OTT LAW

William Bilgere, Appellant v. Madlyn C. Bilgere, Respondent

Decision date: UnknownED82704

Slip Opinion Notice

This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: William Bilgere, Appellant v. Madlyn C. Bilgere, Respondent Case Number: ED82704 Handdown Date: 02/24/2004 Appeal From: Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Hon. Carolyn C. Whittington, Judge Counsel for Appellant: C. Clifford Schwartz Counsel for Respondent: Robert Brummond and William Foote Opinion Summary: The personal representative of the estate of William T. Bilgere appeals the judgment abating the dissolution action that was pending when Mr. Bilgere died. DISMISSED. Division Four Holds: If either spouse dies prior to entry of a final judgment, the dissolution proceedings are abated, the trial court loses jurisdiction, and this court is without jurisdiction to entertain the appeal. Citation: Opinion Author: Lawrence G. Crahan, Judge Opinion Vote: DISMISSED. Shaw, P.J. and Cohen, J., concur Opinion: The personal representative of the estate of William T. Bilgere appeals the judgment abating the dissolution action that was pending when Mr. Bilgere died. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Mr. Bilgere filed a petition for dissolution in early 2002. Prior to entry of judgment in the dissolution action, Mr. Bilgere died. Mrs. Bilgere filed a motion to abate the dissolution proceeding and the motion was granted. The personal

representative of Mr. Bilgere's estate filed a motion to have a judgment entered in the dissolution action and a motion to file lis pendens. Both motions were denied. Although she neither sought nor was granted leave to intervene or to be substituted in the trial court, the personal representative appealed to this court and filed a motion to be substituted as a party appellant. It is by now well settled that if either spouse dies prior to the entry of a final judgment, the dissolution proceedings are abated and the court loses jurisdiction. Winters v. Cooper , 827 S.W.2d 233, 234 (Mo. App. 1991); Parkhurst v. Parkhurst , 799 S.W.2d 159, 161 (Mo. App. 1990). In Parkhurst , as here, the husband died prior to entry of judgment and the case was dismissed. Id. We held that the heirs had no right to appeal and that we had no jurisdiction to entertain the appeal. Id. The same rule applies here. The appeal is dismissed. The personal representative's motion to be substituted as a party appellant is denied.

Separate Opinion: None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.

Related Opinions

Ronald Wuebbeling, Respondent, vs. Jill Clark, f/k/a Jill Wuebbeling, Appellant.(2016)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern DistrictAugust 9, 2106#ED103501

affirmed
family-lawmajority5,654 words

L.J.F. vs. J.F.G.(2026)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western DistrictMarch 10, 2026#WD87987

affirmed

The court affirmed the circuit court's renewal of a full order of protection against Father, which was made effective for his lifetime. The order prohibits Father from communicating with or coming within 100 feet of Mother, except for communications concerning their shared child, based on findings that Father engaged in stalking, harassment, and coercion that posed a serious danger to Mother's physical or mental health.

family-lawper_curiam4,882 words

In re the Marriage of: Stacey L. Noble vs. Bradford R. Noble(2026)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western DistrictFebruary 24, 2026#WD87485

affirmed

Wife appealed the trial court's dissolution judgment, challenging the court's failure to provide a remedy after independent investigation of facts, the use of normalized income to determine husband's maintenance obligation, and the finding that husband lacked ability to pay maintenance. The appellate court affirmed the trial court's judgment in all respects.

family-lawmajority8,056 words

In re the matter of: A.L.P. and S.H.P., minors; Alicia Smith, Respondent, vs. Lora Martinez, Appellant.(2026)

Supreme Court of MissouriFebruary 24, 2026#SC101121

reversed

The Missouri Supreme Court reversed the circuit court's grant of third-party visitation to Smith under section 452.375.5(5)(a), holding that this statute does not create an independent cause of action for third-party visitation when custody is not at issue. The court determined that Smith lacked standing to seek visitation rights after Martinez was granted full parental rights through adoption.

family-lawper_curiam3,296 words

M.D.M, Appellant, v. A.W.S., Respondent.(2026)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern DistrictFebruary 10, 2026#ED113141

affirmed

The court affirmed the circuit court's child custody and support judgment, rejecting Father's six points of error regarding the Form 14 calculations, denial of Line 11 credit despite equal visitation time, disproportionate attorney's and GAL fees, and exclusion of testimony on equitable abatement. The appellate court found that Father failed to meet the required analytical standards for challenging the judgment and that the circuit court properly exercised its discretion in denying the Line 11 credit and ruling against equitable abatement.

family-lawmajority3,425 words