OTT LAW

William E. Long, Jr., Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.

Decision date: Unknown

Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Western District Case Style: William E. Long, Jr., Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent. Case Number: No. 52701 Handdown Date: 07/15/1997 Appeal From: Circuit Court of Andrew County, Hon. Weldon C. Judah Counsel for Appellant: A. Renae Adamson Counsel for Respondent: Cheryl A. Caponegro, Assistant Attorney General Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: Per Curiam Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. Stith, P.J., Breckenridge and Hanna, JJ., concur. Opinion: ORDER Appellant William Long appeals the trial court's denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. Mr. Long claims that the trial court erred in admitting an audio recording of discussions between himself and his trial counsel, Mark Wissehr, because those conversations were protected by the attorney-client privilege. Because we find no violation on the facts of this case, we affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we affirm by this summary order but have provided the parties with a memorandum setting out the reasons for our decision. Rule 84.16(b). Separate Opinion: None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.

Related Opinions