Skip to content
Ott Law Firm

Apolinar Sandoval v. Schlup Investments, Inc.; Michael Schlup; Plaza Gardens on the Lake

Decision date: October 4, 20067 pages

Summary

The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirmed the Administrative Law Judge's award finding that employee Apolinar Sandoval's fatal fall on March 23, 2005 was a compensable work injury arising out of and in the course of his employment. Death benefits of $17,547.45 for 47 weeks plus ongoing weekly benefits of $373.35 were awarded to the deceased employee's dependents.

Archive Notice

This archive contains published Missouri Labor and Industrial Relations Commission workers' compensation decisions reproduced for research convenience. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Legal Help

Practical guidance for this decision

Third-Party Injury Check

This workers' comp decision may point to a separate injury claim.

  • A driver, contractor, property owner, or equipment company may share fault.
  • The injury involved a vehicle, unsafe premises, defective equipment, or a non-employer vendor.
  • A serious injury or death may need both benefits review and civil-claim analysis.

Caption

Issued by THE LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION
TEMPORARY OR PARTIAL AWARD (Affirming Award and Decision of Administrative Law Judge)
Injury No.: 05-075668
Employee:Apolinar Sandoval, deceased
Employers:1) Schlup Investments, Inc.
2) Michael Schlup
3) Plaza Gardens on the Lake
Insurer:Continental Western Insurance Company
Date of Accident:March 23, 2005
Place and County of Accident:Camden County, Missouri; venue Kansas City by agreement
The above-entitled workers’ compensation case is submitted to the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) for review as provided bysection 287.480 RSMo, which provides for review concerning the issue of liability only. Having reviewed the evidence and considered the whole record concerning the issue of liability, the Commission finds that the award of the administrative law judge in this regard is supported by competent andsubstantial evidence and was made in accordance with the Missouri Workers’ Compensation Act. Pursuant to section 286.090 RSMo, the Commission affirms and adopts the award and decision of the administrative law judge dated April 11,2006.
This award is only temporary or partial, is subject to further order and the proceedings are hereby continued and kept open until a final award can be made. All parties should be aware of the provisions ofsection 287.510 RSMo.
The award and decision of Administrative Law Judge Paula A. McKeon, issued attached and incorporated by this reference.April 11, 2006, is
Given at Jefferson City, State of Missouri, this 4th day of October 2006.
LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION
William F. Ringer, Chairman
Alice A. Bartlett, Member
John J. Hickey, Member
Attest:

TEMPORARY AWARD

Employee: Apolinar Sandoval (Deceased)

Injury No. 05-075668

Dependents: N/A

Employers: Schlup Investments, Inc.

Michael Schlup

Plaza Gardens on the Lake

Insurer: Continental Western Insurance Company

Additional Party: N/A

Hearing Date: February 17, 2006

Briefs Due:

Checked by: PAM/lh

FINDINGS OF FACT AND RULINGS OF LAW

  1. Are any benefits awarded herein? Yes.
  2. Was the injury or occupational disease compensable under Chapter 287? Yes.
  3. Was there an accident or incident of occupational disease under the Law? Yes.
  4. Date of accident or onset of occupational disease: March 23, 2005.
  5. State location where accident occurred or occupational disease was contracted: Camden County, Missouri; venue Kansas City by agreement.
  6. Was above employee in employ of above employer at time of alleged accident or occupational disease? Yes.
  7. Did employer receive proper notice? Yes.
  8. Did accident or occupational disease arise out of and in the course of the employment? Yes.
  9. Was claim for compensation filed within time required by Law? Yes.
  10. Was employer insured by above insurer? Yes.
  11. Describe work employee was doing and how accident occurred or occupational disease contracted: Apolinar Sandoval fell while in the course and scope of his employment.
  12. Did accident or occupational disease cause death? Yes. Date of death? May 23, 2005
  13. Part(s) of body injured by accident or occupational disease: N/A
  14. Nature and extent of any permanent disability: N/A
  15. Compensation paid to-date for temporary disability: None.
  16. Value necessary medical aid paid to date by employer/insurer? None.
  17. Value necessary medical aid not furnished by employer/insurer? N/A.
  1. Employee's average weekly wages: Not determined.
  2. Weekly compensation rate: $\ 373.35.
  3. Method wages computation: By agreement.

