OTT LAW

Bryan Portell v. Ford Motor Company

Decision date: November 22, 20065 pages

Summary

The Commission affirmed the Administrative Law Judge's decision denying workers' compensation benefits to Bryan Portell for an alleged injury to his neck and upper back sustained while operating a hoist on May 29, 2002. The claim was denied because the injury did not arise out of and in the course of employment, as the injury resulted from sneezing rather than a work-related accident.

Caption

FINAL AWARD DENYING COMPENSATION

(Affirming Award and Decision of Administrative Law Judge with Correction)

Injury No.: 02-056663

Employee: Bryan Portell

Employer: Ford Motor Company

Insurer: Self-Insured

Additional Party: Treasurer of Missouri as Custodian of Second Injury Fund (Open)

Date of Accident: Alleged May 29, 2002

Place and County of Accident: St. Louis County, Missouri

The above-entitled workers' compensation case is submitted to the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) for review as provided by section 287.480 RSMo. Having reviewed the evidence and considered the whole record, the Commission finds that the award of the administrative law judge, as corrected herein, is supported by competent and substantial evidence and was made in accordance with the Missouri Workers' Compensation Act. Pursuant to section 286.090 RSMo, the Commission affirms the award and decision of the administrative law judge dated July 12, 2006, and awards no compensation in the above-captioned case.

Paragraph five of the Findings of Fact is corrected to read as follows: Dr. Oliver, Claimant's personal doctor, saw the Claimant and he referred him to a Chiropractor, Dr. Goodwin. Claimant saw Dr, Goodwin a couple times and then came under the care of another chiropractor, Dr. Hendricks, who saw him from June 7, 2002, through September 13, 2002. Dr. Hendricks gave him electrical muscle stimulations and manipulations.

The award and decision of Administrative Law Judge Cornelius T. Lane, issued July 12, 2006, is attached and incorporated by this reference.

Given at Jefferson City, State of Missouri, this $22^{\text {nd }}$ day of November 2006.

LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION

William F. Ringer, Chairman

Alice A. Bartlett, Member

John J. Hickey, Member

Attest:

Secretary

AWARD

Dependents:N/ABefore the
Division of Workers’
Employer:Ford Motor CompanyCompensation
Additional Party:Second Injury Fund (Open)Department of Labor and Industrial
Relations of Missouri
Jefferson City, Missouri
Insurer:Self-Insured
Hearing Date:June 8, 2006Checked by: CTL:tr

FINDINGS OF FACT AND RULINGS OF LAW

  1. Are any benefits awarded herein? No
  2. Was the injury or occupational disease compensable under Chapter 287? No
  3. Was there an accident or incident of occupational disease under the Law? No
  4. Date of accident or onset of occupational disease: Alleged May 29, 2002
  5. State location where accident occurred or occupational disease was contracted: St. Louis County, Mo.
  6. Was above employee in employ of above employer at time of alleged accident or occupational disease? Yes
  7. Did employer receive proper notice? Yes
  8. Did accident or occupational disease arise out of and in the course of the employment? No
  9. Was claim for compensation filed within time required by Law? Yes
  10. Was employer insured by above insurer? Self-Insured
  11. Describe work employee was doing and how accident occurred or occupational disease contracted: While operating a hoist, Claimant sustained injury to his upper back and neck while sneezing.
  12. Did accident or occupational disease cause death? No Date of death? N/A
  13. $\operatorname{Part}(\mathrm{s})$ of body injured by accident or occupational disease: Neck and upper back
  14. Nature and extent of any permanent disability: N/A
  15. Compensation paid to-date for temporary disability: -0 -
  16. Value necessary medical aid paid to date by employer/insurer? -0 -

Employee: Bryan Portell Injury No.: 02-056663 17. Value necessary medical aid not furnished by employer/insurer? None 18. Employee's average weekly wages: $\ 1,000.00 19. Weekly compensation rate: $\$ 628.90 / \ 329.42 20. Method wages computation: By agreement

COMPENSATION PAYABLE

  1. Amount of compensation payable:

None 22. Second Injury Fund liability: No

  1. Future requirements awarded: None

Said payments to begin N/A and to be payable and be subject to modification and review as provided by law.

The compensation awarded to the claimant shall be subject to a lien in the amount of N/A of all payments hereunder in favor of the following attorney for necessary legal services rendered to the claimant:

$\mathrm{N} / \mathrm{A}$

FINDINGS OF FACT and RULINGS OF LAW:

Employee:Bryan PortellInjury No.: 02-056663
Dependents:N/ABefore the
Division of Workers'
Employer:Ford Motor CompanyCompensation
Department of Labor and Industrial
Additional Party:Second Injury Fund (Open)Relations of Missouri
Jefferson City, Missouri
Insurer:Self-InsuredChecked by: CTL:tr

PREFACE

A hearing in the above mentioned matter was held on June 8, 2006. The Claimant, Bryan Portell, was represented by Attorney Thomas O’Driscoll. The Employer/self-insurer, Ford Motor Company, was represented by Attorney Kenneth Alexander.

ISSUES

  1. Whether Claimant sustained an injury arising out of and in the course of his employment;
  2. Medical causation;
  3. Past medical bills and expenses; and
  4. Nature and extent of permanent partial disability.

