Ms. Bartle, 22 years old as of the date of hearing in this matter, began her employment with Meramec Group in May of 2002. Ms. Bartle was employed as a "line operator/mold tech", and her duties included pulling shoe soles out of molds, and taking molds on and off the assembly line. Ms. Bartle acknowledged that the various metal molds used on her assembly line were approximately 12 inches long, and weighed as much as 70 to 150 pounds apiece.
At hearing Ms. Bartle testified that while between shelves of molds, and as she was picking up a mold off of the floor next to her cart, a mold fell off of a shelf and struck her in the back of the head. In an injury report dated 3/10/03 (See Claimant's Exhibit H) Ms. Bartle reported that she "noticed the mold fell off my cart and had hit me in the head". Dr. Peeples, in his report dated 12/2/03 (Claimant's Exhibit E) documents a history provided to him by Ms. Bartle as follows: "On 3/3/03, while putting molds into a rack, a mold fell off the top of the card (sp) which she was loading and hit her on the back and top of the head". On cross-examination, Ms. Bartle acknowledged that she could not recall whether the mold fell off of her cart or fell off of a storage shelf. Irrespective of the exact mechanism of injury, it is clear from the record that at approximately 1:30 p.m. on 3/6/03, and nearing the close of a work shift beginning at 7:00 a.m. and to end at 3:00 p.m., Ms. Bartle suffered an injury by accident arising out of and in the course of her employment when she was struck in the back of the head by a heavy metal mold.
Claimant relates that she "passed out" as a result of the trauma to her head, and recalls that when she regained consciousness her head was pounding, and she was suffering from swelling on her head. Claimant reported her injury to a supervisor, and though feeling dizzy and with a knot on her head, chose to refuse the immediate offer of medical attention. Claimant relates that she spent the balance of her work shift in the break room, and did not seek medical attention until later that night.
Medical records from Missouri Baptist Sullivan (Claimant's Exhibit A) reveal that on 3/6/03 Ms. Bartle presented with complaints of headache, nausea, and blurred vision following her head trauma. CT of the brain performed that evening was reported as negative. Medical records from BJC Union Clinic (Claimant's Exhibit C) indicate that on 3/10/03 the claimant presented with a history of concussion injury to her head, and with complaints of head and eye pain. On that same date, 3/10/03, Ms. Bartle met with Dr. Fitzgerald, the "company doctor", who diagnosed Ms. Bartle as suffering from closed head trauma and concussion. Dr. Fitzgerald prescribed Ibuprofen and instructed the claimant to return for follow up in one week. On 3/17/03 Ms. Bartle reported ongoing complaint of dizziness, occasional headache and blurred vision, and was to
return in one week (see Claimant's Exhibit D).
On 7/3/03 Ms. Bartle presented at Missouri Baptist Hospital-Sullivan with various complaints of nausea, body numbness, "passing out", and of problems with her vision. A non-contrast brain scan and an EKG were performed and were reported as negative.
On 7/07/03 Ms. Bartle presented at BJC Union Clinic with a history of seizure complaint. EEG and MRI were recommended in conjunction with a neurology referral.
On 7/14/03 the claimant met with Dr. David Peeples, a neurologist, by referral by Dr. Glen Calvin, the claimant's personal physician. In his written report dated 7/14/03 (See Claimant's Exhibit F), Dr. Peeples recites a history of claimant having suffered four generalized seizures over the past week or so. Dr. Peeples performed an examination, and concluded that the claimant required medication, Trileptal 300 mg twice a day, for "a new onset seizure disorder". Dr. Peeples was unable to state whether the head trauma suffered by the claimant was contributory to her seizure disorder.
On 7/16/03 Ms. Bartle met with Dr. Fitzgerald, who was provided with the history of head trauma on 3/6/03, followed by complaint of seizures on multiple occasions beginning on 7/3/03. Dr. Fitzgerald recommended a referral for neurological evaluation. On 8/15/03 Ms. Bartle met with Dr. Peeples for further evaluation as to her work injury of 3/6/03. The history provided to Dr. Peeples at that time included complaints of headache, nausea, and vomiting shortly after the head trauma at issue, followed in early July of 2003 with episodes of loss of consciousness, associated with urinary incontinence, convulsive movements, and post ictal confusion. Dr. Peeples completed a neurologic examination that revealed normal responses and negative findings. Dr. Peeples nonetheless concluded that Ms. Bartle suffered from a new onset seizure disorder; that she remained seizure free for the last six months while on the Trileptal; and further stated that "It is recognized that head trauma even without loss of consciousness or radiologic evidence of intraparenchymal damage can be a significant risk factor for subsequent development of seizures". Dr. Peeples went on to state that there was no specific test or definitive way to determine whether the seizure disorder at issue is idiopathic or post traumatic. Dr. Peeples went on to recommend an MRI to rule out any underlying structural lesion that would predispose or cause seizures.
Although it is not clear as to the exact date of the testing, Claimant's Exhibit H includes an outpatient admission record from Missouri Baptist Sullivan dated 8/14/03, and an EEG report from E.R. Schultz. M.D., prepared on or before 8/20/03, relating to an EEG performed on "Bartle, Virginia".
At the request of Dr. Peeples, an MRI of the brain with and without contrast was performed on 2/9/04. The MRI report indicates that the MRI was negative, with inflammatory changes of the paranasal sinuses seen (See Claimant's Exhibit E).