COMPENSATION PAYABLE

  1. Amount of compensation payable: Death benefits 47 weeks of past or $\ 17,547.45 through February 16, 2005 with ongoing weekly benefits of $\ 373.35 per week
  2. Second Injury Fund liability: N/A

TOTAL:

  1. Future requirements awarded: None.

Said payments to begin as of the date of this award and to be payable and be subject to modification and review as provided by law.

The compensation awarded to the claimant shall be subject to a lien in the amount of 25 percent of all payments hereunder in favor of the following attorney for necessary legal services rendered to the claimant: Angela Williams.

FINDINGS OF FACT and RULINGS OF LAW:

Employee: Apolinar Sandoval (Deceased) Injury No: 05-075668

Dependents: N/A

Employers: Schlup Investments, Inc.

Michael Schlup

Plaza Gardens on the Lake

Insurer: Continental Western Insurance Company

Additional Party: N/A

Hearing Date: February 17, 2006

Briefs Due:

Checked by: PAM/lh

On February 17, 2006, the parties appeared for hearing the Employee. Apolinar Sandoval, deceased, appears by counsel Angela Williams. The Employer Michael Schlup, Schlup Investments, Inc., and Plaza Gardens on the Lake appears and is represented by Theresa Otto and Clayton Fielder. Steven Quinn also appears for the Employer Schlup Investments, Inc., only. Continental Western appears through its counsel Eric Lanham. Joe Ebbert and Michael Belancio appear for Claimants Medina and Torres.

STIPULATIONS

At the hearing the parties stipulated to the following:

1) that Apolinar Sandoval sustained an accident arising out of and in the course of his employment on March 25,2005 , which resulted in his death;

2) that Apolinar Sandoval is entitled to death benefits of $\ 17,547.45 for 47 weeks through February 16, 2006, with ongoing benefits at a compensation rate of $\ 373.35 per week.

ISSUES

The parties requested the Division to determine:

1) whether Apolinar Sandoval was employed by Michael Schlup, Schlup Investments, Inc., or Plaza Gardens on the Lake;

2) whether Continental Western has workers' compensation liability under its policy with Schlup Investments, Inc.

Apolinar Sandoval was killed while installing arches on terraces at the Plaza Gardens on the Lake construction project. Sandoval was standing with a co-worker Hector Torres on a make-shift platform when Sandoval lost his balance. Sandoval fell pulling Torres with him. Torres and Sandoval fell approximately 4 stories down to the ground. Torres lost consciousness. Sandoval died at the scene.

The insurer Continental Western takes the position that Sandoval was not an employee of Schlup Investments, Inc.,

The only testimony regarding Apolinar Sandoval's employment came from Hernon Simonetti. Simonetti, an employee of Schlup Investments, Inc., hired individuals to work for the company. Simonetti testified Sandoval had worked with him for $11 / 2$ to 2 years. Sandoval was a friend of his father. Simonetti said Sandoval was hired by his father in Kansas and performed general maintenance and repair work at Plaza Gardens South and Plaza Gardens on the Lake. Both are Schlup properties. Simonetti testified that Sandoval was sent to help with construction at the Plaza Gardens on the Lake project.

Mike Schlup testified that any construction workers who were hired to work at the Plaza Gardens on the Lake project were employees of Schlup Investments, Inc. Schlup testified that Plaza Gardens on the Lake is a development company. He testified that Plaza Gardens on the Lake does not employ any construction workers. Schlup Investments, Inc., is the general contractor for the construction aspect of the Plaza Gardens on the Lake and is responsible for employing the construction workers necessary to do the actual building and construction work.

Elbert Pardon, Schlup Investments, Inc., and Plaza Gardens on the Lake employee, testified that he would manage and pay the workers hired to perform services for the Lake project. Pardon would take "roll call," assign tasks, supervise and pay the workers in cash. All records developed as a result of the "roll call" have been destroyed.

There is no dispute as to the lack of formalities of alleged employment with Schlup Investments, Inc. There

were no applications for employment. There are no employment files. There are no W-2 forms. A social security card was not required. A Green Card was not required. An address was not obtained. Telephone numbers were not obtained. Dependent information was not obtained. Federal income taxes were not withheld from pay. Social security was not withheld. Medicare was not withheld from pay. Time cards were not maintained. "Roll call" sheets have been destroyed. No payroll account reflects payments because "employees" were paid in cash. No documentary evidence of any kind prior to the accident or in the week or two after the accident exists which indicate the employees worked for Schlup Investments, Inc.

