OTT LAW

State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Timothy Barr, Appellant.

Decision date: Unknown

Parties & Roles

Appellant
Timothy Barr
Respondent
State of Missouri

Disposition

Affirmed

Slip Opinion Notice

This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Timothy Barr, Appellant. Case Number: 72610 Handdown Date: 06/30/1998 Appeal From: Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Hon. James R. Dowd Counsel for Appellant: Raymund J. Capelovitch Counsel for Respondent: John M. Morris Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: PER CURIAM Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. Crahan, C.J., Simon and Hoff, J.J., concur. Opinion: ORDER Defendant Timothy Barr appeals from the judgment entered after a jury convicted him of first degree murder in violation of section 565.020, RSMo 1994, three counts of first degree assault in violation of section 565.050, RSMo 1994, and four counts of armed criminal action in violation of section 571.015, RSMo 1994. In his appeal, Defendant contends the trial court erred in allowing evidence concerning a prior uncharged crime. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b). Separate Opinion: None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.

Authorities Cited

Statutes, rules, and cases referenced in this opinion.

Statutes

Rules

Related Opinions

Cases sharing legal topics and authorities with this opinion.