Lorenzo Garcia, Kansas resident, is a 54-year-old former concrete worker. Garcia worked for Collene Concrete located in Kansas City, Kansas as a working foreman. Garcia's job duties included supervision and assistance with fabrication and installation of commercial and residential concrete slabs, driveways and foundations, etc. Garcia was involved in tear-out, setting forms, pouring concrete, measuring and concrete finish work. Collene Concrete performs jobs for clients in Missouri, Kansas and Oklahoma.
On April 23, 2003, Garcia testified that he was performing "flat job" work at a warehouse. Garcia does not remember the name of the warehouse or where the jobsite was specifically located. Garcia believed the jobsite to be in Missouri, possibly near I-70 and an unidentified golf course.
Garcia was driving a concrete buggy. Garcia was in line to load up with concrete when another buggy hit him from behind. Garcia injured his low back. Garcia was sent for medical treatment the following day.
Garcia received conservative treatment, including epidural steroid injections. Garcia was diagnosed with multi-level degenerative disc disease with right disc protrusion at L5-S1. Garcia was released with permanent restrictions of 25 pounds lifting, limited stooping, bending and alternate sit/stand option. Garcia received a workers' compensation settlement of 12.5 percent body as a whole or $\ 17,006. Garcia did not return to concrete work following his 4/23/03 injury. Garcia did attempt to obtain employment with a laundry mat but quit within a week due to pain in his back.
Garcia has limited educational background. Garcia has a ninth grade education and no GED. Garcia has no vocational or other formal training. Garcia testified that he is unable to read or write.
Garcia has an extensive history of prior injuries. In 1972 Garcia sustained a right arm and left ankle injury from a tire explosion. Garcia received surgery and internal fixation for a fractured right arm and left ankle. Garcia was able to return to work after a nine-month recovery. Garcia continues to have complaints of left ankle pain and difficulty with walking and kneeling. Garcia still has the hardware in place in his right arm and left ankle.
Garcia had a right knee injury in 1995. Garcia had surgery and was off work for a period of time. Garcia had trouble with kneeling, climbing and steps following his right knee injury. Garcia had a cervical disc injury in 1991. Garcia received conservative treatment for this injury. Garcia was off work for approximately one year.
In 1999, Garcia fell in a hole and tore ligaments and muscles in his left knee. Garcia had two surgeries on the left knee after he tripped and fell another time following the initial surgery. In 2001, Garcia broke his hand while drilling a wall. Garcia had surgery on the hand and was off work for approximately three months. Garcia indicated he had been diagnosed in 2001 or 2002 with bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome, which he has described common among concrete finishers. Mr. Garcia was prescribed braces for both wrists. Garcia testified to ongoing problems with each of these injuries for which he received workers' compensation settlements.
Garcia was evaluated by Dr. Koprivica on December 19, 2003. Dr. Koprivica testified that Garcia had significant preexisting disability that was a hindrance or obstacle to his employment or reemployment. Dr. Koprivica specifically attributes 25 percent permanent partial disability to Garcia's left ankle, 35 percent permanent partial disability to his right knee, 40 percent permanent partial disability to his left knee, 15 percent body as a whole to cervical problems, and 20 percent permanent partial disability to his right forearm all predating Garcia's injury ON April 23, 2003. Dr. Koprivica believes that Garcia is permanently and totally disabled as a result of the combined effects of his April 23, 2003 injury and his preexisting disabilities.
Michael Dreiling, vocational expert, evaluated Garcia on February 16, 2004. Mr. Dreiling opined that Garcia was permanently and totally disabled and unable to compete in the open labor market. Mr. Dreiling believes considering Garcia's significant physical restrictions, work history and limited education, no reasonable employer would be expected to hire him.
The Second Injury Fund denies Garcia and his employer, Collene Concrete, were operating under and subject to the provisions of the Missouri workers' compensation law.
Missouri workers' compensation coverage extends to all injuries received in this state. §287.110.2 provides:
"This chapter shall apply to all injuries received and occupational diseases contracted in this state regardless of where the contract of employment was made and also to all injuries received and occupational diseases contracted outside of this state under contract of employment made in this state unless the contract of employment in any case shall otherwise provide and also to all injuries received and occupational disease contracted outside of this state where the employee's employment was principally localized in this state."
Missouri courts have held that the claimant has the burden of proof in showing Missouri workers' compensation statutes apply to his case. "The general rule is that claimant has the burden of proof as to his right to compensation under the Missouri workers' compensation statute." Redden v. Dan Redden Company, 859 S.W.2d 207, 210 (Mo Court App 1993). The burden of proof as to the applicability of the Missouri workers' compensation resides with the person asserting the benefits under the act, Hogue v. Wurdack, 298 S.W.2d 492, 499 (Mo Court App 1957).
When it comes to jurisdiction, the claimant has to bring facts to bear that decisively place the case properly in Missouri courts. For facts that are critical to jurisdiction, the claimant bears the burden of sustaining those facts "both as to proof and persuasion". Hall v. Denver Chicago International, Inc., 481 S.W.2d 622, 625 (Mo. Court App. 1972) "The claimant must prove the Industrial Commission had jurisdiction over the subject matter" id 627 (even where a report of injury is filled out in accordance with Missouri law, claimant was still properly denied benefits when he failed