Missouri law does not require an express contract, either written or verbal, to establish the employee-employer relationship. See Kelsall v. Riss \& Co., 165 S.W.2d 329 (Mo. App. 1942). The employment may be implied or presumed from the acts of the parties. Id. In order to determine whether or not an employment relationship exists, Missouri courts apply a two-factor test known as the "controllable services test." See Lynn v. Lloyd A. Lynn, Inc., 493 S.W.2d 363 (Mo.App. 1973). The first factor is that the worker must be "in the service" of the alleged employer. Id. Secondly, the services must be controlled by the alleged employer. Id, see also Howard v. Winebrenner, 499 S.W.2d 389 (Mo. 1973). "Service" has been defined as the performance of labor for the benefit of another. Id.

In this case, Mr. Sandoval was "in the service" of Schlup Investments, Inc., i.e., he was performing labor for the benefit of Schlup Investments, Inc. Mr. Sandoval's services were also being controlled by Schlup Investments, Inc.

Despite Schlup's inconsistent testimony surround the employment arrangement, I find based on the testimony of Pardon, Simonetti, Schlup and applicable Missouri law that Apolinar Sandoval was an employee of Schlup Investments, Inc.

Since I have found Sandoval to be an employee of Schlup Investments, Inc., a determination must be made whether Schlup Investments, Inc., is insured for workers' compensation.

Schlup Investment's policy of workers' compensation insurance is a Kansas policy of insurance that applies generally to employee claims for workers' compensation benefits filed against the employer-insured (Schlup Investments, Inc.) in the state of Kansas. The policy of workers' compensation and employers' liability insurance includes a Residual Market Limited and Other States Insurance Endorsement (hereinafter "Other States Provision") that extends coverage in certain limited situations to claims for workers' compensation and claims for money damages against the insured that are filed in states other than Kansas. The Other States Provision insurance coverage afforded by the policy of workers' compensation issued to Schlup Investments, Inc., is applicable only if all three of the following conditions are met:

a. The employee claiming benefits was either hired under a contract of employment made in a state listed in Item 3.A of the Information Page (Kansas) or was, at the time of injury, principally employed in a state listed in Item 3.A of the Information Page (Kansas); and

b. The employee claiming benefits is not claiming benefits in a state where, at the time of injury, (i) you have other workers' compensation insurance coverage, or (ii) you were, by virtue of the nature of your operations in that state, required by that state's law to have obtained separate workers' compensation coverage, or (iii) you are an authorized self-insurer or participant in a self-insured group plan; and

c. The duration of the work being performed by the employee claiming benefits in the state for which that employee is claiming benefits is temporary.

The Other States Provision, contains at the bottom, in bold type, an "IMPORTANT NOTICE" which provides that "[i]f you hire any employees outside those states listed in Item 3.A on the Information Page or begin operations in any such state, you should do whatever may be required under that state's law, as this endorsement

Full decision text continues in the plain-text archive copy.

Related Decisions

affirmed

The LIRC affirmed the Administrative Law Judge's determination that Birnamwood Condominium Association was a statutory employer and that Meyers Trees & More, LLC was not properly insured under Missouri workers' compensation law. An employee of Meyers Trees was injured while performing tree-trimming work at the condominium complex after slipping off a roof.

fall8,447 words
affirmed

The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirmed the administrative law judge's award denying workers' compensation to employee Shelly Dale for injuries sustained in a fall. The Commission dismissed the employee's application for review as failing to meet procedural requirements under Commission rule 8 CSR 20-3.030(3)(A) for insufficient specificity in identifying the issues contested.

fall7,673 words

The LIRC affirmed the ALJ's award allowing past and future medical compensation for Cynthia G. Null's work-related injuries sustained from a fall on ice in the employer's parking lot on December 24, 2012. The Commission rejected the employer's argument that the work injury must be the prevailing factor in causing the need for future medical treatment, finding that § 287.140 does not impose such a strict standard for medical benefits.

fall27,478 words

The Commission affirmed the administrative law judge's award allowing workers' compensation benefits to employee Lois McDowell for injuries sustained from catching a two-wheeled cart on a doorway and falling in the hospital parking garage. A dissenting opinion argued the injury was not causally connected to employment because the risk of falling was equally present in normal nonemployment life.

fall6,129 words
affirmed

The Commission affirmed the administrative law judge's award granting workers' compensation benefits to Gale Hardwick for a fall injury sustained on October 9, 2014, while working at a Conagra Foods facility. The employee was determined to be totally and permanently disabled and is entitled to permanent total disability benefits of $486.17 per week beginning May 8, 2015.

fall6,798 words