State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Timothy Barr, Appellant.
Decision date: Unknown
Parties & Roles
- Appellant
- Timothy Barr
- Respondent
- State of Missouri
Disposition
Affirmed
Slip Opinion Notice
This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.
Opinion
This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Timothy Barr, Appellant. Case Number: 72610 Handdown Date: 06/30/1998 Appeal From: Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Hon. James R. Dowd Counsel for Appellant: Raymund J. Capelovitch Counsel for Respondent: John M. Morris Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: PER CURIAM Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. Crahan, C.J., Simon and Hoff, J.J., concur. Opinion: ORDER Defendant Timothy Barr appeals from the judgment entered after a jury convicted him of first degree murder in violation of section 565.020, RSMo 1994, three counts of first degree assault in violation of section 565.050, RSMo 1994, and four counts of armed criminal action in violation of section 571.015, RSMo 1994. In his appeal, Defendant contends the trial court erred in allowing evidence concerning a prior uncharged crime. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b). Separate Opinion: None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.
Authorities Cited
Statutes, rules, and cases referenced in this opinion.
Statutes
- RSMo § 565.020cited
section 565.020, RSMo
- RSMo § 565.050cited
section 565.050, RSMo
- RSMo § 571.015cited
section 571.015, RSMo
Rules
- Rule 30.25cited
Rule 30.25
Related Opinions
Cases sharing legal topics and authorities with this opinion.
State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Tremonti Perry, Appellant.(2004)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District#ED82218
State of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Kevin Lucious, Defendant/Appellant.(1998)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Arlandus Keyes, Defendant/Appellant. and Arlandus Keyes, Defendant/Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.(1998)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
State of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Unzell Wade, Defendant/Appellant.(1998)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Erik Weekly, Appellant.(1998)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District
State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Marques Morris, Defendant. Maarques Morris, Movant/Defendant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.(1998)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District