EXHIBITS

Claimant offered the following exhibits:

Exhibit A.Ford Motor Company Medical Unit Records.
Exhibit B.Medical Records of Dr. Kevin Oliver.
Exhibit C.Medical Records of Dr. Mark Goodwin.
Exhibit D.Medical Records of Dr. John Hendricks.
Exhibit E.Medical Records of Injury Specialists.
Exhibit F.Medical Records of Health South.
Exhibit G.Deposition of Dr. Volarich.

Employer offered the following exhibit: Exhibit 1. Deposition of Dr. Russell Cantrell.

FINDINGS OF FACT

  1. Claimant, at the time of hearing, stated he was born on February 2, 1967, was 39 years of age, and had worked at the Employer’s assembly line since 1996 to the time of the hearing.
  2. Claimant testified at that the time of his alleged injury he was working on a frame deck job which required him to operate a hoist with push buttons that moved frames assembled onto vehicles with the weight of each frame being between 300 and 600 pounds.
  3. On May 29, 2002, at approximately 3:00 p.m., the Claimant was operating a hoist on the frame deck job and had positioned the frame while walking down an incline with both hands in an upright position and operating the hoist when he sneezed real hard three times and at the time third sneeze he felt severe pain between his shoulder blades and neck.
  4. Claimant worked the rest of the day after the sneezing incident and the following day he went to the plant’s medical facility and saw a plant nurse who told him she did not feel it was work related and he should go to his own personal doctor.
  5. Dr. Oliver, Claimant’s personal doctor, saw the Claimant and he referred him to a chiropractor, Dr. Hendricks. Claimant saw Dr. Hendricks a couple times and then came under the care of another chiropractor, Dr. Goodwin, who saw him from June 7, 2002, through September 13, 2002. Dr. Goodwin gave him electrical muscle stimulations and manipulations.
  6. Claimant also saw Dr. Feinberg who gave the Claimant injections for myofascial pain complaints and then referred the Claimant to Health South for therapy.
  7. Claimant testified that at the time of the hearing that he still has consistent pain in his upper back region and neck. Claimant returned to work on September 11, 2002.
  8. Claimant essentially was diagnosed by various doctors and chiropractors with cervical, thoracic and left shoulder strains with myofascial pain.
  9. At the time of the hearing Claimant stated that he was still having problems with pain in his back and neck.
  10. Dr. Russell Cantrell testified very credibly on behalf of the Employer that when he examined the Claimant that Claimant had myofascial pain that originated from muscles and connected tissues in the thoracic area of the back. Dr. Cantrell further testified that the Claimant’s myofascial complaints in the upper back, neck and trapezius area were not work related and that Claimant’s problems arose as a result of the fact that he had sneezed.

CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

Thus, I find that Claimant did not sustain an accident arising out of and in the course of his employment and therefore there is no award for nature and extent of permanent partial disability or past medical expenses.

A true copy: Attest:

Patricia "Pat" Secrest

Director

Division of Workers' Compensation

Employee: Bryan Portell

A true copy: Attest:

Patricia "Pat" Secrest

Director

Division of Workers' Compensation

Injury No.: 02-056663

Related Decisions

Thompson v. CSI Commercial Services, Inc.(2023)

February 14, 2023#10-087819

affirmed

The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirmed the Administrative Law Judge's award allowing workers' compensation benefits to Theresa Thompson for a low back injury sustained on July 20, 2010 while lifting and shelving copper coils. The claimant was entitled to temporary total disability benefits, permanent partial disability compensation, and medical aid totaling over $223,000, with additional underpayment and back pay amounts owed.

back12,259 words

Brown v. Noranda Aluminum, Inc.(2023)

February 3, 2023#16-027102

affirmed

The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirmed the administrative law judge's award granting permanent total disability compensation to Donald Brown for his work-related injuries to his back and left elbow. The Commission rejected the Second Injury Fund's argument that an anxiety disability should be considered in the PTD determination, finding that non-qualifying psychiatric disabilities need not be factored into the analysis.

back7,339 words

Battles v. Heptacore Inc./Bloomsdale Excavating(2023)

February 2, 2023#16-082564

modified

The Commission modified the ALJ's award to allow compensation for unpaid past medical expenses for employee Rodney Battles, who sustained a work-related back injury on October 5, 2016, requiring two back surgeries. The decision clarifies that an employer's duty to provide statutorily-required medical aid is absolute and unqualified under Missouri workers' compensation law.

back6,444 words

Gourley v. Cox Medical Center(2021)

December 15, 2021#07-031701

affirmed

The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirmed the administrative law judge's award allowing workers' compensation benefits for Carol Gourley's injury sustained on January 13, 2007 at Cox Medical Center. One commissioner dissented, arguing the ALJ erred in denying payment for unpaid medical bills ($173,896.25) and temporary total disability benefits ($109,574.64) related to the compensable 2007 injury.

back12,971 words

Comer v. Central Programs, Inc.(2021)

August 11, 2021#16-085212

affirmed

The Commission affirmed the Administrative Law Judge's award of permanent total disability compensation, finding the employee's November 1, 2016 back injury combined with qualifying preexisting disabilities met statutory requirements for Second Injury Fund liability. The employee's preexisting lower left extremity and thoracic disabilities, each exceeding fifty weeks of permanent partial disability, directly aggravated and accelerated the primary work-related back injury resulting in permanent total disability.

back14,532 words