OTT LAW

State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Thomas B. Wolfin, Jr., Appellant. Thomas B. Wolfin, Jr., Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.

Decision date: Unknown

Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Thomas B. Wolfin, Jr., Appellant. Thomas B. Wolfin, Jr., Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent. Case Number: Nos. 68534 and 70940 Handdown Date: 08/26/1997 Appeal From: Circuit Court of Ste. Genevieve County, Hon. Stan J. Murphy Counsel for Appellant: Kent Denzel Counsel for Respondent: Jeremiah W. Nixon and Fernando Bermudez Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: PER CURIAM Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. Ahrens, P.J., Crandall and Karohl, JJ., concur. Opinion:

ORDER Thomas G. Wolfin, Jr., appeals from a judgment of the circuit court finding him guilty of concealing a prohibited article in a county jail, Sec. 221.111, RSMo 1994. He also appeals from a judgment denying him postconviction relief under Rule 29.15 following an evidentiary hearing. Wolfin argues that the court erred by (1) admitting certain evidence, (2) denying him effective assistance of counsel, (3) not granting a requested continuance, (4) improperly striking a venireperson for cause, (5) sentencing him to cruel and unusual punishment, and (6) assessing costs against him in his 29.15 action. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. The judgments of the trial court are affirmed in accordance with Rules 84.16(b) and 30.25(b).

Separate Opinion: None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.

Related Opinions