Skip to content
Ott Law Firm

James Hawley v. 360 Fiber Incorporated

Decision date: September 27, 20059 pages

Summary

The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirmed the Administrative Law Judge's decision denying workers' compensation benefits to James G. Hawley for an alleged back injury from lifting a generator on February 1, 2002. The court found that the employee was not in the employ of the employer at the time of the alleged accident and that the injury did not arise out of and in the course of employment.

Archive Notice

This archive contains published Missouri Labor and Industrial Relations Commission workers' compensation decisions reproduced for research convenience. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Legal Help

Practical guidance for this decision

Third-Party Injury Check

This workers' comp decision may point to a separate injury claim.

  • A driver, contractor, property owner, or equipment company may share fault.
  • The injury involved a vehicle, unsafe premises, defective equipment, or a non-employer vendor.
  • A serious injury or death may need both benefits review and civil-claim analysis.

Caption

FINAL AWARD DENYING COMPENSATION

(Affirming Award and Decision of Administrative Law Judge)

Injury No.: 02-012890

Employee: James G. Hawley

Employer: $\quad 360$ Fiber Incorporated

Insurer: Commerce and Industry Insurance Company

Date of Accident: February 1, 2002

Place and County of Accident: Alleged to have occurred in

Reynolds County, Missouri

The above-entitled workers' compensation case is submitted to the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission for review as provided by section 287.480 RSMo. Having reviewed the evidence and considered the whole record, the Commission finds that the award of the associate administrative law judge is supported by competent and substantial evidence and was made in accordance with the Missouri Workers' Compensation Act. Pursuant to section 286.090 RSMo, the Commission affirms the award and decision of the associate administrative law judge dated January 3, 2005, and awards no compensation in the above-captioned case.

The award and decision of Associate Administrative Law Judge Gary L. Robbins, issued January 3, 2005, is attached and incorporated by this reference.

Given at Jefferson City, State of Missouri, this $\underline{27^{\text {th }}}$ day of September 2005.

LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION

William F. Ringer, Chairman

Alice A. Bartlett, Member

Attest:

John J. Hickey, Member

Secretary

ISSUED BY DIVISION OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION

AWARD

Employee: James G. Hawley

Injury No. 02-012890

Dependents: N/A
Employer: 360 Fiber Incorporated
Additional Party: N/A
Insurer: Commerce and Industry Insurance Company
Hearing Date: September 29, 2004Checked by: GR:sm
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
1. Are any benefits awarded herein? No
2. Was the injury or occupational disease compensable under Chapter 287? No
3. Was there an accident or incident of occupational disease under the Law? No
4. Date of accident or onset of occupational disease? Alleged to have occurred on February 1, 2002
5. State location where accident occurred or occupational disease contracted: Alleged to have occurred in Reynolds County, Missouri
6. Was above employee in employ of above employer at time of alleged accident or occupational disease? No
7. Did employer receive proper notice? Yes
8. Did accident or occupational disease arise out of and in the course of the employment? No
9. Was claim for compensation filed within time required by Law? Yes
10. Was employer insured by above insurer? Yes
11. Describe work employee was doing and how accident happened or occupational disease contracted: Employee alleged he injured his back while lifting a generator.
12. Did accident or occupational disease cause death? No
13. Parts of body injured by accident or occupational disease: Employee alleged he injured his back/BAW.
14. Nature and extent of any permanent disability: None
15. Compensation paid-to date for temporary total disability: None
16. Value necessary medical aid paid to date by employer-insurer? None
17. Value necessary medical aid not furnished by employer-insurer? None
18. Employee's average weekly wage: $913.29
19. Weekly compensation rate: $608.86
20. Method wages computation: By agreement
21. Amount of compensation payable: None
FINDINGS OF FACT AND RULINGS OF LAW
On September 29, 2004, James G. Hawley, the employee appeared in person and by his attorney Robert. M. Miller, for a temporary or partial award. The employer-insurer was represented at the hearing by their attorney Dale E. Gerecke. The Court prepared a final award as the Court ruled that that there was no accident and that the employee is not entitled to any benefits. The Court took judicial notice of all of the records contained within the files of the Division of Workers’

Compensation.

