The parties requested the Division to determine:
1) whether Apolinar Sandoval was employed by Michael Schlup, Schlup Investments, Inc., or Plaza Gardens on the Lake;
2) whether Continental Western has workers' compensation liability under its policy with Schlup Investments, Inc.
Apolinar Sandoval was killed while installing arches on terraces at the Plaza Gardens on the Lake construction project. Sandoval was standing with a co-worker Hector Torres on a make-shift platform when Sandoval lost his balance. Sandoval fell pulling Torres with him. Torres and Sandoval fell approximately 4 stories down to the ground. Torres lost consciousness. Sandoval died at the scene.
The insurer Continental Western takes the position that Sandoval was not an employee of Schlup Investments, Inc.,
The only testimony regarding Apolinar Sandoval's employment came from Hernon Simonetti. Simonetti, an employee of Schlup Investments, Inc., hired individuals to work for the company. Simonetti testified Sandoval had worked with him for $11 / 2$ to 2 years. Sandoval was a friend of his father. Simonetti said Sandoval was hired by his father in Kansas and performed general maintenance and repair work at Plaza Gardens South and Plaza Gardens on the Lake. Both are Schlup properties. Simonetti testified that Sandoval was sent to help with construction at the Plaza Gardens on the Lake project.
Mike Schlup testified that any construction workers who were hired to work at the Plaza Gardens on the Lake project were employees of Schlup Investments, Inc. Schlup testified that Plaza Gardens on the Lake is a development company. He testified that Plaza Gardens on the Lake does not employ any construction workers. Schlup Investments, Inc., is the general contractor for the construction aspect of the Plaza Gardens on the Lake and is responsible for employing the construction workers necessary to do the actual building and construction work.
Elbert Pardon, Schlup Investments, Inc., and Plaza Gardens on the Lake employee, testified that he would manage and pay the workers hired to perform services for the Lake project. Pardon would take "roll call," assign tasks, supervise and pay the workers in cash. All records developed as a result of the "roll call" have been destroyed.
There is no dispute as to the lack of formalities of alleged employment with Schlup Investments, Inc. There
were no applications for employment. There are no employment files. There are no W-2 forms. A social security card was not required. A Green Card was not required. An address was not obtained. Telephone numbers were not obtained. Dependent information was not obtained. Federal income taxes were not withheld from pay. Social security was not withheld. Medicare was not withheld from pay. Time cards were not maintained. "Roll call" sheets have been destroyed. No payroll account reflects payments because "employees" were paid in cash. No documentary evidence of any kind prior to the accident or in the week or two after the accident exists which indicate the employees worked for Schlup Investments, Inc.
Missouri law does not require an express contract, either written or verbal, to establish the employee-employer relationship. See Kelsall v. Riss \& Co., 165 S.W.2d 329 (Mo. App. 1942). The employment may be implied or presumed from the acts of the parties. Id. In order to determine whether or not an employment relationship exists, Missouri courts apply a two-factor test known as the "controllable services test." See Lynn v. Lloyd A. Lynn, Inc., 493 S.W.2d 363 (Mo.App. 1973). The first factor is that the worker must be "in the service" of the alleged employer. Id. Secondly, the services must be controlled by the alleged employer. Id, see also Howard v. Winebrenner, 499 S.W.2d 389 (Mo. 1973). "Service" has been defined as the performance of labor for the benefit of another. Id.
In this case, Mr. Sandoval was "in the service" of Schlup Investments, Inc., i.e., he was performing labor for the benefit of Schlup Investments, Inc. Mr. Sandoval's services were also being controlled by Schlup Investments, Inc.
Despite Schlup's inconsistent testimony surround the employment arrangement, I find based on the testimony of Pardon, Simonetti, Schlup and applicable Missouri law that Apolinar Sandoval was an employee of Schlup Investments, Inc.
Since I have found Sandoval to be an employee of Schlup Investments, Inc., a determination must be made whether Schlup Investments, Inc., is insured for workers' compensation.
Schlup Investment's policy of workers' compensation insurance is a Kansas policy of insurance that applies generally to employee claims for workers' compensation benefits filed against the employer-insured (Schlup Investments, Inc.) in the state of Kansas. The policy of workers' compensation and employers' liability insurance includes a Residual Market Limited and Other States Insurance Endorsement (hereinafter "Other States Provision") that extends coverage in certain limited situations to claims for workers' compensation and claims for money damages against the insured that are filed in states other than Kansas. The Other States Provision insurance coverage afforded by the policy of workers' compensation issued to Schlup Investments, Inc., is applicable only if all three of the following conditions are met:
a. The employee claiming benefits was either hired under a contract of employment made in a state listed in Item 3.A of the Information Page (Kansas) or was, at the time of injury, principally employed in a state listed in Item 3.A of the Information Page (Kansas); and
b. The employee claiming benefits is not claiming benefits in a state where, at the time of injury, (i) you have other workers' compensation insurance coverage, or (ii) you were, by virtue of the nature of your operations in that state, required by that state's law to have obtained separate workers' compensation coverage, or (iii) you are an authorized self-insurer or participant in a self-insured group plan; and
c. The duration of the work being performed by the employee claiming benefits in the state for which that employee is claiming benefits is temporary.
The Other States Provision, contains at the bottom, in bold type, an "IMPORTANT NOTICE" which provides that "[i]f you hire any employees outside those states listed in Item 3.A on the Information Page or begin operations in any such state, you should do whatever may be required under that state's law, as this endorsement