Skip to content
Ott Law Firm

Elizabeth Caccia-Nelson v. Dierberg's Markets

Decision date: April 26, 20068 pages

Summary

The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirmed the Administrative Law Judge's award of workers' compensation to Elizabeth Caccia-Nelson for a low back and hip injury sustained on February 11, 2000, while lifting a cauldron of icing at Dierberg's Markets. The claimant was awarded 20 weeks of permanent partial disability compensation totaling $5,401.60 for 5% permanent partial disability.

Archive Notice

This archive contains published Missouri Labor and Industrial Relations Commission workers' compensation decisions reproduced for research convenience. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Legal Help

Practical guidance for this decision

Third-Party Injury Check

This workers' comp decision may point to a separate injury claim.

  • A driver, contractor, property owner, or equipment company may share fault.
  • The injury involved a vehicle, unsafe premises, defective equipment, or a non-employer vendor.
  • A serious injury or death may need both benefits review and civil-claim analysis.

Caption

FINAL AWARD ALLOWING COMPENSATION

(Affirming Award and Decision of Administrative Law Judge)

Injury No.: 00-013741

Employee: Elizabeth Caccia-Nelson

Employer: Dierberg's Markets

Insurer: Self-Insured

c/o Corporate Claims Management

Date of Accident: February 11, 2000

Place and County of Accident: St. Louis, Missouri

The above-entitled workers' compensation case is submitted to the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) for review as provided by section 287.480 RSMo. Having reviewed the evidence and considered the whole record, the Commission finds that the award of the administrative law judge is supported by competent and substantial evidence and was made in accordance with the Missouri Workers' Compensation Act. Pursuant to section 286.090 RSMo, the Commission affirms the award and decision of the administrative law judge dated December 23, 2005. The award and decision of Administrative Law Judge Margaret D. Landolt, issued December 23, 2005, is attached and incorporated by this reference.

The Commission further approves and affirms the administrative law judge's allowance of attorney's fee herein as being fair and reasonable.

Any past due compensation shall bear interest as provided by law.

Given at Jefferson City, State of Missouri, this $26^{\text {th }}$ day of April 2006.

LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION

William F. Ringer, Chairman

Alice A. Bartlett, Member

John J. Hickey, Member

Attest:

Secretary

AWARD

Dependents:N/ABefore the
Division of Workers’
Employer:Dierberg’s MarketsCompensation
Department of Labor and Industrial
Additional Party:N/ARelations of Missouri
Jefferson City, Missouri
Insurer:Self-Insured c/o Corporate Claims Management
Hearing Date:November 10, 2005Checked by: MDL:tr

FINDINGS OF FACT AND RULINGS OF LAW

  1. Are any benefits awarded herein? Yes
  2. Was the injury or occupational disease compensable under Chapter 287? Yes
  3. Was there an accident or incident of occupational disease under the Law? Yes
  4. Date of accident or onset of occupational disease: February 11, 2000
  5. State location where accident occurred or occupational disease was contracted: St. Louis, Missouri
  6. Was above employee in employ of above employer at time of alleged accident or occupational disease? Yes
  7. Did employer receive proper notice? Yes
  8. Did accident or occupational disease arise out of and in the course of the employment? Yes
  9. Was claim for compensation filed within time required by Law? Yes
  10. Was employer insured by above insurer? Yes
  11. Describe work employee was doing and how accident occurred or occupational disease contracted: Employee was lifting a cauldron of icing when she felt pain in her low back and right hip.
  12. Did accident or occupational disease cause death? No Date of death? N/A
  13. Part(s) of body injured by accident or occupational disease: Body as a whole referable to hip and low back
  14. Nature and extent of any permanent disability: 5% permanent partial disability referable to the low back and hip
  15. Compensation paid to-date for temporary disability: -0-
  16. Value necessary medical aid paid to date by employer/insurer? $3,224.15

Employee: Elizabeth Caccia-Nelson Injury No.: 00-013741

  1. Value necessary medical aid not furnished by employer/insurer? -0-
  2. Employee’s average weekly wages: 405.12
  3. Weekly compensation rate: 270.08/$270.08
  4. Method wages computation: Stipulation

COMPENSATION PAYABLE

  1. Amount of compensation payable: 20 weeks of permanent partial disability from Employer $5,401.60
  1. Second Injury Fund liability: No
  2. Future requirements awarded: N/A

Said payments to begin immediately and to be payable and be subject to modification and review as provided by law.

