Sr.J., concur. Opinion: ORDER Reginald Holt, Defendant, appeals the judgment entered upon the jury verdict convicting him of one count of statutory rape in the first degree in violation of 566.032, RSMo 1994, and one count of statutory sodomy in the first degree in violation of 566.062, RSMo 1994. The trial court sentenced him to concurrent sentences of thirty years imprisonment on the statutory rape charge and thirty years imprisonment on the statutory sodomy charge. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. A written opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose and we affirm by summary order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b). We have, however, prepared a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment. Separate Opinion: None

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.

Related Opinions