At the time of the hearing, the parties agreed on certain undisputed facts and identified the issues that were in dispute. These undisputed facts and issues, together with a summary of the evidence and the findings of fact and rulings of law, are set forth below as follows:

UNDISPUTED FACTS:

  1. The employer was operating under and subject to the provisions of the Missouri Workers' Compensation Act, and liability was fully insured by Commerce and Industry Insurance Company.
  2. The employer had notice of the employee's accident.
  3. The employee's claim was filed within the time allowed by law.
  4. The employee's average weekly wage was $\ 913.29 per week. The employee's rate for temporary total disability and permanent partial disability is $\ 608.86 per week.
  5. No medical aid was furnished by the employer-insurer.
  6. No temporary total disability benefits were paid by the employer-insurer.

ISSUES:

1.Whether on or about the date of the alleged accident or occupational disease, the employee was an employee of 360 Fiber Incorporated and was working under the Workers' Compensation Act.

  1. Whether on or about February 1, 2002, the employee sustained an accident or occupational disease arising out of and in the course of his employment.
  2. Whether the employee's injury was medically causally related to his accident or occupational disease.
  3. Whether the employee needs additional or future medical care.
  4. Whether the employee is entitled to temporary total disability benefits for the period of February 1, 2002 to present, for a total of $\ 84,457.58.

EXHIBITS:

The following exhibits were offered and admitted into evidence:

Employee Exhibits

A. Medical records of Henry F. Steele, M.D.

B. Medical records of St. Louis Orthopedic Institute

C. Deposition of David B. Robson, M.D.

Employer-insurer Exhibits

  1. Deposition of August Ritter III, M.D.

SUMMARY OF THE EVIDENCE:

The evidence presented at trial by the employee consisted of the live testimony of James G. Hawley, the employee; medical records from Dr. Henry Steele; medical records from St. Louis Orthopedic Institute; and the deposition of Dr. David B. Robson. The employer-insurer presented the live testimony of Terry Webster who was the immediate supervisor Mr. Hawley, the live testimony of Mr. Webster's supervisor, Allen Hemrich, and the deposition of Dr. August Ritter III.

James G. Hawley began his employment with 360 Fiber, Incorporated (360) in 1999. 360 was involved in the business of installing fiber optic cables all over the country. The employee performed his initial duties as a fiber optics splicer with a splicing crew, however his job duties also turned to general construction when 360 began having financial difficulties. Terry Webster was the supervisor of the crew that Mr. Hawley was assigned to. It was agreed that the employee kept 360's truck, trailer and other equipment and tools at Mr. Hawley's residence in Reynolds County, Missouri. Part of the equipment that 360 had on their splice trucks was a generator. This arrangement was made, as it was more convenient for the splicing crews to have the equipment based locally then to have it based at a central pickup point.

Mr. Hawley had not actually performed any services for 360 since December 14, 2001. That was the last time the he performed any duties with his splicing crew. At that time he was paid a check that included payment for hours worked, safety hours and a bonus. Due to the bankruptcy proceeding that 360 was going through, all splicing crews were being laid off. It was well known within the company that it was in financial trouble and was laying off all splicing crews. No splicing crews performed any duties for 360 in 2002. Mr. Hawley did not perform any duties for 360 in 2002.

Mr. Hawley testified that he injured his back on February 1, 2002, as he was loading a generator into the back of a truck that belonged to 360 . Through a series of telephone calls over several days, Allen Hemrich had made arrangements to pick up 360 property and had driven to the employee's property on that day to pick up the 360 property the employee kept at his

The employee had back problems that are documented and treated as early as 1984. Records show that he received treatment for his back in January 2001, and had an accident where he was thrown off a horse in December 2001. The medical records document that prior to the events of February 1, 2002, the employee had undergone at least one MRI evaluation that showed numerous back problems at multiple levels to include a herniated disc at L5-S1.

The employee provided testimony recounting his version of the alleged accident of February 1, 2002 and the events leading up to the accident. He testified that he was an employee of 360 on an on-call status that did not change prior to February 1, 2002.

Mr. Hawley testified that he had a lack of trust with 360. He testified this lack of trust existed as a result of financial promises that he said 360 made and did not keep. In January 2002, the employee testified that he got a call from Terry Webster advising him to report to Minnesota with the splicing truck and other equipment. The employee indicated that he did not want to go due to preexisting matters at his home. It was agreed that he did not have to report to Minnesota with the rest of his crew. Mr. Hawley indicated that he knew that 360 was in financial trouble and that the other splicing crews had been laid off.