The compensation awarded to the claimant shall be subject to a lien in the amount of 25 % of all payments hereunder in favor of the following attorney for necessary legal services rendered to the claimant:

David Plufka

FINDINGS OF FACT and RULINGS OF LAW:

Employee:Elizabeth Caccia-NelsonInjury No.: 00-013741
Dependents:N/ABefore the <br> Division of Workers'
Employer:Dierberg's MarketsCompensation
Additional Party:N/ADepartment of Labor and Industrial <br> Relations of Missouri <br> Jefferson City, Missouri
Insurer:Self-Insured c/o Corporate Claims ManagementChecked by: MDL:tr

PRELIMINARIES

A hearing was held on November 10, 2005, at the Division of Workers’ Compensation in the City of St. Louis. Elizabeth Caccia-Nelson (Claimant) was represented by Mr. David Plufka. Dierbergs Markets (Employer) and its Insurer, Self c/o Corporate Claims, were represented by Ms. Loretta Simon. Mr. Plufka requested a fee of 25 % of Claimant's award.

The parties stipulated that on or about February 11, 2000, Claimant was an employee of Employer; venue is proper in the City of St. Louis; Employer received proper notice of injury; and the claim was timely filed. The parties further stipulated that Claimant was earning an average weekly wage of $\ 405.12 resulting in rates of compensation of $\ 270.08 for temporary total disability benefits and $\ 270.08 for permanent partial disability benefits. Employer paid no temporary total disability benefits and paid medical benefits of $\ 3,224.15.

The issues for resolution by hearing are: medical causation; liability of Employer for past medical benefits; liability of Employer for temporary total disability benefits from February 12, 2003 through March 11, 2003; and nature and extent of permanent partial disability.

Based upon the competent and substantial evidence, I find:

Claimant is a 37-year-old woman who was employed by Employer as a cake decorator. Her job duties consisted of rolling large cauldron bowls of icing into the cake room, and tilting the bowls so that the icing would fill five-gallon buckets which were then sealed. She also decorated cakes, cleared the cake area, and loaded cakes into large trays. Claimant testified that she spent about two hours of her day lifting.

On February 11, 2000, Claimant was attempting to lift one side of a large, cauldron bowl of icing with a partner, when the rolling gurney underneath the bowl moved. She tried to keep the icing bowl from falling when she then heard a pop in her back and felt immediate pain in her lower back and right hip. Claimant was able to complete her shift, but later that day she began to have complaints of pain down her right leg.

Claimant testified she first received authorized treatment from Acute Care Center. The records note she treated with Dr. Prusacyk who diagnosed her with a lumbar and right hip strain. Claimant was prescribed medication, underwent lumbar and right hip x-rays, which were negative, and followed up for three visits to the Acute Care Center. Dr. Prusacyk also ordered a course of water therapy at the Aquatic Fitness Center. On March 2, 2000, she noted continued lumbar complaints with right sciatica. She was then referred to Dr. Samson.

Dr. Samson first examined Claimant on March 9, 2000. Dr. Samson diagnosed right sciatica and ordered an MRI of her back and her hip. The MRI was taken on March 9, 2000 and revealed mild mid-line degenerative disc change at L5-S1. Dr. Samson's report dated March 16, 2000 noted that the MRI revealed degenerative disc disease at L5-S1, but no disc herniation. An MRI obtained of Claimant's right hip was negative for any abnormalities. Dr. Samson diagnosed Claimant with a right hip and back strain on March 20, 2000.

Claimant did not return to Dr. Samson until July 12, 2000. Although she noted some complaints in her low back and right hip, Dr. Samson noted she really sought treatment that day due to chest pain. After examination, Dr. Samson had no further recommendations for care of her right hip or back, and he opined Claimant's chest pain was unrelated to the February 2000 incident. Dr. Samson diagnosed right hip and back strain and right anterior chest wall pain.

On November 13, 2000, Dr. Samson opined that Claimant has sustained a right hip and low back strain from the February 2000 incident. He assessed her with a 2 % permanent partial disability based on her ongoing complaints.

Following her release from Dr. Samson, Claimant did not seek any additional medical treatment for her back and hip until March 2002, and other than two or three days immediately following her work accident, Claimant did not miss any time from work until February 2003, approximately three years after the accident.

Claimant continued to work as a cake decorator doing her normal job duties after February 11, 2000. Claimant had assistance putting the cake trays on the rolling cart. She also noted that the job duties of all the cake decorators changed, as they no longer had to lift the cauldrons of icing to place the icing into the buckets. However, she continued to lift on a daily basis in her job duties at Employer.

Claimant testified that she left her job at Employer because she wanted to move into management and make more money. In her application for employment at Home Depot, Claimant stated that she left her employment at Employer because she wanted to be closer to home. Neither her hearing testimony, nor her Home Depot application, mention that she left Employer due to continued back pain. The only record which notes she left her employment at Employer because of her work injury is in Dr. Gornet's medical record dated October 7, 2002, approximately two years after the incident.

When Claimant was hired at Home Depot, she signed a job profile for a department sales person on November 28,

  1. By signing this profile, she agreed that her job at Home Depot had physical requirements, including the need to climb ladders, bend, stoop, twist, reach, and climb. Her agreement also stated she may have to lift up to 95 pounds without assistance. By signing this document on November 28, 2000, Claimant agreed that she understood these requirements and was able to complete them.

At Home Depot, Claimant worked full time setting up a new store from December 2000 until January 10, 2001. She hung wallpaper, put out carpet samples, stocked shelves, and placed small tools in their appropriate locations. She constantly stacked and moved things during the set-up of the store. Claimant also agreed that she had to bend over and open boxes during this set up. Claimant did not miss any work during this time period nor did she seek any treatment for back or right hip pain.

Claimant also testified that after the Home Depot store opened, she continued to work in the wallpaper department as a sales associate, which required her to stock wallpaper. Claimant also moved a heavy cart stacked with boxes once per week. She testified that she never sought any treatment for her back or right hip while working in the wallpaper department.

Claimant also testified that Home Depot required the use of heavy machinery. She operated a forklift, a dolly, a handcart machine, and a picker machine. When using the forklift, Claimant had to scoot items onto or off a platform. These items included boxes of tile, toilets, vanities, and tub enclosures.

In addition to working in the wallpaper department, Claimant testified that she was first promoted to kitchen designer, then to a supervisor, and finally to an assistant store manager at Home Depot. When Claimant was promoted to supervisor at Home Depot, she signed a new agreement on August 20, 2001. By signing this agreement, she agreed that she could do things such as bend, stoop, lift, reach, and climb ladders. She noted that as a supervisor she would have to fill in for employees in other departments as needed, and that as a store manager she is on her feet all day.

Claimant also testified that she painted multiple walls in her home and put up wallpaper border in her kitchen and her son's bedroom in 2001. Her painting required her to use a ladder.

Claimant also played in one-half of a r

Full decision text continues in the plain-text archive copy.

Related Decisions

affirmed

The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirmed the Administrative Law Judge's award allowing workers' compensation benefits to Theresa Thompson for a low back injury sustained on July 20, 2010 while lifting and shelving copper coils. The claimant was entitled to temporary total disability benefits, permanent partial disability compensation, and medical aid totaling over $223,000, with additional underpayment and back pay amounts owed.

back12,259 words

Brown v. Noranda Aluminum, Inc.(2023)

February 3, 2023#16-027102

affirmed

The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirmed the administrative law judge's award granting permanent total disability compensation to Donald Brown for his work-related injuries to his back and left elbow. The Commission rejected the Second Injury Fund's argument that an anxiety disability should be considered in the PTD determination, finding that non-qualifying psychiatric disabilities need not be factored into the analysis.

back7,339 words

The Commission modified the ALJ's award to allow compensation for unpaid past medical expenses for employee Rodney Battles, who sustained a work-related back injury on October 5, 2016, requiring two back surgeries. The decision clarifies that an employer's duty to provide statutorily-required medical aid is absolute and unqualified under Missouri workers' compensation law.

back6,444 words

Gourley v. Cox Medical Center(2021)

December 15, 2021#07-031701

affirmed

The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirmed the administrative law judge's award allowing workers' compensation benefits for Carol Gourley's injury sustained on January 13, 2007 at Cox Medical Center. One commissioner dissented, arguing the ALJ erred in denying payment for unpaid medical bills ($173,896.25) and temporary total disability benefits ($109,574.64) related to the compensable 2007 injury.

back12,971 words

Comer v. Central Programs, Inc.(2021)

August 11, 2021#16-085212

affirmed

The Commission affirmed the Administrative Law Judge's award of permanent total disability compensation, finding the employee's November 1, 2016 back injury combined with qualifying preexisting disabilities met statutory requirements for Second Injury Fund liability. The employee's preexisting lower left extremity and thoracic disabilities, each exceeding fifty weeks of permanent partial disability, directly aggravated and accelerated the primary work-related back injury resulting in permanent total disability.

back14,532 words