Mr. Hawley testified that a few days prior to February 1, 2002, Terry Webster called and advised him that he was going to be laid off and that Mr. Webster wanted to pick up 360 property. Mr. Hawley testified that there was a dispute regarding the 360 property he had at his property over storage fees, and an additional dispute over money he felt 360 owed him regarding the trailer. In a telephone call with Mr. Webster, the employee advised Mr. Webster that he was not going to allow anyone to take possession of the 360 property that he had at his property, and that in addition he was not going to allow anyone on his property to recover the property.

A couple of days later the employee testified that Allen Hemrich called and said that he was on his way to pick up the 360 property. Mr. Hawley testified that he told Mr. Hemrich that he was not going to be allowed to pick up the 360 property or to come on his property due to disputes over what he claimed 360 owed him. On January 29, 2002, when Mr. Hemrich called, the employee told him he could not pick up anything, as he was busy. On January 31, 2002, Mr. Hawley testified that when Mr. Hemrich called and told him he was on his way to pick up equipment, he advised Mr. Hemrich that unless he got a list of equipment that 360 wanted, he would not turn over any property. After Mr. Hemrich faxed a list, the employee advised he would not return some property.

Mr. Hemrich called at about 9:30 A.M. on February 1, 2002, and said he would be there about noon. On that day about 10:45 A.M., Mr. Hawley informed Mr. Hemrich that he had a job interview at noon and he would not be available until after the meeting.

Mr. Hawley testified that before Mr. Hemrich arrived at his property to take possession of 360 equipment he told Mr. Hemrich that the splice truck was stuck in the mud and had bad brakes. Additionally, the employee testified that he had taken all of the 360 property that was in the truck and loaded it onto a trailer. He then drove it to the edge of his property line where he placed the property on the ground. Included in this property was a generator.

Mr. Hawley testified that Mr. Hemrich arrived, and they met at an access road adjacent to his property at about 2:15 P.M. on February 1, 2002. Mr. Hemrich asked for and was given permission to turn his truck around on the employee's property. The employee testified that he would not let Mr. Hemrich near the splice truck as he felt they were too aggressive. The splice truck nor the trailer could be seen from the area where the employee placed the 360 equipme

Full decision text continues in the plain-text archive copy.

Related Decisions

affirmed

The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirmed the Administrative Law Judge's award allowing workers' compensation benefits to Theresa Thompson for a low back injury sustained on July 20, 2010 while lifting and shelving copper coils. The claimant was entitled to temporary total disability benefits, permanent partial disability compensation, and medical aid totaling over $223,000, with additional underpayment and back pay amounts owed.

back12,259 words

Brown v. Noranda Aluminum, Inc.(2023)

February 3, 2023#16-027102

affirmed

The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirmed the administrative law judge's award granting permanent total disability compensation to Donald Brown for his work-related injuries to his back and left elbow. The Commission rejected the Second Injury Fund's argument that an anxiety disability should be considered in the PTD determination, finding that non-qualifying psychiatric disabilities need not be factored into the analysis.

back7,339 words

The Commission modified the ALJ's award to allow compensation for unpaid past medical expenses for employee Rodney Battles, who sustained a work-related back injury on October 5, 2016, requiring two back surgeries. The decision clarifies that an employer's duty to provide statutorily-required medical aid is absolute and unqualified under Missouri workers' compensation law.

back6,444 words

Gourley v. Cox Medical Center(2021)

December 15, 2021#07-031701

affirmed

The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirmed the administrative law judge's award allowing workers' compensation benefits for Carol Gourley's injury sustained on January 13, 2007 at Cox Medical Center. One commissioner dissented, arguing the ALJ erred in denying payment for unpaid medical bills ($173,896.25) and temporary total disability benefits ($109,574.64) related to the compensable 2007 injury.

back12,971 words

Comer v. Central Programs, Inc.(2021)

August 11, 2021#16-085212

affirmed

The Commission affirmed the Administrative Law Judge's award of permanent total disability compensation, finding the employee's November 1, 2016 back injury combined with qualifying preexisting disabilities met statutory requirements for Second Injury Fund liability. The employee's preexisting lower left extremity and thoracic disabilities, each exceeding fifty weeks of permanent partial disability, directly aggravated and accelerated the primary work-related back injury resulting in permanent total disability.

back14,532 words